SF Planning Commission · Public Comment

1338 FILBERT STREET

58-6321 · 1338 FILBERT STREET

40comments
40in person
0emails
10hearings
20002001in person2000-06-15 — 22 comments, 14% in favour (click to read)2000-07-06 — 5 comments, 40% in favour (click to read)2000-09-21 — 1 comments, 100% in favour (click to read)2000-12-14 — 5 comments, 0% in favour (click to read)2001-02-22 — 7 comments, 43% in favour (click to read)email
dashed lines mark hearings · supportopposenot recorded · dot size = comments that day · click a dot to jump to the comment

Hearings

15 Jun 2000 — continuanceJun 200022 Jun 2000 — continuance06 Jul 2000 — approve14 Sep 2000 — continuance21 Sep 2000 — approve with conditions26 Oct 2000 — continuance09 Nov 2000 — continuance14 Dec 2000 — approve22 Feb 2001 — approve with conditions14 Jun 2001 — continuanceJun 2001
approved  continued  denied / withdrawn  · 10 hearings · hover a marker for the date and outcome

Comments by hearing (40)

expand all · collapse all · comments with recorded text are listed first

2000-06-15 · 22 comments · 3 / 19
Alan Kronsky · spoken · 2000-06-15 · oppose
1st DR Requestor - lives at 553 29th Street - He would like modification of the design of the proposed project. - He stood in front of the Commission a few years ago when he wanted to add rooms to his home. His case was approved because he took into consideration the opinion of his neighbors and the look of other homes in the neighborhood. - The developers will come and do their construction and then leave. - Sun… show more
James Ninemacker · spoken · 2000-06-15 · support
one of the Project Sponsors There are other buildings that are larger with penthouses and lesser setbacks, only at certain angles can you see the penthouse.
Shawn Gorman · spoken · 2000-06-15 · support
Project Architect - Gary Gee Architects - There were many schemes to try to meet the issues the neighbors brought up.
Rick Berman · spoken · 2000-06-15 · oppose
Lives at 511 29th Street The name of his wife was listed as supporters of the project. The behavior of the developer in compiling a list of neighbors in support is deceptive. - Adding buildings that tower over 29th Street is a disservice to them. - Their experience with this developer is unwillingness to consider the intent of the Residential Design Guidelines.
Connie Fangled · spoken · 2000-06-15 · oppose
Lives at 540 29th Street - She has leukemia and stays at home a lot. The thought of going thorough the construction is overwhelming. - Her tenant has threatened to move out because of the hardship the construction will cause.
Paul Curtis · spoken · 2000-06-15 · oppose
- He came to the hearing to oppose 129 Randall Street. The proposed construction is a few blocks away from his home so it is still his neighborhood. - The proposed home will make the neighborhood be out of character.
Marilyn Heiss · spoken · 2000-06-15 · oppose
Lives at 650 29th Street - She and her family have lived there for 8 years. - The housing market at the time they bought their home, wasn?t as it is now and they had a choice of where to live. - They are not against the development but developers should not be able to overwhelm everything around them.
Celeste West · spoken · 2000-06-15 · oppose
- She recommends that plans be reworked to be compatible with neighborhood buildings. - Please consider the earth and all the creatures. Do not allow for land to be exploited by massive floor plans. - Please support humanity?s deep need for buildings designed with love, imagination, playfulness and humor.
Vicky Rosen · spoken · 2000-06-15 · oppose
President of Upper Noe Valley Neighbors - This is about respect for people and where they live. It?s about preserving the environmental quality of where people live. - She feels that it?s really disrespectful for developers to not try and honestly work with people because the people are who will remain long after the developers have gone. - It is very important to keep with Proposition M.
Mary Arguelles · spoken · 2000-06-15 · oppose
Lives at Noe and Day Street - This is a group of people that want to work together and prove that they can do that. Most people have either planned a project, been through a project and added on to their homes and it works and now they are all raising their families there.
Mark Tully · spoken · 2000-06-15 · oppose
Lives at 610 29th Street - He was shocked and aghast to see the demolition notice at the proposed site. - All the neighbors have joined to demand a downsizing of this project.
John Sanger · spoken · 2000-06-15 · support
Sanger & Olson - Representing Project Sponsor - There aren?t any insertions in the communications to the Commissions with neighborhood support for this project. What was presented to the Commission was a survey of the neighborhood opinions. - They took very seriously the staff comments and changes. Just yesterday they were able to provide a response to all the neighbor?s comments and staff recommendations. He r… show more
Robert Thomas · spoken · 2000-06-15 · oppose
Lives at 546 29th Street - There were other people who wanted to come to the hearing but weren?t able to come. - Would like for project to be reconsidered by the Planning Department.
Connie George · spoken · 2000-06-15 · oppose
Lives 531 29th Street - Her concerns are that the house is out of scale to the neighborhood. - There will be loss of light to their neighborhood. - There will be a loss to the green belt in the neighborhood.
Peg O?Malley · spoken · 2000-06-15 · oppose
Lives at 567 29th Street - She and her family have added to their home like many of the neighbors yet they have been respectful to the neighbors and the neighborhood. - The proposed houses will bring incredible income to the developer when sold.
Anastasia Yopinopolus · spoken · 2000-06-15 · oppose
Noe Tenants Association and Friends of Noe Valley - Where are the fire exits? - There are fire hazards to the proposed homes. - Developers should size their projects down. - This project needs a second look.
Howard Levit · spoken · 2000-06-15 · oppose
Lives at 450 Day Street - Have lived at this house for 23 years. - During these years, he has witnessed many additions to homes that meet with the character of the neighborhood. - The two houses proposed meet all the characteristics of a monster house.
Rob Rufner · spoken · 2000-06-15 · oppose
lives at 436 Day Street - Their situation is different because they live in the back of the house. Their kitchen window will look at the back of the proposed house. Instead of a blue sky and pitched roof skyline, they will now be looking at a gigantic edifice.
Amy Gordon · spoken · 2000-06-15 · oppose
- The developers didn?t start negotiations until November and they broke off negotiations the second week of January. - Their requirements have been the same since July and they have been very honest and very positive about these requirements. - There have been many changes to the plans, even last minute changes, yet there is still no agreement.
Jim Gordon · spoken · 2000-06-15 · oppose
- Lives next door of the property - He approves of an RH-2 development that is in scale with the neighborhood. - Many people in the neighborhood have built additions to their homes but nothing like the proposed project. - The project is not in scale with the neighborhood. - The guidelines state that if nothing helps then reduce the size of the building. - The construction will block light, air, and views to the adjacent neighbors.
David Zovikian · spoken · 2000-06-15 · oppose
2nd DR Requestor - lives at 538 29th Street - The design of this construction is completely out of character to the neighborhood. He doesn?t oppose the construction or development of the neighborhood. - He would like developer to eliminate the 5th floor penthouse and 12 foot setback into the rear. - The developer has no interest in the neighborhood. As soon as this home is built, the developer will move on to the … show more
Dave Munks · spoken · 2000-06-15 · oppose
President of the Noe Valley Democratic Club - He is concerned with the issues of community. - There is incredible anxiety going on in the neighborhood if this project is approved, more people will want to build without consulting the neighbors.
2000-07-06 · 5 comments · 2 / 3
Paul Candis · spoken · 2000-07-06 · oppose
President of the Castro East and West Improvement Club. - This club has been in existence since 1904. They have always worked for the quality of the neighborhood. They are concerned that the area is zoned for residential only above the street floor. Although this project is not taking away residential space, maybe some type of a condition could be place on the property--if Zephyr ever sold the space, this would come … show more
Cliff Lundberg · spoken · 2000-07-06 · oppose
Lives at 4028 24th Street - He lives in the flat on the second floor right next door. - The policy against second story commercial use has been a very successful one. This would be a violation of this policy. This project will also impact parking. - The light well in his home will be impacted by the proposed construction. - The back yard use, is a bit bothersome to him because it would be a place for people to ` h… show more
Anastasia Yovanopoulos · spoken · 2000-07-06 · oppose
Member of Noe Valley Tenants - The proposed project will take away houses and parking, which will cause traffic congestion. - She believes that it would be a waste of good space to put commercial use here. It should be residential.
Jonathan Pearlman · spoken · 2000-07-06 · support
Architectural Design Studio - Project Sponsor - The existing building was built in the >70s and it was actually a two story building that did come out to the street facade. It has been extensively remodeled to the condition it is now. - The old bank safe is a major concrete structure. - The entire building has different construction from different years. - The facade cannot be designed as an older building like… show more
Bill Riffle · spoken · 2000-07-06 · support
- The actual floor area is set back 5 feet from the property line. - The building was built as Gibraltar Savings and Loan, purchased by Security Pacific Bank. When Bank of America merged with Security Pacific Bank it was sold as excess property. - He purchased the property and converted it. Although he is a small business owner, he feels that he can compete offering the same services as the Abig guys.@
2000-09-21 · 1 comments · 1 / 0
Molly Keils · spoken · 2000-09-21 · support
This site was requested because of poor customer service and dropped calls and inability to make and receive calls. This site is a preference 5 site. They looked at other sites but none were appropriate enough.
2000-12-14 · 5 comments · 0 / 5
Cecile Lozano · spoken · 2000-12-14 · oppose
- Project should not be approved. -These lots are not the same size as they used to be, before BART bought the property. - There is a lots of noise, can?t even open windows
Angela Olson · spoken · 2000-12-14 · oppose
- She lives in the neighborhood. - The lots are on a lope and are very small. - She will be impacted with this development. - She agrees with homes being built there but not 9.
David Hooper · spoken · 2000-12-14 · oppose
Mission Terrace Neighborhood Association - There has been no effort to work with the context of the neighborhood. - There will be no back yards on these houses. - The lots are extremely narrow. - Nine buildings on narrow, short blocks should be analyzed.
Gene Bernardo · spoken · 2000-12-14 · oppose
- She and her husband live on Arco Way. - She realizes that there is a housing shortage but these many houses are too much. - A smaller number of houses would be more appropriate.
Jose Hernandez · spoken · 2000-12-14 · oppose
- The point of the video is to show that the site is not appropriate for housing. - This project should be denied. - Housing is needed but not these type of housing. - The lots have been on the market for a long time but no one has come forward to purchase the lots and construct anything -- until now.
2001-02-22 · 7 comments · 3 / 4
Ann Berry · spoken · 2001-02-22 · support
Neighbor - She loves all her neighbors. She is very honored to have the project sponsor's family as neighbors for 10 years. They always keep the home clean. Their family is large but they are very united. - She doesn't mind the construction to be vertical. - Families are very important.
Carol Ann Sanders · spoken · 2001-02-22 · oppose
DR Requestor - She is concerned about her view and the neighborhood. - There aren't any houses in the neighborhood this tall. - She is concerned about the impact there will be on parking. - The proposed construction will have eight rooms, which is just too much. - She submitted a letter from a neighbor who has her same concerns.
Antoinette Bolonokoft · spoken · 2001-02-22 · oppose
2 nd DR Requestor She lives across the street from the proposed project. - Her concern in the impact the project will have on the neighborhood since this building is just too large for the area. - She doesn't have any problems with the addition but she is not in agreement with the design. - This project will not fit in, even with the three-foot setback. - She agrees with the… show more
Ray O'Leary · spoken · 2001-02-22 · oppose
- He lives across the street from the proposed project. - He has been a resident of this block for 46 years. - He just surveyed 300 houses and there are no vertical additions. There have been horizontal ones but not vertical. - The neighborhood is so uniform that this structure will change the image. A box-like structure just does not fit into the neighborhood. - If it co… show more
Raul Artiga · spoken · 2001-02-22 · oppose
- He agrees with the comments the previous neighbors have stated. - He would also like to have the 3 rd floor addition removed. - The addition can be done horizontal with no problem. - He provided some plans for the Commissioners with the design he recommends.
Annie Chung · spoken · 2001-02-22 · support
Project Sponsor - She and her sister are proposing this project. - The proposed project will be a single-family home. - They will be removing one of the bedrooms on the second floor to make a bigger living room. - It is her culture to have all her family together. Right now there are seven family members living there. They don't have any intention to have more people … show more
Ana Chong · spoken · 2001-02-22 · support
Co-Sponsor - She is married and has a son. Since he was born, the three of them were sharing a room. - She would like to have more room so that their son can have his own room. - She would like the Commission to approve the project.