SF Planning Commission · Public Comment

400 PAUL AVENUE

58-6616 · 400 PAUL AVENUE

29comments
29in person
0emails
14hearings
20002001in person2000-07-27 — 4 comments, 25% in favour (click to read)2000-09-07 — 4 comments, 25% in favour (click to read)2000-09-14 — 6 comments, 67% in favour (click to read)2000-09-21 — 3 comments, 67% in favour (click to read)2000-10-19 — 1 comments, 100% in favour (click to read)2000-12-14 — 2 comments, 100% in favour (click to read)2001-04-19 — 5 comments, 40% in favour (click to read)2001-04-26 — 4 comments, 25% in favour (click to read)email
dashed lines mark hearings · supportopposenot recorded · dot size = comments that day · click a dot to jump to the comment

Hearings

13 Apr 2000 — continuanceApr 200011 May 2000 — continuance13 Jul 2000 — continuance27 Jul 2000 — continuance07 Sep 2000 — approve with conditions14 Sep 2000 — approve with conditions21 Sep 2000 — approve with conditions19 Oct 2000 — approve14 Dec 2000 — approve22 Feb 2001 — continuance05 Apr 2001 — continuance12 Apr 2001 — continuance19 Apr 2001 — continuance26 Apr 2001 — continuanceApr 2001
approved  continued  denied / withdrawn  · 14 hearings · hover a marker for the date and outcome

Comments by hearing (29)

expand all · collapse all · comments with recorded text are listed first

2000-07-27 · 4 comments · 1 / 3
Robert Crebs · spoken · 2000-07-27 · support
Project Sponsor representing Sprint PCS - The conditional use petition complies with the WTS Sighting Guidelines and the San Francisco Municipal Code. - This site is a preference 1. - Over 100 organizations and tenants were notified to attend a community hearing yet no one attended. - There was a second community hearing and only one person attended. - The proposed installation is necessary to provide cell commu… show more
Ralph House · spoken · 2000-07-27 · oppose
Bayview Hill Neighborhood Association - There is a lack of interest from the community because he believes the community doesn?t understand the technology of cell phone communications. - There are some health problems with using cell phones. Sprint PCS has assured that digital technology is less harmful. - There have been 5 installations approved in the area, some include antennas, switching stations/transition stations, etc.
Ina Glim · spoken · 2000-07-27 · oppose
- She came to speak on item 17 but this item involves the same problem. - She is from the Nob Hill neighborhood. - In the last week she has received 3 notices of installations in Nob Hill. - The building that she lives in is proposed for antenna installation. - Commercial buildings are not of concern, but when it comes to residential buildings, where there are children and people with health problems, it can be a… show more
Gary Briggs · spoken · 2000-07-27 · oppose
- His concern is that he made a special trip to talk about Item 17, yet it was canceled. - He lives in a building that he owns and he received a notice from the Planning Department because he lives within 300 feet of a proposed site for antenna installation. - There is a problem with the mailing of notices since it appears that notices are being sent to residents and not building/property owners. - Hearings are sc… show more
2000-09-07 · 4 comments · 1 / 3
Doug Thompson · spoken · 2000-09-07 · support
Project Architect
Christine Haupert-Wemmer · spoken · 2000-09-07 · oppose
- The language notification is an issue. - The meetings were held in the Mission District, yet Metricom stated they didn?t know most of the residents spoke other languages. Yet, the district is mostly Hispanic. - Most of the people who attended the meetings were English-speaking residents because they understood the notice. She believes that there would have been more residents who could have attended the meeting if the notices were bilingual.
Elizabeth Bell · spoken · 2000-09-07 · oppose
- She quoted a statement from the Planning Department Guidelines on antennas. - If this application is approved, there will be 22 antennas in one location, making the location an antenna farm. - She would like to request from the Board of Supervisors that they pass legislation that no more antennas would be installed at this location.
Pat Gerber · spoken · 2000-09-07 · oppose
- She would like to address the fact that the posters placed on the site of the building were incorrect since 1045 Capp Street is a Senior Citizen center for Latinos. - Although the site is a preference 1 location, it is only because there is a Pacific Bell building. - She would like to request a variance be sought for this building.
2000-09-14 · 6 comments · 4 / 2
Toby Levy · spoken · 2000-09-14 · support
Architect for Project - The project is for a 4 unit building. - This project would demolish a smaller building. - These units will be townhouse units. - They met with the neighbors and there was no opposition.
Andy Forrest · spoken · 2000-09-14 · support
- He inspected the building and concluded that the building was in bad shape. - Everything about the building is unserviceable.
Sue Hestor · spoken · 2000-09-14 · oppose
- When was the CU notice taken down? She referred several people in the Mission District and they couldn?t figure out where the site was. - CU signs are supposed to stay up until the hearing.
Jerry Amansa · spoken · 2000-09-14 · oppose
- She walked by the site and didn?t see the notice either. - The design of the house will be a townhouse style which makes it non-affordable. - Affordable housing is so important in the Mission District as well as throughout the City.
Joe O?Donoghue · spoken · 2000-09-14 · support
- People knew of the site of this construction. - Who took the notice down? That is the question. - A homeowner owned the current building. The new construction will make the site into 4 units.
David Prowler · spoken · 2000-09-14 · support
Staff did a great job with this project.
2000-09-21 · 3 comments · 2 / 1
Joe O?Donaghue · spoken · 2000-09-21 · support
- There was a letter which was sent to Ali Goss. - He has taken a stand on exactions. - He has never agreed with evictions, he didn?t know that one of the members of his organization had purchased the building. He finds it disturbing that the rent of the tenants had been increased.
Alice Barkley · spoken · 2000-09-21 · support
Representing Project Sponsor - Based on suggestions from staff, the project has been redesigned in regards to the exterior. - She had some letters of support (which she submitted to the Commission). - The current tenants, Real Estate Times, knew that they would like to be relocated. The other tenants of the building approve of the project. (+/-) Scott Yaffe - He is here to support this project. The problem he is… show more
Ali Goss · spoken · 2000-09-21 · oppose
- He is one of the tenants of the building. He was overlooked since his name is not on any of the reports. - He has never received anything in the mail. - The letter which was sent to the tenants, said that there were 5 spaces and 4 were vacant. That fact is inaccurate. The Planning Department was unaware that there were people being employed. There are 5 tenants which occupy this building. - His received a letter… show more
2000-10-19 · 1 comments · 1 / 0
Robert Crebs · spoken · 2000-10-19 · support
- Notices were provided in English, Spanish and Cantonese - A total of 7 people attended community meetings and their questions and issues were addressed. - Residents within 300 feet were notified.
2000-12-14 · 2 comments · 2 / 0
Jonathan Brink · spoken · 2000-12-14 · support
- They provide support and treatment who are mentally ill. - Their organization basically helps people who have been in hospitals and need a transitional place to get back into the real world. - A few years ago they developed the first detox program. There have never been any complaints to this organization being located in the avenues. - The CATS program (which is a shelter program) has 26 adults living there who… show more
Doug Shoemaker · spoken · 2000-12-14 · support
- He works with the organization and believes they are a very professional organization. - He Would like to have project approved.
2001-04-19 · 5 comments · 2 / 3
David Silverman · spoken · 2001-04-19 · support
Reuben and Alter - This application was filed over a year ago and has gone through many changes. - The project complies with all the IPZ resolutions, residential requirements, no variances are required, etc. - This will be a positive contribution to the neighborhood. - He, as well as the project architect, is available for any questions.
Bill Minky · spoken · 2001-04-19 · support
- He owns the warehouse at 1050 Mississippi. - This project will be an improvement all around.
Dick Millet · spoken · 2001-04-19 · oppose
Potrero Boosters - Are there any drawings of this building? - Was a 311 notice ever sent out? - The building is too large and the parking doesn't work since the entrance is too narrow. - He has a problem with the fact that the two lower floors are 100% lot coverage and the windows are set back for light and air. - The buildings next door are lower than this project. - The east side of Mississipp… show more
Elena Myers · spoken · 2001-04-19 · oppose
- She lives on Mississippi. - She is also concerned about the height of the building. They look like lofts. - She would like to have a restriction imposed so there is no overnight sleeping in the industrial units. This would protect them from the overuse of size in residential. - The street is very jammed during the day. This project should have its own loading dock.
Favian Lanoy · spoken · 2001-04-19 · oppose
- The 12-foot door is in compliance and is a requirement by the City. - There is no problem for cars to move in and out of the garage.
2001-04-26 · 4 comments · 1 / 3
Dick Millet · spoken · 2001-04-26 · oppose
Potrero Boosters Neighborhood Association - The attorney for the project sponsor sent him the revised parking information. At first he didn't have a problem but now he does. - Parking does not work. It will be difficult to get a car in and cars out. - He recommends taking a bathroom and moving it next to the men's bathroom and moving the wet bar into the office. This would give five more feet.
David Silverman · spoken · 2001-04-26 · support
Reuben and Alter – Representing Project Sponsor - He submitted revised parking information. - He is available for questions.
Max Schmeder · spoken · 2001-04-26 · oppose
- He has been living on this block since 1981. - The one-story project will create a lot of traffic problems. - The concerns they have are regarding expanding--adding spaces to the plan. He referenced a diagram of the parking issue. - The spaces are not big enough and there aren't enough of them. - Under regulations, businesses have overnight caretakers. If they moved into these units it would become… show more
Elena Myers · spoken · 2001-04-26 · oppose
- One of the very large businesses on the block has created a lot of problems because they have huge trucks coming and going. - They have acknowledged that this is a residential neighborhood. - The Commission needs to look at this as a residential project. - There are already lofts on the block. - This project needs to have four parking spaces. There aren't enough street spaces to accommodate all the … show more