2019-06-13 · 25 comments · 7 / 15
Leigh Lutenski · spoken · 2019-06-13 · neutral
Project presentation
Kate Caretti · spoken · 2019-06-13 · neutral
Seamless – Gateway to amenities
Madeline Mueller · spoken · 2019-06-13 · oppose
Not the place for a massive housing project
Item 8 on the 6-13-19 Agenda : 017-016313CWP PUBLIC LAND FOR HOUSING AND BALBOARESERVOIR To the Planning Commission: The proposed housing project is inappropriate for this site for many reasons: The density of the proposed project is somewhere around 10 times the density of the surrounding neighborhoods. People attending the CAC meetings have never been shown a three dimensional model of the proposed project! SF Muni<U+2019>s single track in each direction Muni Me… RESERVOIR To the Planning Commission: The proposed housing project is inappropriate for this site for many reasons: The density of the proposed project is somewhere around 10 times the density of the surrounding neighborhoods. People attending the CAC meetings have never been shown a three dimensional model of the proposed project! SF Muni<U+2019>s single track in each direction Muni Metro System cannot absorb the additional passenger load from 1100 additional units and from students who no longer have access to parking. Commute times to the College from Castro and Market on the K Line are often double what they were 1 year ago due to system delays. The 43 from Forrest Hill to the CCSF is so full at commute hours that passengers frequently are forced to stand in the door areas. Surrounding roads cannot absorb more ride share vehicles. Education and Housing should not be pitted against each other. Removing the majority of the College<U+2019>s parking and not replacing it, will take away educational from students, faculty and staff whose only option is drive to the school. It will decrease enrollment. Public Lands should stay in Public Hands. If the end decision is to build housing on this site, it should be 100% affordable with much of it being low income. I urge you to reject the housing proposal as currently constituted and to support turning over the lower reservoir (17 acres currently used for City College student parking) to City College of San Francisco. Fred Muhlheim, Lifelong Learner at CCSF and San Francisco Tax Payer [email removed] [phone removed], [phone removed]Cshow more Paul Leoni · spoken · 2019-06-13 · support
Mission Housing
Fred Malheim · spoken · 2019-06-13 · oppose
Density
Michael Adams · spoken · 2019-06-13 · oppose
Public land should be used for CCSF
Christine Lybel · spoken · 2019-06-13 · support
Public process
Christopher Peterson · spoken · 2019-06-13 · support
Maximize housing, no public parking
Michael Aarons · spoken · 2019-06-13 · oppose
Transfer to CCSF
Laura Fry · spoken · 2019-06-13 · oppose
Public land should stay public
John Winston · spoken · 2019-06-13 · neutral
Building a neighborhood
Anita Theoharis · spoken · 2019-06-13 · oppose
Affordable housing, CCSF
Lynn Kaufman · spoken · 2019-06-13 · oppose
Public land for the public good
Mark Tang · spoken · 2019-06-13 · support
Community expectations
Peter Waller · spoken · 2019-06-13 · support
Projection presentation
Steve Zelser · spoken · 2019-06-13 · oppose
Opposition for: George Wooding – Transfer to CCSF
Harry Bernstein · spoken · 2019-06-13 · oppose
Rejection of transfer by mayor
Christine Hanson · spoken · 2019-06-13 · oppose
Previous alternatives affordability
Balboa Reservoir Housing projectTo the Planning Commission, I urge you to reject the housing proposal as currently constituted and to support turning over the lower reservoir (17 acres currently used for City College student parking) to City College of San Francisco. Many CCSF students are unable to use public transportation, bicycle, or walk to school for various reasons. Removing this parking area would constitute an unacceptable burden on thes… To the Planning Commission, I urge you to reject the housing proposal as currently constituted and to support turning over the lower reservoir (17 acres currently used for City College student parking) to City College of San Francisco. Many CCSF students are unable to use public transportation, bicycle, or walk to school for various reasons. Removing this parking area would constitute an unacceptable burden on these students and contribute to the downsizing of a college that is truly a treasure for the people of San Francisco. Studies have shown that too much market rate housing construction has contributed to the gentrification process that cities across the nation have experienced. This project as currently proposed would likely create 67% market rate housing with only 1/3 "affordable" housing (if we can trust the proposed agreement). As people with higher salaries move into the neighborhood, the cost of living is likely to rise. We do urgently need housing affordable to low and middle income families and individuals, but this project will not help. There are many other locations throughout the city that would be much more suitable for affordable housing construction. Sincerely, Allan Fisher -- Allan Fisher [email removed] [phone removed]show more Steve Martin Pinto · spoken · 2019-06-13 · oppose
Density, transportation
Jennifer Heggy · spoken · 2019-06-13 · oppose
Affordable housing with transit improvements
Dunn Fowler · spoken · 2019-06-13 · support
Missing middle, support
Ellen Lee Zhou · spoken · 2019-06-13 · oppose
Affordable housing, for the people
Amy O'Hare · spoken · 2019-06-13 · support
Reservations
2020-05-28 · 17 comments · 13 / 4
John Winston · spoken · 2020-05-28 · support
Support
Sara Ogilvie · spoken · 2020-05-28 · support
Support
Theodore Randolph · spoken · 2020-05-28 · support
Approve
Jean Barish · spoken · 2020-05-28 · oppose
Do not approve
Jennifer Hege · spoken · 2020-05-28 · oppose
Unacceptable risk
Michael Pico · spoken · 2020-05-28 · support
Support
Laura Foote · spoken · 2020-05-28 · support
Support
Mark Tang · spoken · 2020-05-28 · support
Support, will provide much needed housing
Theo Gordon · spoken · 2020-05-28 · support
Support
Michael Ahrens · spoken · 2020-05-28 · oppose
Extreme danger and threats
George Wooding · spoken · 2020-05-28 · oppose
Public land should remain public
Steve Marzo · spoken · 2020-05-28 · support
We need this project
Christopher Peterson · spoken · 2020-05-28 · support
Support, ideal location
Peter Waller · spoken · 2020-05-28 · support
Design presentation
Leigh Lutenski · spoken · 2020-05-28 · support
Project presentation
Corey Smith · spoken · 2020-05-28 · support
Support
Yonathan Randolph · spoken · 2020-05-28 · support
Ideal place for housing