2020-02-20 · 27 comments · 11 / 14
Shamann Walton · spoken · 2020-02-20 · support
Proposed legislation
Redman Lyons · spoken · 2020-02-20 · oppose
Street level PDR
Steve Vettel · spoken · 2020-02-20 · oppose
SB 330
Todd Mavis · spoken · 2020-02-20 · oppose
Housing
Michael Janis · spoken · 2020-02-20 · support
Vibrancy
Mark Clayman · spoken · 2020-02-20 · support
Existing business investments
Tom Radulovich · spoken · 2020-02-20 · neutral
Proposed modifications
Shane O'Conner · spoken · 2020-02-20 · oppose
More density
Joe Garvey · spoken · 2020-02-20 · oppose
Vehicle ownership, break-ins, Bayview CAC endorsement
Laura Foote · spoken · 2020-02-20 · oppose
Missed opportunity
Vincent Wu · spoken · 2020-02-20 · oppose
Short sided
Ryan Patterson · spoken · 2020-02-20 · oppose
Project description, SB 330
Robert Fallon · spoken · 2020-02-20 · oppose
Opposition, flexible zoning
Chris Harvey · spoken · 2020-02-20 · oppose
Opposition, flexible zoning
Corey Smith · spoken · 2020-02-20 · neutral
Money, process, zoning
Andrew Caltunia · spoken · 2020-02-20 · oppose
Opposition
Francisco Da Costa · spoken · 2020-02-20 · support
Contaminated hot spots
John Tague · spoken · 2020-02-20 · oppose
PDR
Dr. Carolyn Scott · spoken · 2020-02-20 · support
Rise Preparatory
Jayla Jordan · spoken · 2020-02-20 · support
Cannabis restriction zone
Julia Chen · spoken · 2020-02-20 · support
Rise Preparatory, plus amendment
Jeff Boyd · spoken · 2020-02-20 · support
Support
Manaj Daniels · spoken · 2020-02-20 · support
Support
John Moffly · spoken · 2020-02-20 · oppose
Opposition
Katherine Zhang · spoken · 2020-02-20 · support
Support
Lily Wu · spoken · 2020-02-20 · oppose
Opposition
Item 10a - Bayview Industrial Triangle Zoning UpdateDear Commissioners, I am the Planning representative for the 32 stakeholders (owners, merchants, and tenants) of the Bayview Industrial Triangle (BIT) that signed the letter dated January 14th requesting that the Department consider mixed-use zoning for the area. The letter includes an analysis of the area drawing from assessor, DPW, and Planning Department data and provides community-driven goals namely: density t… Dear Commissioners, I am the Planning representative for the 32 stakeholders (owners, merchants, and tenants) of the Bayview Industrial Triangle (BIT) that signed the letter dated January 14th requesting that the Department consider mixed-use zoning for the area. The letter includes an analysis of the area drawing from assessor, DPW, and Planning Department data and provides community-driven goals namely: density to activate the commercial uses along Third and to create a safer neighborhood for residents; flexibility to allow for commercial, R&D, and housing uses; and streetscape improvements such as a green corridor along Jerrold Avenue from the T-line to the produce market. The letter is in your packet and includes as an exhibit letters of concern that were addressed to Supervisor Walton in the fall. On January 22, I submitted comments to Planning in response to the Notification of Project Receiving Environmental Review (the last 6 pages in your case packet). The last page identifies a potential loss of 1,233 housing units from ever being built because the proposed PDR-1-G zoning prohibits housing (at 2.4 people per unit, that's almost 3,000 people not being housed). At a 20% affordable housing rate, that's roughly 600 people that would have qualified for affordable housing that won't be housed. This number does not include any of the State or Local density bonus programs that will also no longer be applicable, so in reality, there is even more affordable housing potential here that won't be realized. One parcel is approximately 34' from a transit stop. In addition, stakeholders agree to no net loss of PDR. The request by the community is to consider flexible zoning given the context of the BIT (such as UMU or something similar) for the parcels currently proposed for PDR-1-G zoning (the parcels not fronting Third Street). Please feel free to call or email me with any questions you may have regarding this item. Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. Sincerely, -Kate. Kate McGee KM Planning Strategy [phone removed] http://www.kmplanningstrategy.comshow more