SF Planning Commission · Public Comment

22.0331

22.0331

38comments
38in person
0emails
2hearings
20232024in person2023-02-09 — 5 comments, 20% in favour (click to read)2023-03-09 — 33 comments, 30% in favour (click to read)email
dashed lines mark hearings · supportopposenot recorded · dot size = comments that day · click a dot to jump to the comment

Hearings

09 Feb 2023 — continuance09 Mar 2023 — approve with conditions
approved  continued  denied / withdrawn  · 2 hearings · hover a marker for the date and outcome

Comments by hearing (38)

expand all · collapse all · comments with recorded text are listed first

2023-02-09 · 5 comments · 1 / 4
Lawrence Michaelson · spoken · 2023-02-09 · oppose
No to continuance, allow the project to move forward
Jeremy Bladis · spoken · 2023-02-09 · oppose
No reason to continue
Cindy Kim · spoken · 2023-02-09 · oppose
Reconsider the continuance
Aleck Bash · spoken · 2023-02-09 · oppose
Why is it being continued
Jimmy Gubeladze · spoken · 2023-02-09 · support
For the continuance
2023-03-09 · 33 comments · 10 / 23
Mi Hung Li · spoken · 2023-03-09 · oppose
Will cause harm to the community
Ju Ju Li · spoken · 2023-03-09 · oppose
Oppose to opening of the dispensary
Li Hing Quan · spoken · 2023-03-09 · oppose
For the safety and health of the community
Madeline Trembly · spoken · 2023-03-09 · support
Seniors looking forward to lounge for medicinal purpose
Li Quan Ying · spoken · 2023-03-09 · oppose
Will harm our next generations
Alec Bash · spoken · 2023-03-09 · support
Many will benefit the dispensary, bring foot traffic to area
Liana Liu · spoken · 2023-03-09 · oppose
Why do we need another one
Winnie Fong · spoken · 2023-03-09 · oppose
Near school with lots of children and youth
Yu Yu Wu · spoken · 2023-03-09 · oppose
For the good of the community and children
Yang Kim Kim · spoken · 2023-03-09 · oppose
Area has too many students
Chun Yun Li · spoken · 2023-03-09 · oppose
Language support not provided
Carol Lundy · spoken · 2023-03-09 · oppose
Should include pre-schools in the regulations
Yesina Perry · spoken · 2023-03-09 · support
Supports the opening of the cannabis store
Selina Chu · spoken · 2023-03-09 · oppose
What's right for the community, too close to school
Wong Po Kho · spoken · 2023-03-09 · oppose
Impact the neighbors and the next generation
Eileen Chen · spoken · 2023-03-09 · oppose
Oppose to opening of the dispensary
Ho Ming Tan · spoken · 2023-03-09 · oppose
Going to harm our kids, it's not right
Andy Chu · spoken · 2023-03-09 · oppose
DR #2 presentation
Susana Lam · spoken · 2023-03-09 · oppose
DR #2 presentation
XiaoChuan Sun Peng · spoken · 2023-03-09 · oppose
DR #1 presentation
Lawrence Michaelson · spoken · 2023-03-09 · support
Project sponsor presentation
Jeremy Vladis · spoken · 2023-03-09 · support
Project sponsors are good people
David Goldman · spoken · 2023-03-09 · support
No evidence that employees or customers have caused any problems for the neighborhood
Ni Hao Lu · spoken · 2023-03-09 · oppose
Oppose to opening of the dispensary
Josephine Chan · spoken · 2023-03-09 · oppose
Where is the equity
Tam Min Ying · spoken · 2023-03-09 · oppose
Oppose to opening of the dispensary
Hazel Lee · spoken · 2023-03-09 · oppose
Must be a balance, 200+ cannabis stores, west side
Marlene Tran · spoken · 2023-03-09 · oppose
Near childcare and school, care about children and youth
Michael Cohen · spoken · 2023-03-09 · support
Improve - neighborhood, retail, pedestrian, seniors
Mushin Lin · spoken · 2023-03-09 · oppose
Oppose to opening of the dispensary
Austin Stewart · spoken · 2023-03-09 · support
Project sponsor is a community leader
Keith Arnold · spoken · 2023-03-09 · support
Need consumption lounges where patients can consume
Elizabeth Hansen · spoken · 2023-03-09 · support
Will bring diversity