SF Planning Commission · Public Comment

14 COSTA STREET

58-6613 · 14 COSTA STREET

34comments
34in person
0emails
9hearings
200020012002200320042005200620072008200920102011in person2000-07-06 — 3 comments, 67% in favour (click to read)2000-08-10 — 21 comments, 62% in favour (click to read)2000-09-07 — 1 comments, 100% in favour (click to read)2011-06-09 — 9 comments, 78% in favour (click to read)email
dashed lines mark hearings · supportopposenot recorded · dot size = comments that day · click a dot to jump to the comment

Hearings

06 Apr 2000 — no action recordedApr 200011 May 2000 — no action recorded22 Jun 2000 — continuance06 Jul 2000 — approve13 Jul 2000 — approve10 Aug 2000 — approve with conditions24 Aug 2000 — continuance07 Sep 2000 — continuance09 Jun 2011 — approveJun 2011
approved  continued  denied / withdrawn  · 9 hearings · hover a marker for the date and outcome

Comments by hearing (34)

expand all · collapse all · comments with recorded text are listed first

2000-07-06 · 3 comments · 2 / 1
Eugene Sakai · spoken · 2000-07-06 · support
Project Sponsor - Studio Esquire Architects In response to meeting with the various residents of the neighborhood, their goal has been to design a high quality project that would enhance the street scape and be a Agood neighbor.@ - He is trying to design a building that is both compatible and harmonious with the neighborhood.
Michael Edelstein · spoken · 2000-07-06 · oppose
- He read a letter on behalf of various residents of the neighborhood. - He opposes this project because a project like this one removes the character from the neighborhood.
Jim Harold · spoken · 2000-07-06 · support
Lives across the street from proposed construction - He is not overly happy about the loss of an older building. - The proposed design seems to fit well with the neighborhood. - There are certain items and issues which could be changed with regards to the design.
2000-08-10 · 21 comments · 13 / 8
Joe O · spoken · 2000-08-10 · support
' Donahue - Residential Builders - It makes sense for Beverages and More to be located there.
Steven McCleran · spoken · 2000-08-10 · support
one of the founders of Beverages and More - The company did an analysis and a comparison of the various Beverages and More. - The design of the store at this site will fit the circumstances of the area. - Since 1994, not one single independent liquor store has closed their doors because of Beverages and More, simply because BevMore are a different kind of store.
Jessica Hessman · spoken · 2000-08-10 · support
- She agrees with other speakers in support of BevMo. - She believes that the benefits outweigh the costs.
Matt Alexander · spoken · 2000-08-10 · support
- He and his family are customers of many of the retail stores on Geary Boulevard
Michelle Myers · spoken · 2000-08-10 · support
- She is here to support the Beverages and More project. - She drives to Blockbuster or to Mels Diner even though they are close to her house. - If she needs to get some ice cream or some beer, she would go to the corner store. She would go to Beverages and More to get the higher end specialty goods.
Randy Kaplan · spoken · 2000-08-10 · support
- He is a small business owner - This would help the neighbors.
Mark Wasack · spoken · 2000-08-10 · support
- 20 year resident of the area. - He is an attorney and his firm has done work for Beverages and More - He shops at Trader Joes, and he eats at the restaurants in the area along with his family. - The products that Beverages and More provide are good quality. - This would be a good addition to the neighborhood.
Wilfred Wong · spoken · 2000-08-10 · support
- He has been a resident of San Francisco for 49 years. - He has owned a store at Ashbury and Market for many years. - He has been watching this company for many years. - This company is a high quality retail store.
Sharon Mark · spoken · 2000-08-10 · support
- Owns one of the building in the area which has 33 units. - Please deny DR and approve store.
Ban Hudson · spoken · 2000-08-10 · support
President and CEO of Beverages and More - Why does Beverages and More want to open a store at this location? They don ' t believe that the majority of the people are against their store. - They are a neighborhood specialty store. They assist the neighborhoods. The neighborhood will appreciate the service they provide. - Traffic and Parking is an issue in Northern California. This area has been zoned for retai… show more
David Richards · spoken · 2000-08-10 · support
Officer of Beverages an More - There are 45,000 members just in San Francisco City and County. - There are 14,367 members of the Bev Club. - They have talked to their club members and they are asking for this store because it s convenient.
Andrew Junius · spoken · 2000-08-10 · support
Reuben & Alter - Representing Beverages and More - This project is a fully code-compliant use. - We talked about the Trader Joe issue in greater detail in our report. - Project designed so there will not be a traffic problem. - This store is located in an NC-3 district.
Tim Earny · spoken · 2000-08-10 · support
Wilbir, Smith Associates - They did count about 500 vehicles going to the Trader Joe store. - A parking study was done and parking conditions were looked at - The addition of about 20 -30 vehicles would not substantially worsen the actual traffic conditions. - Field counts were not conducted at other Beverages and More locations.
David Heller · spoken · 2000-08-10 · oppose
President of the Geary Boulevard Merchants Association - Their concerns are about safety and traffic. - Parking is a major problem in the Geary Street area. - He sees a potential disaster happening if this project is approved. - This will have a devastating affect on their neighborhood.
William Goodson · spoken · 2000-08-10 · oppose
- To get to the parking spaces that Beverages and More is providing, you have to drive down below street level through a passage way that is 14 feet wide. An SUV is about 6 1/2 feet wide which means that anyone who has a car larger than a Geo, Saturn, or Toyota would have to park on the street. - It is illogical for such a small space to be used for in/out cars.
Bob Lee · spoken · 2000-08-10 · oppose
President of the Francisco Heights Neighborhood Association - Supervisor Yaki mentioned that we need to look into the future. - UCFS is adding many residential units. - My son was injured at this intersection.
Ron Pierce · spoken · 2000-08-10 · oppose
President of the Jordan Park Neighborhood Association - He comes with no malice to Beverages and More - He opposes this case primarily because of the parking and traffic impact in the neighborhood. - Stanyan is one of many major corridors. - This is a very hazardous and dangerous location. - There is a loading dock which will cause traffic problems when delivery trucks are trying to back up into a small space. T… show more
Ron Miguel · spoken · 2000-08-10 · oppose
President of the Planning Association of the Richmond - This is a situation where a building was not designed to effectively handle the commercial activity it will generate, nor the resulting parking issues - Beverages is ill suited for this neighborhood. - He has been a customer of Beverages and More but this site is not good for the neighborhood.
Ron Konapouski · spoken · 2000-08-10 · oppose
- Has lived in the Richmond for about 30 years. - He echos everything that people have mentioned.
Ralf Sisfek · spoken · 2000-08-10 · oppose
- Lives on Anza Street - He shares the concerns which have been expressed. He knows the intersection very well. It already is a strange intersection. - The intersection is very narrow as well as subject to fast traffic. Tailor Nagle - 30 years resident of Jordan Park - His mother lives on Jordan Avenue. - His concerns are about traffic. - This project is not appropriate and/or compatible to the neighborhood. … show more
Michael Sullivan · spoken · 2000-08-10 · oppose
- Has lived on Stanyan street for about 40 years. - He works out of his home. - Every day of the week he hears screeching brakes. - He and his wife have a concern of the traffic safety at that intersection. - Difficult to find parking in this area. - This store will not be a store which would just attract people from the neighborhood. It will bring people from various parts of the City.
2000-09-07 · 1 comments · 1 / 0
Michael Cruz · spoken · 2000-09-07 · support
- Resident of Cole Valley. - He reviewed 3 potential solutions and offered them to his neighbors. - The responses to the solutions were either that it was too expensive, not feasible, not interested. - He understands the desire to build a 3rd story and would like to collaborate and find a solution to the proposed design. - Although his solutions were dismissed, they are not the only solutions and he is willing to cooperate.
2011-06-09 · 9 comments · 7 / 2
Sandra Manny · spoken · 2011-06-09 · oppose
no text recorded
Herman LaZadia · spoken · 2011-06-09 · support
no text recorded
Terry Milne · spoken · 2011-06-09 · support
no text recorded
Carolina Moratillo · spoken · 2011-06-09 · support
no text recorded
Gloria Salazar · spoken · 2011-06-09 · support
no text recorded
Evangeline Bagare · spoken · 2011-06-09 · support
no text recorded
Floramay Ptalinhug Nella Manuel · spoken · 2011-06-09 · support
no text recorded
Lorenzo Listana · spoken · 2011-06-09 · support
no text recorded
Steve Fox · spoken · 2011-06-09 · oppose
no text recorded