1600 Jackson Street (365 by Whole Foods Market)

2017-09-07 · 1 comments · 0 / 1

Adam Mayer · email · 2017-09-07 · oppose · source packet

Housing not Whole Foods 365 at 1600 Jackson - MPNA Letter
Dear Commissioners, Please see attached a letter of opposition from the Middle Polk Neighborhood Association (MPNA) for the Conditional Use Authorization of the Whole Foods 365 project at 1600 Jackson Street. Regards, Adam Mayer MPNA Director of Planning & Design -- Adam N. Mayer AIA, LEED AP BD+C [email removed]

2017-11-30 · 1 comments · 1 / 0

Adam Mayer · email · 2017-11-30 · support · source packet

1600 Jackson St - Coalition for San Francisco Neighborhoods (CSFN) resolution
Dear Planning Commissioners, Please see attached a resolution from the Coalition for San Francisco Neighborhoods (CSFN) in support of the Middle Polk Neighborhood Association's position on the 1600 Jackson Street project. Regards, Adam Mayer MPNA Director of Planning & Design -- Adam N. Mayer AIA, LEED AP BD+C [email removed]

2017-12-14 · 6 comments · 6 / 0

Shari Malone · email · 2017-12-14 · support · source packet

PLEASE support Whole Foods 365 desire to locate at 1600 Jackson!
I<U+2019>ve lived in San Francisco since 1985. Despite the various delivery systems, access to grocery stores is paramount to the enjoyment of our neighborhoods. 365 is an excellent grocery and my husband and I, and our neighbors are overjoyed with the prospect of having them locate at Lombardi<U+2019>s old location. PLEASE SUPPORT OUR NEIGHBORHOOD AND APPROVE OF 365 AT 1600 JACKSON. OUR enjoyment of… show more

James E Hirsch · email · 2017-12-14 · support · source packet

SUPPORT WHOLE FOODS 365 PROJECT @ 1600 JACKSON ST., San Francisco
Dear Honorable Members of the S.F. Planning Commission: I urge YOUR IMMEDIATE APPROVAL of the proposal for a Whole Foods 365 Market at 1600 Jackson St., San Francisco. I am one of the owners of the 1825-1845 Polk St. building directly across the street from the proposed project, and the residential tenants in our building would benefit greatly by a new Whole Foods 365 Market directly across the street. There a… show more

James Warshell · email · 2017-12-14 · support · source packet

Re: CUA for 1600 Jackson Street, 365 by Whole Foods
As CoChair of VNCNC, I completely support Ms Morgan<U+2019>s position. I am even more impassioned by the issue she also makes if the critical nature of higher and better use of a critical soft site with great potential for 1600 Jackson. The earlier proposal for retail with four floors of housing makes perfect sense for this site. We are in a housing crisis, this site is in a major transit area, the current b… show more

Anastasia M. Ashman · email · 2017-12-14 · support · source packet

IN SUPPORT ; whole foods, 1600 Jackson
Hi. We need a Whole Foods for the Polk Street neighborhood. Real Foods is on life support, at our expense. You know this. Thanks, Anastasia Ashman

Lynn Jacobs · email · 2017-12-14 · support · source packet

Support for Whole Foods 365 Market 1600 Jackson
To Whom It May Concern: I am writing to express my support for the proposed Whole Foods 365 Market at 1600 Jackson Street. I<U+2019>m a Russian Hill resident, and believe that quality grocery options on Polk St. are currently insufficient. I also believe that rehabilitating an existing building that fits in with the character of the neighborhood is preferable to tearing it down and replacing it with something n… show more

Townsend Walker · email · 2017-12-14 · support · source packet

Whole Foods 365 proposal for 1600 Jackson Street
Dear Commission Secretary, I support a Whole Foods 365 Market at 1600 Jackson. I live on Larkin at Greenwich. It<U+2019>s a grocery desert out here. There is no full service grocery store in the neighborhood that people can walk to, or park near. At one time Real Foods was a very good store. It has not been good for five years and shows no signs of returning to its former self. Bring food to the desert. T… show more

2017-12-21 · 1 comments · 1 / 0

Casie Zayouna · email · 2017-12-21 · support · source packet

1600 Jackson Street, Whole Foods 365 CU Application
From: Casie McCarthy 960 Pine St, Apt. 2 San Francisco, CA 94108 To: San Francisco Planning Department 1650 Mission Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94103 [email removed] With regards to: 1600 Jackson Street, Whole Foods 365 CU Application It has already been too long to have a major site like this remain vacant. I support the Whole Foods 365 proposal. Polk St is a mix of used space but is also lacking con… show more

2018-01-11 · 4 comments · 3 / 1

Dick Wayman · email · 2018-01-11 · support · source packet

1600 Jackson Street
I strongly support Whole Foods<U+2019> application for a conditional use permit that would allow the conversion of the vacant building at 1600 Jackson Street to a grocery store. Based on what I<U+2019>ve heard at several community meetings, the great majority of residents in the neighborhood concur in this support. I live next door to the building and am aware of how the conversion might affect local tra… show more

Mitchell Bearg · email · 2018-01-11 · oppose · source packet

amazon/wholefoods
Hello I am writing in opposition to the CUP for the Amazon/Wholefoods at 1600 Jackson Street. There has become an increase in noise over utilizing the space not only as a Wholefoods but also as fulfillment center for Amazon. It has already been divulged that the space will contain lockers for Amazon but now there is noise about utilizing some of the space as a fulfillment center. The fact is Amazon has not been tran… show more

Peter Foller · email · 2018-01-11 · support · source packet

Re: 1600 Jackson Street, Whole Foods 365 Conditional Use Application
SF Planning Commissioners-- The major property at 1600 Jackson St. has been sitting derelict for about 3 years now. Why? For the great majority of this time, a willing property owner and a willing tenant have been hung up in The City<U+2019>s labyrinth of <U+201C>due process<U+201D> and delay despite every survey of individual residents in the neighborhood heavily favoring having this grocery stor… show more

Maureen Brown · email · 2018-01-11 · support · source packet

1600 Jackson Street, Whole Foods 365 CU Application
Dear San Francisco Planning Commissioners, I am a 25-year resident and a bicycle commuter. The Whole Foods 365 proposal is a necessary and desirable project as it would not only rehabilitate and re-use an existing space, It would cut down on the car traffic by being in a location with so many residents/future customers in walking and biking distance. This is therefore a chance to help the environment in two ways: f… show more

2018-01-25 · 1 comments · 0 / 1

Sam Mogannam · email · 2018-01-25 · oppose · source packet

Amazon Whole Foods at 1600 Jackson
Dear Commissioners, Supervisor Peskin, John and Nicholas As a long time business owner and native San Franciscan, I urge you to oppose the development of the 1600 Jackson site as a future Amazon location. Over the past several years, I have seen the fabric of our communities, the heart of which are our neighborhood commercial districts, get torn apart. We<U+2019>ve all seen many of our cherished legacy busi… Dear Commissioners, Supervisor Peskin, John and Nicholas As a long time business owner and native San Franciscan, I urge you to oppose the development of the 1600 Jackson site as a future Amazon location. Over the past several years, I have seen the fabric of our communities, the heart of which are our neighborhood commercial districts, get torn apart. We<U+2019>ve all seen many of our cherished legacy businesses close. San Francisco needs to take a leadership role in doing everything it can to encourage small, independent, locally owned business to thrive in our great city. Companies like Amazon have proven to be a force of community disruption, creating an illusion of price and convenience which no small business can compete with, and they have been the cause of many small business closures around the country. They have also contributed to a reduction in foot traffic, which creates opportunities for neighbors to meet, facilitating true community building. The other negative impact is the reduction in direct consumer to business owner relationship building, a cornerstone for any society. Every community deserves and needs to have a direct relationship with their supplier of food and services, as opposed to having that connection occur thru a web app. There is nothing personal about Amazon<U+2019>s operations and there is nothing that they do that enriches our community. Furthermore, this project will create a traffic and parking nightmare on a street not designed to support the volume that Amazon will generate. This will further exacerbate the existing merchants<U+2019> success. Instead, I encourage you to support building more housing, esp affordable, which we desperately need. It would be great if the developer/owner of the project pushed their 2014 housing application forward, as we feel this would be the best use of this space. In the spirit of full transparency, we have considered this neighborhood for a future Bi-Rite, having looked at both the Real Foods space and the old Big Apple Grocery store space. The prospect of a Whole Foods-Amazon 365 store on that block has been significant factor for us in deciding whether we should move forward. I hope you will consider our view and the view of many of the other merchants and neighborhood associations in the area. Thanks, Sam Mogannam Bi-Rite Family of Businesses creating community through foodTM 3639 18th Street San Francisco, CA 94110 [phone removed] ext 8601 www.biritemarket.com follow us on twitter: @biritesf @sammogannam @eatgoodfoodbook Co-author of EAT GOOD FOOD: a grocer's guide to shopping, cooking, and creating community through foodshow more

2018-02-01 · 1 comments · 0 / 1

Rachel Hyden · email · 2018-02-01 · oppose · source packet

RE: 1600 Jackson Street: Please Consider Impact to Transit
Dear President Hillis and Commissioners, On behalf of San Francisco Transit Riders (SFTR), I<U+2019>m writing you today to encourage your consideration of the needs of current and future 19 Polk transit riders and the potential impact to their service in relation to the proposed reuse of building 1600 Jackson Street as an Amazon/Whole Foods 365 grocery store. Specifically, I write with apprehension of the p… show more

2018-03-01 · 2 comments · 1 / 1

Robert Bluhm · email · 2018-03-01 · support · source packet

1600 Jackson St Whole Foods 365 CU Application February 26, 2018
Dear San Francisco Planning Commissioners: I am writing to express strong support for the Whole Foods 365 project proposed for 1600 Jackson St. A mid-sized grocery store of this type is needed to serve the surrounding community and multiple surveys have indicated overwhelming support. The existing options for my family and many neighbors are inadequate, requiring a significant walk or a drive for access. The closest … Dear San Francisco Planning Commissioners: I am writing to express strong support for the Whole Foods 365 project proposed for 1600 Jackson St. A mid-sized grocery store of this type is needed to serve the surrounding community and multiple surveys have indicated overwhelming support. The existing options for my family and many neighbors are inadequate, requiring a significant walk or a drive for access. The closest store, Real Foods on Polk, is not competitive with WF365 in terms of price, quality or variety. I believe a WF365 would bring to life a longstanding vacancy and significantly increase foot traffic to the overall benefit of Polk St. As I understand it, a CU approval is required because Whole Foods is a chain, and that a non-chain grocery would be able to proceed as-of-right. Therefore the CU should specifically address why a Whole Foods is <U+201C>necessary and desirable<U+201D> with respect to its <U+201C>chain<U+201D> aspects (and not whether a hypothetical housing project would be better). The WF365 pricing and stability is superior to many of the upscale non-chain grocery stores in San Francisco. Community meeting space will be available on the facility<U+2019>s 2nd floor. Whole Foods has also committed well beyond the call of duty to working with other nearby vendors such as Cheese Plus and the Jug Shop to minimize several product or service overlaps. No other non-formula grocery has made a proposal. The strong desirability of housing is undeniable but that is not mandated for this site, is not the proposal at hand, and should not be part of a determination whether or not to approve this project. As the capital investment of this project is relatively modest, approval of WF365 would not at all preclude a future mixed-use project, if down the road a developer finds that advantageous. As seen in the recent failure to secure a grocery in Hayes Valley, it is a major challenge to attract a mid-sized quality grocery, chain or non-chain, and this superb opportunity, clearly supported by the community, should be seized upon without any further delay. Thank you for your consideration. Robert and Claudia Bluhm 74 Macondray Ln SF 94133 Sent from my iPhoneshow more

Adam Mayer · email · 2018-03-01 · oppose · source packet

MPNA Opposition Letter & Graphic Exhibits for 1600 Jackson St CUA
Dear Mr. Foster, Please see attached a PDF of graphic exhibits and accompanying letter explaining why the Middle Polk Neighborhood Association opposes the proposed conditional use authorization for the Whole Foods 365 proposal at 1600 Jackson Street. Regards, Adam Mayer MPNA Director of Planning & Design -- Adam N. Mayer AIA, LEED AP BD+C [email removed]

2018-03-29 · 1 comments · 0 / 1

Body Harmony · email · 2018-03-29 · oppose · source packet

Opposing Whole Foods 365 Store on Polk and Jackson
To Whom It May Concern, I strongly oppose the Whole Foods 365/AMAZON store on Polk and Jackson. This will create transportation and parking nightmares only adding to the current terrible situation the city has created with bus depots and The Van Ness Project taking up more parking spaces. Bus number 27 and 12 currently have terminals on the block and tend to back up as it is already ! It is not uncommon for there t… show more

2018-04-12 · 8 comments · 8 / 0

A Thilges · email · 2018-04-12 · support · source packet

Case No. 2016-000378CUA, 1600 Jackson St.
I am a homeowner at 1650 Jackson St, next door to the proposed whole Foods 365 at 1600 Jackson St. I, my family, and my neighbors fully support the Whole Foods project. Please do not allow the building at 1600 Jackson St. to be torn down. Many buildings in our neighborhood have recently been torn down and replaced with modern styled high rise buildings. This is changing the character of our neighborhood, which is… show more

Andrew Nelson · email · 2018-04-12 · support · source packet

Case# 2016-000378cua. 1600 jackson st
I am in favor of Whole Foods. We need a grocery store in the neighborhood and i do not want more housing and a new building put up. Andrew Nelson 1650 Jackson street # 602 SF. CA 94109 Sent from my iPad

Bill Freund · email · 2018-04-12 · support · source packet

Case No. 2016-000378CUA, 1600 Jackson St.
Hello, I'm writing to strongly support the application of Whole Foods 365 Market to operate at 1600 Jackson Street, as resident who lives next door at 1650 Jackson Street (where I've lived for over 15 years). Some main reasons for my support: The space has been vacant for years, and it's attracting criminal activity. The neighborhood needs a market there, to allow people nearby to walk instead of d… show more

Carol Ann Rogers · email · 2018-04-12 · support · source packet

Letter of Support - WF365 at 1600 Jackson Street
Dear Mr. Ionin, Attached please find a second letter from Russian Hill Neighbors in support of the conditional use of 1600 Jackson Street by Whole Foods for a WF365 grocery store. A previous letter of support was submitted in 2016. Thank you for adding this to the Commission<U+2019>s file in preparation for the upcoming April 26 Hearing on Case #2016-000378CUA. Carol Ann Rogers For RHN

John Addeo · email · 2018-04-12 · support · source packet

Case No. 2016-000378CUA 1600-Jackson Street
April 10, 2018 Members of the Planning Commission San Francisco Planning Department 1650 Mission Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94103 RE: CASE NO. 2016-000378CUA Dear Members of the Planning Commission: My wife and I own a condo in 1650 Jackson Street., which is next door to the proposed Whole Foods 365 Market at Jackson and Polk Streets. We are both in total support of this project and are looking … April 10, 2018 Members of the Planning Commission San Francisco Planning Department 1650 Mission Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94103 RE: CASE NO. 2016-000378CUA Dear Members of the Planning Commission: My wife and I own a condo in 1650 Jackson Street., which is next door to the proposed Whole Foods 365 Market at Jackson and Polk Streets. We are both in total support of this project and are looking for it to become a reality after living next to a vacant building for the past three years. Our building and many other condo buildings in the area are overwhelmingly in support of this project as are the many, many neighbors we have spoken to about this for the last two years, since this proposed project came to all of our attention. We support this project for the following reasons: 1) We believe that there are too many vacant storefronts between Broadway and California Streets on Polk and that we need an anchor store to keep our smaller businesses afloat as well as the restaurants in the neighborhood. If you look at Chestnut Street, for example, chain stores co-exist well with small businesses and it is one of the most efficient shopping streets in the city and highly successful. 2) Since the demise of The Big Apple store on Polk and Washington Streets, with NO efforts for anyone to open it, there is not a walkable, affordable, grocery store in our neighborhood. We are lucky to have such businesses as The Cheese Shop and Bel Campo meats but these are not full service stores, nor are they affordable for everyday shopping for most people in this neighborhood. We believe that having a Whole Foods 365 store there would aid in bringing MORE shoppers to not only these businesses but ALL of the businesses on Polk Street. 3) Our neighborhood has not caught a breath since the massive amount of new housing development has taken place around the Polk Street vicinity. We know that developers are eyeing many properties on Van Ness Avenue as well as on Polk (i.e. the large parcel where The Jug Shop now resides, is now under consideration by developers.) For that reason, density has increased which is another reason we need to increase our services with a full service grocery store being at the top of the list! 4) Whole Foods has impressed us with their neighborhood outreach and has worked extensively with our building and our neighborhood to mitigate potential problems with increased traffic and deliveries. Historically, the Lombardi store and their parking garage have never been a problem for the neighborhood. Since Lombardi's left, the parking garage has continued to operate without creating any problems for us. We also believe that WF365 will be more organized and respectful in terms of deliveries than the former Lombardi's owners. We have seen their delivery schedule and found that they took all of the neighborhood concerns into consideration. Very Impresssive. 5) We would like you to know that the MPNA does not represent me nor our neighborhood even though it implies it does. MPNA conducts little outreach to the neighborhood and has not polled our neighbors as other neighborhood associations , such as the Russian Hill association has done with their neighbors about this project. 6) The fact that Whole Foods 365 plans to open up the second floor of 1600 Jackson as a public meeting space would be a welcome amenity for the neighborhood. 7) This empty storefront has impacted our building in a very large way. For the first time, we had to install security cameras as we experienced many lobby thefts and people have gotten into our building to break into cars in our garage which could have been very threatening situations for our residents here. Constant calls to 311, for homeless and homeless encampments around that empty building. We need the extra foot traffic and security that Whole Foods 365 would bring along with a more vibrant, lively streetscape on Polk Street. 8) Finally, we believe that 1600 Jackson Street is a viable building and perfect for its new life as a Whole Foods 365 store. We find it wasteful to destroy a building which has not outlived its usefulness and could provide a much needed service to the neighborhood for a long time to come. Thank you for your consideration, Jon and Barbara Addeo 1650-Jackson Street, apt # 705 San Francisco, CA, 94109 [email removed] [phone removed]show more

Kiran Vajapey · email · 2018-04-12 · support · source packet

Whole Foods 365 Market on Jackson Street - REFERENCE CASE NO. 2016-000378CUA, 1600 JACKSON ST
Dear Aaron, I am a resident at 1800 Washington Street, part of the Pacific Place complex. I am writing in reference to: CASE NO. 2016-000378CUA, 1600 JACKSON ST. I would like to show my support for the planned Whole Foods 365 market. I believe this would be a fantastic addition to the neighborhood and would benefit residents and residents of nearby areas greatly. We would love to have a convenient and reputable … show more

Richard Cardello · email · 2018-04-12 · support · source packet

WHOLE FOODS 365 CONDITIONAL USE HEARING 04-26-2019 CASE 2016-000378CUA
April 11, 2018 San Francisco Planning Commission 1650 Mission Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, California 94103 [email removed] RE: Case No. 2016-000378CUA HEARING DATE 04-26-2018 WHOLE FOODS 365, 1600 JACKSON AT POLK, CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION Dear Planning Commissioners: I am writing to you, once again, in support of the long-wanted Whole Foods 365 which many are hoping will occupy the already existing 16… April 11, 2018 San Francisco Planning Commission 1650 Mission Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, California 94103 [email removed] RE: Case No. 2016-000378CUA HEARING DATE 04-26-2018 WHOLE FOODS 365, 1600 JACKSON AT POLK, CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION Dear Planning Commissioners: I am writing to you, once again, in support of the long-wanted Whole Foods 365 which many are hoping will occupy the already existing 1600 Jackson Street commercial building. The reasons for this continued support are many. For me, the most compelling reason is: my friends and neighbors overwhelmingly WANT IT! In the context of the Conditional Use hearing, it is both desirable and necessary and it benefits the community. Also, I have a personal request; when listening to public comments, please consider the addresses of the speakers. My observation is that many opponents of Whole Foods do not live in the actual neighborhood that wants this neighborhood-serving market. Recently, I heard that Hayes Valley residents were disappointed when their efforts to have a neighborhood-serving market were unsuccessful, due to the anticipated tenant having pulled out. If they want a market, I hope they get one. I would appreciate the same consideration from them, and their support rather than their opposition. Please approve the Conditional Use application for this project. Thank you, Richard Cardello 999 Green Street #903 San Francisco CA 94133 CCS: John Rahaim Director of Planning [email removed] District 3 Supervisor Aaron Peskin [email removed] SF Planner assigned to this project [email removed] RICH HILLIS Commission President [email removed] MYRNA MELGAR Commission Vice-President [email removed] RODNEY FONG Commissioner [phone removed] [email removed] MILICENT A. JOHNSON Commissioner [email removed] JOEL KOPPEL Commissioner [email removed] KATHRIN MOORE Commissioner [email removed] DENNIS RICHARDS Commissioner [email removed] RUSSIAN HILL NEIGHBORS [email removed]show more

Kay Rousseau · email · 2018-04-12 · support · source packet

Case #2016-000378CUA
I am writing to express my strong support for the Whole Foods 365 at 1600 Jackson St @ Polk. Our neighborhood needs and deserves this high quality retail store. The ideal location allows for walking to & from for many, many neighbors. Allowing certain individuals to block the development of this site for their own self serving interests would be a real shame. Thank you for considering my email in your deliberat… show more

2018-04-19 · 8 comments · 7 / 1

Lorri Ungaretti · email · 2018-04-19 · support · source packet

1600 Polk Street: Case No. 2016-000378CUA
Dear San Francisco Planning Commissioners, We have been waiting for a few years now, and I hope you can help me. I<U+2019>m talking about the former Lombardi<U+2019>s site at 1600 Polk Street at Jackson. I completely support the placement of a Whole Foods 365 market in that spot. We have had almost no place close by where we can buy groceries. (Yes, I know that Real Food Company is just several blocks awa… show more

Ted Olsson · email · 2018-04-19 · support · source packet

Commission Update for the Week of April 16, 2018 Good morning. Please find a memo attached that outlines items before commissions and boards for this week. Let me know if you have any questions or concerns. Francis Francis Tsang Deputy Chief of Staff Office of Mayor Mark Farrell City and County of San Francisco [phone removed] | [email removed] ~E~EIVED Dear Planning Commission <U+2014>Jonas P. lonin 4.16.18 APR 18 2018 I'm writing to voice my vote in favor of WF 365 - Thank you in advance for your time and consideration - ~~~'Y 8 COUNTS OF S.F. pLANNI GPC~p~ TMENT There are three key reasons why I'm in favor and encourage the planning commission to vote in favor as well. 1. Our neighborhood contains one of the densest populations in SF, particularly following the many recent additions of new condominium and apartment projects. There are plans for continued development along Van Ness as well Polk and Pacific. We need affordable and walkable options to support the growth of the neighborhood. Currently, I have to drive to Trader Joes or Safeway to buy my groceries. Real Foods is not an option as it is too expensive. 2. I also believe and have talked to many of the local store owners that having a branded store like WF will create more foot traffic and bridge the activity from RH to Polk Gulch ultimately better serving the entire Polk street area. Chestnut Street and Hayes Street both benefit from chain stores helping local, boutique stores to thrive. 3. Sustainability: The building still has over 25 years of building life. believe WF would be a good neighborhood partner as they have consistently demonstrated their willingness to listen and make compromises to support moving forward. Examples: Working with the Cheese Board to offer a marketing venue for them to offer their catering services, working with the jug shop to minimize offerings to allowing higher margin, premium products to be purchased from the Jug shop. Extended offering to make the upstairs a community meeting area. On a less positive note, it has been VERY concerning that MPNA has not actively polled the residents or all of the local shops. They are misrepresenting their constituents stating they are not in favor. Thank you for your time and consideration - Regards, Leslie A. Bull 1650 Jackson street [phone removed] % ~ ~,
Leslie A. Bull Mayor's Office of Housing and Community Development City and County of San Francisco Mark Farrell Mayor Kate Hartley Director April 1~,, 2018 Dear 730 Stanyan Neighbor*: The City and County of San Francisco (the "City") recently purchased the former McDonald's site located at 730 Stanyan. You may be aware that the Mayor's Office of Housing and Community Development ("MOHCD… Leslie A. Bull Mayor's Office of Housing and Community Development City and County of San Francisco Mark Farrell Mayor Kate Hartley Director April 1~,, 2018 Dear 730 Stanyan Neighbor*: The City and County of San Francisco (the "City") recently purchased the former McDonald's site located at 730 Stanyan. You may be aware that the Mayor's Office of Housing and Community Development ("MOHCD") has future plans to develop the site into affordable housing. Since the development process will take several years, we also plan to create a temporary use for the site until the housing can be built. We're sending you. this letter to invite your input on the interim use. Our first step in the process will be to convene a community meeting, and we've scheduled it for Thursday, April 26, 2018, 6pm <U+2014> 8pm, at the Park Branch Library Community Room, 1833 Page Street. We hope you can join us. The second step is demolition of the McDonald's building, which must be complete by June 8, 2018, according to the terms of the City's and McDonald's purchase and sale agreement. Through the community process (which will include at least one additional meeting after April 26t"), we'll determine the best interim use and.. work immediately to install it once demolition is complete. We expect that the interim use will be in place for three to five years. This 3-5 year interim use period is also the "predevelopment" phase for the future affordable housing. During this time, MOHCD will select a developer, work with neighbors to design the building and grounds (including, for example, height, width, and ground floor uses), and finalize the program for the intended residents of the housing (for example, the building may become home to families, seniors, people experiencing homelessness, transitional age youth, middle-income households, or seniors). Our goal is to conclude the planning no later than 2023 and begin construction. We value the input of all 730 Stanyan's neighbors and look forward to seeing you on Apri126~'. If you are unable to attend, please feel free to send questions or comments to: [email removed] Thanks in advance for your engagement and participation. Sincerely, Kate Hartley Director *Need help with translation? Please send an email to: [email removed]. One South Van Ness Avenue, Fifth Floor, San Frantisto, CA 94103 Phone: [phone removed] Fax: [phone removed] TDD:[phone removed] www.sfmohtd.org ..~, t _ ~ <U+2022>: F ."~' ' ' ;','~~., U.S. POSTAGE'S ~rNEv eowEs H EN <U+2022>i ~<U+2022>~ /~ ~ ~i~ MOHCD One South Van Ness Avenue ~ti a N ~ , ~ ; ~, ,_ '~ ZIP 94103 ~ 000.37$ 02 1YV ~ 5 Floor i~U ~<U+2022>~ r 0001395504 APR 13 2018 San Francisco, CA 94103 ~~~~V~ ~- APR 1 6 2018 ~::~ ~ i '~~ ,,~~, ~ t~~ ~'~tl1~Y San Francisco Planning Commission JL~.t ~ ~F ~ ~ 1650 Mission Street ~ CI ~_'~ p~gti!NING AUMINISTRATfQN San Francisco, CA 94103 :...: .. ......-;::: ~::a ~~:i::3.:~.;~::~ i~,ii~l~iii,~iu:i,i.ii,~llill~~~~n~t~il~il~i~l~linl~~t~~i~~i,~ David McIenzie 855 Folsom Street #905 San Francisco, CA 94107 March 27, 2018 RECEIVED APR 13X018 CITY &COUNTY OF S.F. PLANNING DEPARTMENT CPC/HPC M r. Jonas P. lonin Commission Secretary San Francisco Planning Commission 1650 Mission Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94103 RE: Central SoMa Plan Proposed Community Facilities District Long-Term Capital Funding For Yerba Buena Gardens Capital Improvements Dear Mr. lonin and Honorable San Francisco Planning Commissioners: Yerba Buena Gardens is the greatest Community and Civic Treasure of Central South of Market! I 197,250 children from SOMA, the entire City, and tourists delight daily in its wonderful Playground every year, and soon to be expanded with a separate Tot Lot. I More than 150,000 school children and families visit its Children's Creativity Museum annually and Children's Creativity LeRoy King Carousel I 87,000 families and San Franciscans of all ages enjoy its popular Ice Rink and Bowling Center each year. I 146,200 City residents and visitors from around the Nation and the World come each year to its Center for the Arts Gallery and Theater for their extraordinary variety of art installations and live performances. I 88,000 City residents come annually to its major Civic and Special Events, such as the annual Pistahan Festival and the Celebration of Martin Luther King's Birthday before the stunning fountain named in his honor. I Just under 100,000 Central City residents and workers enjoy the extensive series of free outdoor m usical performances presented by Yerba Buena Arts Gardens Festival in its beautiful Esplanade Park each year. I And annually more than 25,000 of the Yerba Buena Neighborhood's elders first arrive in the morning during the year for exercise, Tai Chi, or just the solace of this peaceful Gardens. Due to dissolution of the former Redevelopment Agency, the City will assume ownership of the Gardens and its buildings this year. To ensure that the Gardens will continue to always be the special community and City-resident focused public amenity it has been these last 25 years, the stakeholder organizations of our Yerba Buena Neighborhood have formed the nonprofit The Yerba Buena Gardens Conservancy to master-lease and operate the Gardens from that point forward. We are now in the process of finalizing the provisions of that master lease with the City's Department of Real Estate. One absolutely key issue to resolve is long-term funding for the Gardens open spaces and buildings' physical renovation needs over the next 30 years. The Office of Community Investment and Infrastructure has just estimated that amount at $90,000,000 total, spread out over that time period. Fortunately the existing and anticipated sources of funding for Gardens operations, programs, and renovations are projected to cover most of that amount <U+2014>about $70,000,000. But that leaves a significant $20,000,000 gap with no identifiable source. Both the City and the Conservancy agree it is not fiscally responsible to have no financial plan to cover the full amount needed. The Central SoMa Plan's proposed Community Facilities District certainly can fill this gap. Asa City- owned property, the Gardens will be fully eligible for application of its Mello-Roos funding over coming decades. Our request is that this minimum amount of $20,000,000 now be included in its projected long-term budget that will be part of the overall Central SoMa Plan to be approved by this Commission, our City Board of Supervisors, and our Mayor. Sincerely, David McKenzie Yerba Buena District Resident and South of Market Childcare Board Member JOHN M. MAHONEY RECEIVED 2 MERRILL DRIVE APR 12 201 MORAGA, CA 94556 CITY &COUNTY OF S.F. PLANNING DEPARTMENT CPC/HPC Apri19, 2018 San Francisco Planning Commission San Francisco Planning Department Jonas P. Ionin, Commission Secretary 1650 Mission Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94103 Aaron Peskin Supervisor, District 3 1 Dr. Carlton Goodlett Place, Rm 244 San Francisco, CA 94102-4689 Re: Case No. 2016-000378CUA, 1600 Jackson Street Dear Members of the Planning Commission and Supervisor Peskin, As an owner of a unit in the 1650 Jackson Street building, I am writing in support of the application to open a Whole Foods 365 Market ("Whole Foods") at 1600 Jackson Street, Case No. 2016-000378CUA. Our Russian Hill/lower Pacific Heights neighborhood will benefit from the opening of afull-service market that will serve the needs of our community. The opening of the proposed market is especially needed since the closure of The Big Apple market on Polk Street. The Whole Foods market will be within walking distance for residents of our building and many of our neighbors. This is important because many of our older neighbors do not own cars or are no longer able to drive. For customers who may need to drive, they will be able to use the 70 space underground parking garage on the premises. The availability of these underground parking spaces will alleviate congestion on Polk, Jackson, and surrounding streets. For many years I was a resident of the Fontana East at 1000 North Point Street. If there had been a Whole Foods market at 1600 Jackson Street during the time I lived on North Point Street, I would have shopped there for groceries. Thank you for your attention to this letter. Please feel free to call me at 925-376- 3015 or e-mail me at mahoney123C~comcast.net if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, John M. Mahoney cc: 1650 Jackson Street Homeowners Association c/o Chandler Properties April 14, 2018 SAIV FRANCISCCJ PLANNING COMMISSION SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING DEPARTMf(VT lONAS F. I~NiN, COMMISSION SECRETARY 1650 MISSION STREET, SUITE 400 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94103 REFERENCE BASE NO. 2Q16-0~0378CUA, 1600 JACKSON ST. ~~C~11/ED APR 1$ 2018 ~~~' &COUNTY pF S,F ~'I.ANNING DEPAgTMENT CPC/HPC AM HADICAPPED ANQ AM ABLE TO DECLARE THAT I AM IN FAVOR OF HAVING THE 365 WHOLE FOQDS Pv+iARKET CQfViE INTO EXlSTANCE. PLEASE MAKE IT HAPPEN. THANK YOU, ~ ~ ~ ~ JERRY CHAN 1800 WASHINGTON ST. #51~ SAN FRANCISCO. CA 94109-3583 ~~ ~ ~~ 1$4~?RA1'~~lk~~t~.1 is>61tif:" .l<U+2022>~: 4prii 14, 2018 ~~cE~~E APR 18 20 SAN FRANCISCt~ PLANNING COMMESSiON SAN FRANCISCO ~EANNING DEPARTN9ENT 10NAS P. IONfN, CQMM[SSION SECRETARY 1650 MISSfON STREET, SUITE 40Q SAN FRANCISCO, CA 941Q3 REFERENCE CASE NO. 2016-QQ0378CUA, 1600 lACKS~N ST. AM REALLY IN FAV~R QF HAVING THE 365 WHC?LE FtJQDS kV1ARKET CQi~tlE INTO EXISTANCE. PLEASE DO VOTE EN FAVOR OF ET. f1:I~1 ~I:~'[il~l r ~~~ ~~~ KI(~~BERLY CHAN 1840 WASHlNGTflN ST. #303 SAfV FRANCISCO, CA 94109-3J45 ci7.~, ~ 18 p~NNCO/NP R M~FS.F c r : ~li~; ~; ~ ~?al'a ., C:. t.! rn 4pril 14, 2018 DECEIVED APR 1 8 2018 SAN FRANCISCO PLANNING COMMISSiQN SAN FRANCISCO? PlANNINC~ OEPARTh11ENT JO~UAS P. IONiN, C)M#VlIS510N SECRETARY 165Q iV11SSION STREET, SUITE 400 SAN FRANClSC~, CA 94103 CITY &COUNTY OF S.F PLANNING DEPARTMENT CPC/HPC REFERENCE CASE NO. 2016-OQ0378CUA, 160Q 1RCKSON ST. 1 AM REALLY IN FAVOR C?F HAVING THE 365 WHALE FOQDS MARKET, PLEASE MAKE IT A REALITY. THANK YOU, ~ r ~M, ~-r MINA RAlPUT 180Q WASHINGTON ST. #512 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 941i~9-3583 ~~~1~ ~ ~ r~~l~, :~,~ ~c> ~~T~t1c7,:, u ~~-t~~.~ TL1~"ri t ' fer~-?(~ ~.,'bit~~il':l~.rshow more

Chandra Chaterji · email · 2018-04-19 · support · source packet

1600 Jackson Street: 2016-000378CUA
Members of the Planning Commission San Francisco Planning Department 1650 Mission Street Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94103 With regards to: 1600 Jackson Street, Whole Foods 365 CU Application Dear San Francisco Planning Commissioners, I am a condominium owner and live diagonally across Polk Street from the proposed Whole Foods 365 site at Jackson and Polk. I have lived here for over 26 years. I am writing in su… Members of the Planning Commission San Francisco Planning Department 1650 Mission Street Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94103 With regards to: 1600 Jackson Street, Whole Foods 365 CU Application Dear San Francisco Planning Commissioners, I am a condominium owner and live diagonally across Polk Street from the proposed Whole Foods 365 site at Jackson and Polk. I have lived here for over 26 years. I am writing in support of the Whole Foods 365 application. I believe that a grocery store at 1600 Jackson St is both necessary and desirable. First, the neighborhood wants such a store. Various surveys of residents in the immediate neighborhood show overwhelming support of such a store. Findings of these surveys have been previously submitted to the Commission. It would seem that overwhelming neighborhood support would make such a store both necessary and desirable. Second, the neighborhood needs a relatively value priced grocery store with a wide assortment of items. Whole Foods 365 promises just that. News stories about other Whole Foods 365 stores in the country show that this is indeed how the 365 operation is being run--wide, fresh assortment with value prices. None of the other food stores on Polk Street meet the criteria of being value-priced with a wide assortment. And, Amazon's recent purchase of Whole Foods would guarantee that value pricing would remain a guiding principle of the store. Additionally, 365 is Whole Foods' innovative offering for young people. This is very much the up and coming demographic in this neighborhood. (The argument that Polk Gulch senior citizens should just walk up and down rather steep hills from Polk Gulch to the Trader Joe's and Whole Foods on California Street are ageist, to say the least, and is not considered here.) These facts make the Whole Foods 365 necessary and desirable for the neighborhood. Third, there is empirical evidence that shows that quality stores such as Starbucks and, to some extent, Dunkin<U+2019> Donuts, (and, by extension, Whole Foods 365) are good for property values of homes in the vicinity, making it very desirable if not necessary for homeowners like me. (See the economic analysis in Spencer Rascoff and Stan Humphries, Zillow Talk, 2016, New York NY: Grand Central Publishing (a division of Hachette Book Group), pages 49-54 and reported by CNN http://money.cnn.com/2015/03/04/real_estate/starbucks-home- values/index.html.) Fourth, the Whole Foods 365 would rehabilitate and re-use an existing space rather than demolishing it and adding to the pollution and congestion in the neighborhood in the process. Fifth, quick completion of the Whole Foods 365 is the fastest option to bring life to the corner property that has been vacant for many years now. Completion would bring foot traffic to the area, and, therefore, additional business to existing neighborhood businesses and restaurants. Yours truly, Chandra S. Chaterjishow more

Leslie Bull · email · 2018-04-19 · support · source packet

CASE-NO: 2016-000378CUA. 1600 Jackson street
Dear Commissions Secretary I'm writing to voice my vote in favor of WF 365 - There are three key reasons why I'm in favor and encourage the planning commission to vote in favor as well. 1. Our neighborhood contains one of the densest populations in SF, particularly following the many recent additions of new condominium and apartment projects. There are plans for continued development along Van Ness … show more

Scott Noble · email · 2018-04-19 · support · source packet

1600 Jackson Street, Case NO. 2016-000378CUA
City Planning Commission, Please accept this letter as my STRONG vote in favor of the Whole Foods 365 Store proposed for the empty building site at 1600 Jackson Street. I have owned a residence at 1650 Jackson Street for 5+ years now. In that time Lombardi's closed it's doors and I've watched my block turn from a vibrant neighborhood center to a center for crime, homeless encampments and disgusti… show more

Chris Baker · email · 2018-04-19 · support · source packet

Please allow Whole Foods 365 at 1600 Jackson!
Dear Planning Commissioners, I'm writing as a homeowner who lives around the corner from the proposed Whole Foods 365 proposed for 1600 Jackson Street to express my very strong approval for the project, and my hopes that it will be okayed. There is a strong need for this type of food market in this neighborhood, particularly for my wife, who has mobility problems. The current markets are too small with not … show more

Paul Kretchmer · email · 2018-04-19 · support · source packet

CASE NO. 2016-000378CUA, 1600 JACKSON ST
Planning Commission: WE ARE STRONGLY IN FAVOR AND IN SUPPORT OF THE WHOLE FOODS 365 MARKET OCCUPYING THE VACANT LOMBARDI SPORTS BUILDING. My wife and I are seniors and the neighborhood population is aging so we need more conveniently located services, in particular a full-service grocery store. Since the closure of The Big Apple on Polk St., we are lacking a full- service, affordable grocery store. We do have some … show more

Joshua S. Devore · email · 2018-04-19 · oppose · source packet

1600 Jackson Street
Dear Commissioners, Mr. Ionin and Mr. Foster: Please see the attached comment letter on behalf of our client, Tony Vargas, and accompanying letter of Keith B. Higgins, PE, TE related to the pending conditional use permit application for 1600 Jackson Street noticed for hearing on April 26. We appreciate your consideration of the attached and are available for any questions you may have. Respectfully, Joshua S. … show more

2018-04-26 · 73 comments · 32 / 41

Paul Colletta · spoken · 2018-04-26 · support

Support

Patricia Bittrick · spoken · 2018-04-26 · oppose

Opposed, wrong location, traffic

Izzy Bokser · spoken · 2018-04-26 · support

Support

Amy Bearg · spoken · 2018-04-26 · oppose

Negative impacts

Lisa Fromer · spoken · 2018-04-26 · oppose

Housing

Ozzie Rohm · spoken · 2018-04-26 · oppose

Housing

Cassie Shouger · spoken · 2018-04-26 · support

Support, safety

Bob Cam · spoken · 2018-04-26 · support

Need a grocery store

Jody Knight · spoken · 2018-04-26 · support

Project presentation

Kunal Patel · email · 2018-04-26 · support · source packet

1600 Jackson Street, Whole Foods 365 CU Application - In Favor
Dear San Francisco Planning Commission, I would like to communicate that I'm in favor of the Whole Foods 365 at Jackson and Polk. This space has been vacant for far too long and it is completely necessary and desirable by the neighborhood. I live right on that corner at 1650 Jackson and on a daily basis the past 3 years I've had garbage, feces and a slew of drugs on the corner because this huge piece o… show more

Jody Knight · email · 2018-04-26 · oppose · source packet

1600 Jackson Whole Foods TMP/Loading Analysis/Plans
Tam, please combine the attached documents into a single PDF and send to Nick. The Loading Analysis is Exhibit B. The plans are exhibit A. Nick, that means that there are two sets of plans because the plans are also an exhibit to the loading analysis. Let me know if you want me to eliminate Attachment A to the TMP. Thanks! ShareFile Attachments Expires May 20, 2018 1600 Jackson - 365 041918.pdf 24.4 MB 20556_… show more

Chris Gembinski · email · 2018-04-26 · oppose · source packet

Missing Letters for 1600 Jackson Packet
Nicholas, Attached are letters that were submitted to the Planning Commission from several community organizations that I did not see in the packet for 1600 Jackson Street. Could you please include the attached letters for the organized opposition. Please let me know if you have any questions Thank you, Chris Gembinski MPNA Chair [phone removed]

Kate Chase · email · 2018-04-26 · oppose · source packet

Amazon/WholeFoods 365, Please Oppose, Please
My name is Kate Chase and I am writing today to share with you my belief that Amazon/WholeFoods 365 should NOT be allowed to create a store at 1600 Jackson Street. As someone that is a part of this neighborhood, I am VERY stressed out that granting them approval will change the whole dynamic of our very unique community; and try as I might, I don<U+2019>t see how it will be for the better. Case in point … My name is Kate Chase and I am writing today to share with you my belief that Amazon/WholeFoods 365 should NOT be allowed to create a store at 1600 Jackson Street. As someone that is a part of this neighborhood, I am VERY stressed out that granting them approval will change the whole dynamic of our very unique community; and try as I might, I don<U+2019>t see how it will be for the better. Case in point that I recently overheard 2 gentlemen on the 14 bus talking about why they were heading to Russian Hill <U+2014> <U+201C>because it is the last truly unique San Francisco neighborhood<U+201D>. I would hate to see how it would alter descriptions of what trusted guidebooks and websites recently describe our destination as: <U+201C>This charming area channels a San Francisco from the past<U+2014>sidewalks are replaced by hidden stairways and residents ride the city<U+2019>s iconic cable cars. Cozy cafes and local-favorite watering holes round out this reserved neighborhood<U+2019>s cordial repertoire.<U+201D> "On Russian Hill, Polk Street is crowded with unusual boutiques, antique shops, trendy restaurants and night spots." "With the same stunning views as its ritzier neighbor Nob Hill, Russian Hill has a pace and vibe all its own: still posh, but the kind of place where everyone knows your name." "Russian Hill is a neighborhood with that rare advantage of being tucked away, yet central to almost everything. I feel lucky that from where I live I can walk to Union Square, the Marina, Pacific Heights, Aquatic Park, Chinatown, or North Beach in about 15 minutes. This is also a neighborhood that eludes stereotypes. If the Mission = hipsters, the Marina = yuppies, SOMA = techies, and the Haight = hippies, Russian Hill is just a bunch of great people coming together to eat free pizza on Monday nights at Robberbarron." In hearing that the commission would be meeting next week, I felt it important for me to now beg you to oppose this take over. Let them build in a part of the city that needs them for food, their commoditized 365 line. I also fear for those small businesses that would be negatively impacted by a predatory organization such as theirs, they would consume all our favorite independent shops that have worked so hard and need our undivided support. I can't stand what I believe would result in empty small business storefronts on Polk Street. Instead, please vote in a way that would allow for additional and much-needed housing. Thank you in advance for your consideration. Sincerely, Kate Chase 1335 Filbert Street, #204 SF CA 94109 [phone removed]show more

Ray Bair · email · 2018-04-26 · oppose · source packet

Letter of opposition - Amazon Whole Foods at 1600 Jackson St
Good Morning I'm writing today to express my opposition to Amazon's proposed development at 1600 Jackson St. I realize the Conditional Use hearing will occur this afternoon, but wanted to let you know this is a hot topic on our street. I am writing today with the support of dozens of small business owners and residents along the street who have asked me to tell you they too are opposed to the project. … Good Morning I'm writing today to express my opposition to Amazon's proposed development at 1600 Jackson St. I realize the Conditional Use hearing will occur this afternoon, but wanted to let you know this is a hot topic on our street. I am writing today with the support of dozens of small business owners and residents along the street who have asked me to tell you they too are opposed to the project. I am the owner of Cheese Plus, on the corner of Polk and Pacific, just 1 block away from the project site. While a relative newcomer to the street compared to my neighbors The Jug Shop, Molte Cose, Russian Hill Chiropractic, Studio Gallery, The Bell Tower, One Half, and others who have been in business for generations, I've witnessed a lot of positive change in the 13 years I've owned Cheese Plus. I've watched as new housing has sprung up in old, out of date, and underutilized properties. Just across the street from my store, where The Jug Shop once occupied, there is now a housing complex with 2 small retailers below - BelCampo and Basik Cafe - which are thriving. That once unattractive corner, is now home to many happy residents, and the street scene is lively and safe because the small businesses below make an engaging experience for the community. On Pacific, I've witnessed as a new development took over an old parking structure and former livery stable, transforming it into housing with 3 small businesses below. Again, what was once an unattractive and under utilized space, is now home to happy San Franciscans and unique high quality small businesses. You have an exciting opportunity before you today to strike a similar balance in our neighborhood at 1600 Jackson St, by denying Amazon their Conditional Use on the basis that the space should include housing. This project is completely out of scope for the neighborhood, as Amazon and it's "Amazon Effect" has done the most to drive small business out of existence. Renderings submitted by Amazon for the site show little effort to make the space more aesthetically pleasing. Instead offering a drab, industrial image of their logo above the entrance. This is not fitting for our unique and diverse street, and shows their cookie-cutter attitude, and lack of community outreach on this project. Amazon and Village Properties have had 2+ years to consider our request for housing above retail at the location. If they had agreed to consider this option, they might very well be in business today with happy residents above. Unfortunately, they have done little to work with the community, adopting a typical corporate stance that they know better and everything will be fine if we just let them do as they please. Don't be swayed by a posse of residents from far away atop Russian Hill. Their argument is anti-housing, and this is not their immediate neighborhood. Furthermore, that community is among the wealthiest in the city with mobility and means to shop anywhere they desire. Polk St is not a food desert with underprivileged residents and little choice for food shopping. But it is a vibrant and unique neighborhood unlike any other in the city. Please don't permanently destroy that uniqueness by allowing this ugly, over sized, corporate business to take over our community. Similar housing over small retail developments are occurring all around the city. I'm confident Village Properties con continue their original vision of housing at the site. If not, I'm sure another developer would be happy to take over the space, even perhaps including a retail grocer - preferably a local, independent business over a big box option. Regardless, I urge you to support small business and old-school San Francisco values, and deny Amazon Whole Foods 365 their Conditional Use today. Ray Bair Cheese Plus B est Cheese Shop in SF - San Francisco Magazine 2001 Polk St @ Pacific Ave San Francisco, CA 94109 [phone removed] cheeseplus.com facebook.com/cheeseplus instagram.com/cheeseplus blog.cheeseplus.comshow more

Adam Mayer · email · 2018-04-26 · oppose · source packet

Oppose Whole Foods 365 at 1600 Jackson
Dear Planning Commissioners: Over the past 2+ years I have sent you multiple letters on behalf of the Middle Polk Neighborhood Association detailing why we oppose the Whole Foods 365 proposal at 1600 Jackson Street. By now you probably have a good understanding of all the issues surrounding the proposal including, but not limited to: - The potential negative impact on small local Polk Street businesses - The des… Dear Planning Commissioners: Over the past 2+ years I have sent you multiple letters on behalf of the Middle Polk Neighborhood Association detailing why we oppose the Whole Foods 365 proposal at 1600 Jackson Street. By now you probably have a good understanding of all the issues surrounding the proposal including, but not limited to: - The potential negative impact on small local Polk Street businesses - The desire to build housing over retail on what is one of the last true "soft sites" in District 3 - The incompatibility of the proposal with the Polk Streetscape Project As this is hopefully my last message to you regarding this particular item, I would like to drive home one last point: you are the Planning Commission and your job, as stated on the Planning Commission website it to: "Advise the Mayor, Board of Supervisors and City departments on San Francisco's long-range goals, policies and programs on a broad array of issues related to land use, transportation, and current planning". Now, with that in mind, I would like you to take a look at the latest rendering of the proposal, released to the public by the project sponsor last week, and tell me that this project conforms with the city's current thinking on land use, transportation and current planning: What you see here in the image above is a suburban style big-box store with a 70-parking space garage in one of the densest and most walkable corners of the entire city. This block has a Walk Score of 98 and a Transit Score of 95. Why are we not building housing over retail here and why is this being proposed right in the midst of the Polk Streetscape Project construction? If the project sponsor had come to the neighborhood with a different proposal, say housing over a grocery store, we probably would not be having this debate. As both sides make their case this Thursday, I urge the Commission to uphold their duty to the city's current and future planning by rejecting this out-of-place proposal. Best Regards, Adam Mayer Polk Street Resident -- Adam N. Mayer AIA, LEED AP BD+C [email removed]show more

Jan Blum · email · 2018-04-26 · oppose · source packet

Whole Foods ?discount Band store on Polk Nicholas Foster: Please copy each of the Planning Commissioners on the following public comment. Thank you. Jan Blum, D-2, SF
To Planning Commissioners: Please OPPOSE THE CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION OF AMAZON WHOLE FOODS AT 1600 JACKSON. INSTEAD CHOOSE TO UTILIZE THIS SPACE AS HOUSING-OVER-LOCAL-BUSINESS IN ORDER TO BETTER SERVE THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOODS. There already exists sufficient retail grocery in the area (Amazon Whole Food on California and Franklin, Trader Joes on Hyde at California, and on North Point, Marina Safeway, North… show more

Jon Iddings · spoken · 2018-04-26 · support

Support

Jim Reuben · spoken · 2018-04-26 · support

Whole Foods

Janet Tarlov · spoken · 2018-04-26 · oppose

Opposed

Claudia Bluhm · spoken · 2018-04-26 · support

Neighborhood needs a grocery store

Kate Chase · spoken · 2018-04-26 · oppose

Opposed

Judith Roddy · spoken · 2018-04-26 · support

Neighborhood character, traffic

Esther Fishman · spoken · 2018-04-26 · oppose

Opposed

Molly Hoyt · spoken · 2018-04-26 · support

Support

Peter Fowler · spoken · 2018-04-26 · support

Support

Carol Ann Rodgers · spoken · 2018-04-26 · support

Full service grocery

Antoinette Banks · spoken · 2018-04-26 · support

Improve the neighborhood

Ray Bair · spoken · 2018-04-26 · oppose

Housing

Mario Yedidia · spoken · 2018-04-26 · oppose

Opposition

Teresa Nittelo · spoken · 2018-04-26 · oppose

Opposed to big box stares

Rebecca Evans · spoken · 2018-04-26 · oppose

Negative impacts

Chris Baker · spoken · 2018-04-26 · support

Support

Andrew Bieker · spoken · 2018-04-26 · oppose

Housing

Michael Priolo · spoken · 2018-04-26 · oppose

Opposition

Elaine Tasman · spoken · 2018-04-26 · oppose

Traffic impacts

Henry Karnilowicz · spoken · 2018-04-26 · oppose

Proximity to other markets

Miriam Zouzounis · spoken · 2018-04-26 · oppose

Local commercial corridor

Laura Clark · spoken · 2018-04-26 · oppose

Housing policies

Paul Webber · spoken · 2018-04-26 · oppose

Opposition

Todd Mavis · spoken · 2018-04-26 · oppose

Impact fees, missed opportunity

Joshua Devore · spoken · 2018-04-26 · oppose

CEQA exemption, non-complying use size

Tim McLaughlin · spoken · 2018-04-26 · oppose

Union organized opposition

Parker Austin · spoken · 2018-04-26 · oppose

Organized opposition

Chris Cambinsky · spoken · 2018-04-26 · oppose

Organized opposition

Rob Isaackson · spoken · 2018-04-26 · support

Owner presentation

Rob Twyman · spoken · 2018-04-26 · support

Whole Foods

Vasu Narayanan · spoken · 2018-04-26 · oppose

Real Foods

Greg Carr · spoken · 2018-04-26 · support

Support, activity

Lorri Ungaretti · spoken · 2018-04-26 · support

Support

Judi Basolo · spoken · 2018-04-26 · support

Walking distance

Greg McKenney · spoken · 2018-04-26 · support

Support

Roy Chan · spoken · 2018-04-26 · oppose

Oppositions housing

Stephanie Chang · spoken · 2018-04-26 · oppose

Traffic

Dale Mortenson · spoken · 2018-04-26 · oppose

Traffic congestion

Matthew Holmes · spoken · 2018-04-26 · support

Support

Sarah Taber · spoken · 2018-04-26 · support

Support

Stephen Taber · spoken · 2018-04-26 · support

Support

Duncan Why · spoken · 2018-04-26 · oppose

Opposed

Mitchell Beag · spoken · 2018-04-26 · oppose

Opposed

Rick Karp · spoken · 2018-04-26 · oppose

Trojan horse, future Amazon distribution centers

Marlayne Morgan · spoken · 2018-04-26 · support

Support

Jennifer Farris · spoken · 2018-04-26 · oppose

Opposed

Chris Schulman · spoken · 2018-04-26 · oppose

Housing

Dick Wayman · spoken · 2018-04-26 · support

Support

Chandra Chaterji · spoken · 2018-04-26 · support

Support

Diane Raike · spoken · 2018-04-26 · support

Support

Jim Warshell · spoken · 2018-04-26 · oppose

Housing

Jim Hirsch · spoken · 2018-04-26 · support

Support

Nick Cockcroft · spoken · 2018-04-26 · support

Support

Lorenzo Rios · spoken · 2018-04-26 · oppose

Traffic, housing

Leslie Bull · spoken · 2018-04-26 · support

Support

Stephen Cornell · spoken · 2018-04-26 · oppose

Congestion, housing

John Addeo · spoken · 2018-04-26 · support

Support

2018-05-03 · 1 comments · 1 / 0

Richard Cardello · email · 2018-05-03 · support · source packet

RE: WHOLE FOODS 365 CONDITIONAL USE HEARING 04-26-2019 CASE 2016-000378CUA
April 26, 2018 San Francisco Planning Commission 1650 Mission Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, California 94103 [email removed] RE: Case No. 2016-000378CUA HEARING DATE 04-26-2018 WHOLE FOODS 365, 1600 JACKSON AT POLK, CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION Commissioners: I am speaking in support of the Conditional Use Application to operate a Whole Foods 365 market at the site of the old Lombardi Sports on 1600 Jackson S… show more

2018-05-17 · 1 comments · 1 / 0

Camille Cusumano · email · 2018-05-17 · support · source packet

Regarding Lombardi's, 1600 Jackson St. building
My letter is attached and pasted in . San Francisco Planning Commission May 10, 2018 1660 Mission Street San Francisco, CA 94103 Dear Planning Commission: I<U+2019>m writing to you regarding the ever-in-limbo 1600 Jackson Street, formerly Lombardi<U+2019>s. I have listened carefully to arguments and as a resident living paces from Lombardi<U+2019>s, I… My letter is attached and pasted in . San Francisco Planning Commission May 10, 2018 1660 Mission Street San Francisco, CA 94103 Dear Planning Commission: I<U+2019>m writing to you regarding the ever-in-limbo 1600 Jackson Street, formerly Lombardi<U+2019>s. I have listened carefully to arguments and as a resident living paces from Lombardi<U+2019>s, I want Whole Foods 365 to go into that property already zoned for that business. I want WF 365, not because it would serve me, but because, after meeting with my neighbors, I agree it would serve the majority of people who live in this area. I live at 1650 Jackson St. where I have owned my studio condo since 2005 and lived in it since 2012. I cannot believe that the commissioners would even allow the Lombardi<U+2019>s building to be torn down. That action is almost criminal, a waste of a structure that is already zoned and suited for a purpose that the people who live right here want. My burning question to you is<U+2014>pardon my ignorance<U+2014>is not a city commissioner supposed to back its constituents. I<U+2019>m referring to the people who live in a neighborhood like mine and know what it<U+2019>s like day in, day out? We have expressly conveyed our needs with solid reasons so why are we ignored? Can you explain the backroom politics? I was not readily in support of Whole Foods when I first heard the option. But I listened to my neighbors who had done their homework and told me the pros and cons. I wish the commissioners could have been as astute rather than spouting egregious and petty <U+201C>PC<U+201D> blather such as opposing the project because they dislike Amazon. Really, now, is that fair to us? To cut off our noses to spite another<U+2019>s face? I do understand the opposition to Amazon (and the other big tech companies that have altered the face of my city). I<U+2019>ve lived in San Francisco since 1973 when materialism was not so rampant. However, I have survived here because I have negotiated with the reality of the changing world. Perhaps Whole Foods 365 is a compromise, too. But it is not a knee-jerk reaction like that of the commissioners. Another long-time SF resident, a retired History professor, recently said to me, <U+201C>I don<U+2019>t understand city government, I guess it<U+2019>s all bad.<U+201D> Let me ask another question. Where were these commissioners when the nearly half-dozen drug dealers, excuse me, stores<U+2014>Walgreens, CVS, Rite-Aid, moved in all around my neighborhood? Did we really need that many of these pharma giants? I get my holistic medicine from places like Whole Foods 365<U+2014>I<U+2019>m 67 and going strong, so it must be working. WF 365 is comparable to Trader Joe prices, so I can afford their quality goods. Where were you and these commissioners when the Academy of Art (that tax dodger, have they paid up yet?) moved into my neighborhood, taking up at least three, maybe more buildings on Van Ness for show, for museum cars that are useless to us on fixed incomes<U+2014>or even on normal incomes, or to homeless people. And I have received notice, with fuzzy, opaque details, that the Academy is planning to gobble up more real estate near me. Say it ain<U+2019>t so. I am disappointed in Aaron Peskin who lives in North Beach and has the temerity to oppose what we in my neighborhood overwhelmingly want. We need low-income and affordable housing in the city in places that are much less dense than this middle Polk area. What a nightmare it would be for us, first to have that perfectly good structure destroyed, then to add more high-income residents, cars, and traffic jams. I<U+2019>d like a response to my letter. Sincerely, Camille Cusumano CC: SF District Attorney George Gascn City Commissioners <U+2013> by email Jackson Street Homeowners Association (email) Heather Knight, San Francisco Chronicle (email) Jeff Joslin [email removed]> Nora Priego [email removed]> Elizabeth Watty [email removed]> Mark Luella [email removed]> David Lindsay - [email removed]> George Gascon - [email removed]>show more

2018-08-30 · 1 comments · 1 / 0

Stephanie Halverson · email · 2018-08-30 · support · source packet

Whole Foods 365
RE: Case #2016-000378CUA <U+2014> Whole Foods 365 at 1600 Jackson Street Dear Supervisors and Planning Department and Commission members, I<U+2019>m writing in support of the Whole Foods 365 project. I<U+2019>ve lived on Larkin, (btwn. Washington and Jackson), for 13 years. Sadly, during that time I<U+2019>ve witnessed several businesses close and remain empty. I<U+2019>m attaching… show more

2018-09-27 · 9 comments · 6 / 3

Nancy Arbuckle · email · 2018-09-27 · support · source packet

Support WF365 at 1600 Jackson Re: Case #2016-00378CUA SUPPORT
Dear Commissioners, I am 60+ years old and have to walk a long way from my apartment on Hyde Street to get groceries. Lugging a few full bags back is pretty difficult. I would love to see a Whole Foods 365 Market nearby. The neighborhood needs such a store and would greatly benefit from such an establishment at 1600 Jackson Street. What<U+2019>s more, the current eyesore that that block has been for far too lon… show more

Toby Rosenblatt · email · 2018-09-27 · support · source packet

Whole Foods at 1600 Jackson St.
I urge the Commission to approve the current proposal from Whole Foods for a new grocery store. We live at Vallejo & Jones Streets. The neighborhood desperately needs a new larger grocery store with the kind of pricing and variety and quality of product that Whole Foods provides. We have experienced their 365 store when visiting another city, in southern California, and that provides our data for knowing the… show more

Kay Rousseau · email · 2018-09-27 · support · source packet

Whole Foods 365 project
I am writing again to urge you to support this vital project. I live in the Russian Hill neighborhood and everyone I speak with supports the opening of this market. It is good for the neighborhood and it is good for the city. Please do not delay this matter any further. Thank you ! ~Kay Rousseau

Richard Frisbie · email · 2018-09-27 · oppose · source packet

Opposition to Proposed 1600 Jackson Street : Project No. 2016-000378 CUA
Dear President Hillis and Commissioners Find attached Laurel Heights Improvement Association"s opposition to the current "no housing above Whole Foods" plan for 1600 Jackson. Its difficult to comprehend the thought process that developed this "no housing" solution as it is diametrically opposed to the housing needs of the City. We look forward to the Planning Commission rejecting the propose… show more

Chadwick Abbott · email · 2018-09-27 · support · source packet

Case #2016-00378CUA- Whole Foods 365 at 1600 Jackson Street <U+2013> Letter of SUPPORT
Case #2016-00378CUA- Whole Foods 365 at 1600 Jackson Street <U+2013> Letter of SUPPORT Dear Commissioners: I know that the Russian Hill Neighbors have submitted the below letter and as a Russian Hill resident I fully support it. The block and the neighborhood need it. It will be a reason to go to that area which will benefit the existing merchants. Thanks! Chad Abbott Russian Hill resident You have be… Case #2016-00378CUA- Whole Foods 365 at 1600 Jackson Street <U+2013> Letter of SUPPORT Dear Commissioners: I know that the Russian Hill Neighbors have submitted the below letter and as a Russian Hill resident I fully support it. The block and the neighborhood need it. It will be a reason to go to that area which will benefit the existing merchants. Thanks! Chad Abbott Russian Hill resident You have before you a small miracle: A developer who wants to open a new neighborhood-friendly grocery store in San Francisco. An owner who has the financial strength to make it succeed. A project that will not require another teardown and will reuse a familiar but long-vacant early 2dh century structure. A project that will displace no one. A store that the vast majority of residents in the neighborhood have repeatedly said they badly want. Russian Hill Neighbors, which represents over 500 households in the neighborhood of the proposed project, has now submitted multiple letters of support for this project in the course of more than two and a half years since it was originally proposed. As the continued October 4th Conditional Use hearing approaches, we are writing again to confirm our strongest level of support for this project and to respond with additional information. Here are our main reasons for supporting this project: It has overwhelming support from the neighborhood. Based on our own survey and other surveys, there is huge backing for this project. The strongest support comes from the people who Jive the closest to it. Most of the opposition appears to come from people and entities that live far away from it. We need a grocery store here. In the last few years hundreds of new housing units have been built adjacent and near this site while meanwhile several independent general grocery stores on Polk Street have closed. We now have in the blocks around the proposed project a large imbalance in the mix of uses where there is housing, but insufficient full-service grocery stores to serve the people who live there. We need to bring more life to this part of Polk Street. There is a dead zone here, which a well-run grocery will help fix. The mixed-use alternative that some of the opponents advocate has major disadvantages. An almost full-block vacancy would be extended yet another 4-5 years for new planning and construction. This would be intolerable. Given the recent spike in construction and financing costs, this vacancy could extend even longer, as we understand a number of approved projects have recently been put on hold as their financial feasibility is reevaluated. A new building could not provide a grocery, as zoning limits a new retail space to no more than 4,000 square feet. If and when the smaller retail spaces are ultimately rented, the likely types of tenancies, such as gyms or work-space, would be far less successful in creating foot-traffic. Having a store that is part of a larger company could in fact be a positive. It is clear that the independent locally-owned grocery store, however attractive in concept, is an unlikely proposition in a world of modern supply-chain management. No non-chain groceries have been proposed here and most feature much higher prices than WF365 and are less positioned to serve families and seniors in this neighborhood. Since this store is backed by a company with financial strength, it may be able to succeed in what is widely thought to be a brutal retail environment. This project would preserve a familiar 1908 structure that fits well in the neighborhood. This project can be finished in months. Unlike the hypothetical alternative proposed by the organized opposition, it is feasible and reuses a simple but useful and pleasant concrete garage. We don't need to tear down any more of our built history. The three or four local merchants who say the new store will cost them business are probably mistaken. There has been some opposition from a few local merchants who indicate they are worried that their businesses and livelihoods will be harmed. But what we know about urban land use actually tells us the opposite is usually true: in vibrant cities, activity breeds activity. The problems of brick-and-mortar retail have been much discussed, and we have seen that it has been difficult to get a grocery store to open up in San Francisco lately. This is a project that, if approved, has a good chance of succeeding in a difficult environment. Commissioners, after a very long wait, we ask you again in the strongest possible way to please, finally, allow this project to go forward. Thank you. CHAD ABBOTT Levi Strauss & Co. 1155 Battery Street San Francisco, CA 94111 [email removed]; [phone removed] This message is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized to disclose, distribute, copy or use this message or any information contained in this message. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify us immediately by reply e-mail or telephone and please delete this message. Thank you very much for your cooperationshow more

Perry Freeman · email · 2018-09-27 · support · source packet

Whole Foods 365 Store
Dear Commissioners and Planners, I hope you will vote to approve a new Whole Foods 365 store in the space that was formerly Lombardi Sports at 1600 Jackson Street and Polk Street. We need a comprehensive and less expensive grocery store alternative to the existing small, higher mark-up food stores along Polk Street. Each of those has something to offer, but affordability is not often one of them. Thank you for the… show more

Ozzie Rohm · email · 2018-09-27 · oppose · source packet

Opposition to Conditional Use Authorization for 1600 Jackson Street
President Hillis and Members of the Planning Commission, Please see the attached letter from Noe Neighborhood Council in opposition to the proposed project at 1600 Jackson Street. Sincerely, Ozzie Rohm

Gail Baugh · email · 2018-09-27 · oppose · source packet

1600 Jackson, Whole Foods-2016-000378CUA
The Hayes Valley Neighborhood Association does not support the Whole Food retailer to occupy this location without adding housing units above this retail space. HVNA is in the midst of securing a grocery store in the street level retail space at 555 Fulton, and we have embraced added units of housing on the site of an old commercial space. The significance of adding market rate and BMR<U+2019>s onsite, within … The Hayes Valley Neighborhood Association does not support the Whole Food retailer to occupy this location without adding housing units above this retail space. HVNA is in the midst of securing a grocery store in the street level retail space at 555 Fulton, and we have embraced added units of housing on the site of an old commercial space. The significance of adding market rate and BMR<U+2019>s onsite, within a food desert community, is a significant step to address issues of equity and service to the community at large that is undergoing significant changes. 1600 Jackson, in neighborhood experiencing significant changes, must include housing in addition to a grocery store space. After listening to the Whole Foods<U+2019> presentation for a 55,000 SF retail site at 8thStreet and Market, Whole Foods knows the importance of housing to support its retail model. More housing above the 1600 Jackson site is a strategy to sustain its retail grocery business. A grocery store, eliminating this opportunity to add needed housing in the neighborhood, is just another way to clog our streets with traffic, in an area saturated with car transit. HVNA strongly urges adding more housing above this retail space. Sincerely, The Hayes Valley Neighborhood Association does not support the Whole Food retailer to occupy this location without adding housing units above this retail space. HVNA is in the midst of securing a grocery store in the street level retail space at 555 Fulton, and we have embraced added units of housing on the site of an old commercial space. The significance of adding market rate and BMR<U+2019>s onsite, within a food desert community, is a significant step to address issues of equity and service to the community at large that is undergoing significant changes. 1600 Jackson, in neighborhood experiencing significant changes, must include housing in addition to a grocery store space. After listening to the Whole Foods<U+2019> presentation for a 55,000 SF retail site at 8thStreet and Market, Whole Foods knows the importance of housing to support its retail model. More housing above the 1600 Jackson site is a strategy to sustain its retail grocery business. A grocery store, eliminating this opportunity to add needed housing in the neighborhood, is just another way to clog our streets with traffic, in an area saturated with car transit. HVNA strongly urges adding more housing above this retail space. Sincerely, Gail Baugh President, Hayes Valley Neighborhood Assn [email removed] [phone removed] (text ok)show more

Carol Ann Rogers · email · 2018-09-27 · support · source packet

Additional Russian Hill Neighbors Letter of Support for Whole Foods 365 at 1600 Jackson Street
Good morning Mr. Ionin, Attached please find a PDF formatted copy of an additional letter of support for the Whole Foods 365 Conditional Use (Case #2016-00378CUA). This is a new letter (RHN has already submitted several) and we would appreciate its distribution to the Commissioners in preparation for the October 4th continued hearing on this matter. Please call or email me with any questions. With appreciation, Caro… show more

2018-10-04 · 37 comments · 13 / 24

Ray Bair · spoken · 2018-10-04 · oppose

Opposed

Michael Priolo · spoken · 2018-10-04 · oppose

Opposition

Kevin Gleason · spoken · 2018-10-04 · oppose

Working and living in the area

Kathy Wizowski · spoken · 2018-10-04 · oppose

Opposition

Leslie Van Dyke · spoken · 2018-10-04 · oppose

Housing

Mitchel Berg · spoken · 2018-10-04 · oppose

Opposition

Joseph Omran · spoken · 2018-10-04 · oppose

Opposed

Sarah Taber · spoken · 2018-10-04 · support

Grocery store needed

Tim McLaughlin · spoken · 2018-10-04 · oppose

Opposition

Stephanie Chang · spoken · 2018-10-04 · oppose

Unnecessary

Drakari Donaldson · spoken · 2018-10-04 · oppose

Opposed, housing

Paul Webber · spoken · 2018-10-04 · oppose

Opposition

Dick Wayman · spoken · 2018-10-04 · support

Support

Tiffany Yang · spoken · 2018-10-04 · support

Support

Dick Mortenson · spoken · 2018-10-04 · oppose

Opposed

Chris Schulman · spoken · 2018-10-04 · oppose

Housing

Louise Mercier · spoken · 2018-10-04 · oppose

Issues and concerns

Robert Bluhm · email · 2018-10-04 · support · source packet

1600 Jackson St Whole Foods proposal Re: 2016-000378CUA
Dear Planning Commissioners, I<U+2019>m writing to reiterate my strongest support for the WF365 application. I live on Russian Hill about 6-7 blocks northeast of the proposed grocery. This is well within walking distance for me. My current options usually require a drive for me, either north to the Safeway and TJs at the Northpoint Center, or south to the Whole Foods on Franklin or TJ<U+2019>s on Californ… show more

Lynne Newhouse Segal · email · 2018-10-04 · oppose · source packet

1600 Jackson Opposition
Pacific Heights Residents Association (PHRA) joins Mid Polk Neighborhood Association and Polk District Merchants Association in opposition to Conditional Use Authorization for formula retail use by Amazon/Whole Foods Market 365. PHRA supports more housing at this address. Thank you for your consideration. Lynne Newhouse Segal VP, PHRA

Peter Maggs · email · 2018-10-04 · oppose · source packet

Letter Opposing 1600 Jackson St CU
Dear Planning Commissioners, Please see the attached letter written by the Middle Polk Neighborhood Association (MPNA), Polk District Merchants Association (PDMA), and United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW Local 648) regarding 1600 Jackson Street. I think it clearly outlines the opposition against the Conditional Use application and I would like to voice my opposition as a resident of Russian Hill. Please DO… show more

Barbara Conwell · email · 2018-10-04 · support · source packet

Letter of support Whole Foods 360
I am writing a letter in support of the WF 360 slated for the of Lombardi Sports building on Polk St. I hope it passes soon! We need more grocery stores in the neighborhood. Sincerely, Barbara Conwell 1230 Clay ST APT 101 SF Sent from my iPhone

Kate Chase · email · 2018-10-04 · oppose · source packet

Letter of opposition - Amazon Whole Foods 365 at 1600 Jackson St
Dear Commissioners, I am writing to you today to reiterate my opposition to having a Amazon/WholeFoods 365 store at 1600 Jackson Street. As someone who has lived and shopped on lower Polk for going on 25-years, I continue to believe that using this location for mixed use with small retail and housing will be of far greater benefit to the neighborhood vs. allowing the giant that is Amazon to come in and change the who… show more

Judi Basolo · email · 2018-10-04 · support · source packet

PLEASE APPROVE 365 MARKET ON POLK STREET!
I live in the neighborhood at Jones and Clay and I also work in the neighborhood at California and Van Ness and we really need a real amazing supermarket in our area like 365 can offer us. Been hoping this project would culminate for years now. The last time you vetoed this project so many people who don<U+2019>t reside in our neighborhood showed up at the commission meeting and I<U+2019>m concerned t… show more

Jim Warshell · spoken · 2018-10-04 · support

Support

Jj Hanley · email · 2018-10-04 · oppose · source packet

Please vote NO on 1600 Jackson Street Conditional Use
Hi, I'm writing in opposition to the proposed Whole Foods/Amazon at the old Lombardi's located at 1600 Jackson St. The city is managing a housing crisis not a grocery crisis. As an SF resident for 12 years I urge you to Vote NO on the Conditional Use Application. Thank you, -JJ

Yvette Cuca · email · 2018-10-04 · support · source packet

1600 Jackson Street Whole Foods project
Dear Planning Commission, I am writing in favor of the proposed Whole Foods 365 project at 1600 Jackson Street, at the corner of Polk. I am in favor of the proposal for a number of reasons. First, this building has been empty for a number of years already. Although there have been several proposals for the space, none have been found to be acceptable to everyone in the neighborhood. Instead, we now have a huge em… Dear Planning Commission, I am writing in favor of the proposed Whole Foods 365 project at 1600 Jackson Street, at the corner of Polk. I am in favor of the proposal for a number of reasons. First, this building has been empty for a number of years already. Although there have been several proposals for the space, none have been found to be acceptable to everyone in the neighborhood. Instead, we now have a huge empty space that is dragging down the entire area around it. Second, housing is obviously an important consideration for the city, but there have been more than a few new, large apartment buildings that have been built in the surrounding area in the past couple of years. The existing housing needs supporting services, including grocery stores. Third, I believe the rationales for not building on top of the existing building, and not tearing down the building to create something new are reasonable. No one in the neighborhood wants more years of construction on Polk Street right after the entire block has undergone extensive and disruptive renovation (and not with all the current construction on Van Ness). In addition, this site is on the top of the hill, and I don't think we should build a tall apartment building on the top of a hill, where it will tower over everything around it. Third, the other food stores nearby are generally specialty stores (The Cheese Shop, The Jug Shop). Even Real Foods is relatively specialized in comparison to what the Whole Foods 365 stores will sell. I completely understand the concern from the owners of these businesses, but I believe that even though a Whole Foods may initially take business from some of the smaller stores, it will ultimately raise the entire neighborhood, and bring in more people and more shoppers for everyone. For my family, having the Whole Foods will mean not driving my car to Safeway. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Yvette Cuca [email removed] 1425 Vallejo Street (between Polk and Larkin)show more

Drakari Donaldson · email · 2018-10-04 · oppose · source packet

Opposing 1600 Jackson St CU
Dear Planning Commissioners, Please see the attached letter written by the Middle Polk Neighborhood Association (MPNA), Polk District Merchants Association (PDMA), and United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW Local 648) regarding 1600 Jackson Street. I think it clearly outlines the opposition against the Conditional Use application and I would like to voice my opposition as a resident of Russian Hill. Please DO… show more

Richard Cardello · email · 2018-10-04 · support · source packet

Case No. 2016-000378CUA HEARING DATE 10-04-2018 WHOLE FOODS 365, 1600 JACKSON
AT POLK, CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION October 1, 2018 San Francisco Planning Commission 1650 Mission Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, California 94103 [email removed] RE: Case No. 2016-000378CUA HEARING DATE 10-04-2018 WHOLE FOODS 365, 1600 JACKSON AT POLK, CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION Commissioners: I am in support of the above captioned Conditional Use Application. I have long been impressed by the Planning… AT POLK, CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION October 1, 2018 San Francisco Planning Commission 1650 Mission Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, California 94103 [email removed] RE: Case No. 2016-000378CUA HEARING DATE 10-04-2018 WHOLE FOODS 365, 1600 JACKSON AT POLK, CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION Commissioners: I am in support of the above captioned Conditional Use Application. I have long been impressed by the Planning Commission<U+2019>s commitment to serving the citizens of San Francisco, which is why I am appealing to you to consider their needs and wishes regarding the proposed Whole Foods 365 hoping to occupy the existing vacant former Lombardi Sports building at Jackson and Polk Streets. My friends and neighbors overwhelmingly want this neighborhood-serving market. It seems that most of the opposition is from outside of the area that would be served by this store. In addition to comparing the numbers of supporters versus the number of opponents, I urge you to consider the implications of the decision you will make: I believe in CHOICE <U+2013> if you approve this project, customers will have the choice to either patronize this store or not. If you deny the CU, then the public is denied that choice. Approving the CU puts the responsibility on WF365 to be truly NEIGHBORING SERVING if it is to be successful. I believe Whole Foods has demonstrated that they are fully committed to doing so. If they fail in that, they will close. I have attended several Planning Commission hearings and have watched very many of SFTV. The dedication of you Commissioners to serving the people of San Francisco is clear. You tirelessly struggle with housing issues, competing interests, codes, etc. I am sure you were not fooled by the disingenuous proposal by the opposition to <U+201C>build a new building with a market below and housing above<U+201D> since recent legislation would make that impossible. Prior proposed legislation to ban formula retail at this location met with tremendous protest by impacted neighbors and has been tabled. I believe we have this unique opportunity to provide a much wanted market at this location and the Planning Commission would best serve the public by approving the original CU Application. My understanding is that WF365 and the building<U+2019>s owner clearly heard the Planning Commission<U+2019>s desire for a housing component on the site. If WF365 and the property owner are able to accommodate some housing using the existing building, even at the expense of the optimum potential of the market, I believe the Planning Commission will be compelled to approve this CU application WITHOUT THE NEED FOR FURTHER PROCESS. Very truly yours, RICHARD CARDELLO CCS: John Rahaim Director of Planning [email removed] District 3 Supervisor Aaron Peskin [email removed] SF Planner assigned to this project [email removed] RICH HILLIS Commission President [email removed] MYRNA MELGAR Commission Vice-President [email removed] RODNEY FONG Commissioner [phone removed] [email removed] MILICENT A. JOHNSON Commissioner [email removed] JOEL KOPPEL Commissioner [email removed] KATHRIN MOORE Commissioner [email removed] DENNIS RICHARDS Commissioner [email removed] Rob Twyman [email removed] RHN DZLU [email removed] RICHARD CARDELLO 999 GREEN STREET NO. 903 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94133 T [phone removed] [email removed]show more

Jim Reuben · spoken · 2018-10-04 · support

Project presentation

Rob Issacson · spoken · 2018-10-04 · support

Project presentation

John Addeo · spoken · 2018-10-04 · support

Support

Pamela Desvernine · spoken · 2018-10-04 · oppose

Opposed

Jo-Ann Mcdevitt · email · 2018-10-04 · oppose · source packet

Polk Street Project Lombardi Sports Building
I am writing to voice my huge concern on the Polk Street project in the = space formerly Lombardi Sports. It will be a detriment to the neighborhood and small business to have = the entire building for Amazon. I very much oppose this and hope you will consider the idea proposed of = Amazon having just the bottom floor and the rest of the building for = affordable housing. Thank you for your consideration. Jo-Ann McDevitt 1770 Broadway=20 San Francisco=

Richard Cardello · spoken · 2018-10-04 · oppose

no text recorded

Leslie Bull · spoken · 2018-10-04 · support

no text recorded

Anastasia Yovanopoulos · spoken · 2018-10-04 · oppose

no text recorded

Gavin Jefferies · spoken · 2018-10-04 · oppose

no text recorded

2018-10-11 · 3 comments · 0 / 3

Suzanne Markel-Fox · email · 2018-10-11 · oppose · source packet

2013-000378CUA
President Hillis and Commissioners, Please see the attached letter in opposition to the proposed conditional use of 1600-1616 Jackson Street. I am grateful for the opportunity to express my concerns, and I thank you. Kind regards, Suzanne Markel-Fox

Chris Gembinski · email · 2018-10-11 · oppose · source packet

RE: 1600 Jackson Street CU
If the sponsor is planning to continue to pursue this application as opposed to withdrawing, we wanted to just confirm what we heard from the commissioners at last night<U+2019>s hearing. As we understand it the Commission would like the sponsor to submit plans and the department to analyze for code and environmental compliance that do the following prior to coming back to the next hearing: (1) 50 percent of t… show more

Gary Gach · email · 2018-10-11 · oppose · source packet

Former LOMBARDI's on Polk
Dear Honorable Planners, Commissioners, and Supervisors: I hope this finds you well in this present moment. I'd intended to attend last night's hearing but unavoidable circumstances got in the way. I hope my testimony herein is acceptable. I have been a citizen in San Francisco for the majority of my life, and am a tax-paying property owner here. I wish to express my concern about the former site operated… show more

2018-11-08 · 74 comments · 31 / 42

Frank Burkatzky · email · 2018-11-08 · support · source packet

1600 Jackson Street, Case No. 2016-000378CUAVAR
October 6, 2018 FROM: Karen and David Dold 1650 Jackson Street Units 503 and 504 San Francisco, CA 94109 Case No. 2016-000378CUAVAR 1600 Jackson Street Dear Planning Commissioners: We are owners of two units at 1650 Jackson Street, directly adjacent to the property at 1600 Jackson Street. We have lived at this address since 1991 and are directly adjacent to 1600 Jackson Street. We would like to add our s… October 6, 2018 FROM: Karen and David Dold 1650 Jackson Street Units 503 and 504 San Francisco, CA 94109 Case No. 2016-000378CUAVAR 1600 Jackson Street Dear Planning Commissioners: We are owners of two units at 1650 Jackson Street, directly adjacent to the property at 1600 Jackson Street. We have lived at this address since 1991 and are directly adjacent to 1600 Jackson Street. We would like to add our support to the mixed use project being proposed at 1600 Jackson Street for a Whole Foods 365 store and residential rental units. We believe that this compromise with our neighborhood is a good one and we applaud both Whole Foods and Village Properties for sticking with our neighborhood and supporting our desires as well as the desires of the Planning Commission. The property in question has been vacant for about three years. This is a viable building suitable for this project without much alteration and this is the most sustainable option for this property. During the last few years, our neighborhood has come together, along with the Russian Hill Neighborhood Association, (and despite the Middle Polk Neighborhood Association which has not listened to the desires of the neighborhood, has not taken a vote, and has not performed due diligence by neighborhood outreach to verify their view like The Russian Hill Association has) to work with Whole Foods and the developer to have our needs met. We believe that both the Whole Foods 365 team and the developer have continued to meet our demands and have been open to discussions and meetings. We have all put in a great deal of time and energy on this project and feel that we should be listened to. We thoroughly object to the many non-residents who have voiced their opinions against this project - including some of our local merchants and the Merchant Association. It is our feeling that the opinions of those who live here should be given weight as to what our neighborhood needs. We support our merchants and they should in turn support us. We would hope that the Planning Commissions would put aside their own prejudices which were very obvious two hearings ago and look at all of the correspondence written in favor these last couple of years of this project. We would also like to remind the Commission that this neighborhood did not vote for a ban on formula retail and that a Whole Foods 365 would be welcomed here. During the last few years, our neighborhood density has increased overwhelmingly. There are many other large scale projects which will be coming up in the next few years. One is already being proposed across the street from us at 1641 Jackson which is now on the market for sale. We have had large multi-unit residential projects built recently on Pacific and Washington Streets in this neighborhood. We will definitely need a full-service, walkable grocery store in which to shop which is not a small, expensive specialty store such as The Cheese Shop, Bel Campo Meats, or The Jug Shop. These are not full- service stores where one could shop every day. Right now, there are numerous vacant retail spots on Polk St. between Broadway and California St. We believe having a Whole Foods 365 store on Polk would boost business for everyone.The addition of an anchor store such as Whole Foods 365 would be a welcome addition to our neighborhood and would most assuredly boost foot traffic on Polk Street to help Polk get back on track. Formula retail has certainly not adversely affected Chestnut Street which is a lively, viable street. Polk Street certainly deserves more than another coffee retail spot, nail salon, gym or massage establishment. We can guarantee that this would be a successful spot in the neighborhood. In closing, I would like to remind you that one of the commissioners complained about not liking the Whole Foods any longer on California Street because the lines were too long and it was not as friendly. We believe the lines are too long and the store crowded because the neighborhood has grown and that we need another full-service store. Please vote to approve this project. The life and health of our neighborhood depends on it. Sincerely, Karen and David Dold 1650 Street Units 503 and 504 San Fracisco, CA 94109 Reply Reply All Forwardshow more

Joshua S. Devore · email · 2018-11-08 · oppose · source packet

RE: 1600 Jackson Street
Dear Commissioners, Mr. Ionin and Mr. Foster: Further to our prior comments of April 18 and 25, please find attached further correspondence on behalf of our clients, Tony Vargas and the Polk District Merchants Association, in opposition to the 1600 Jackson Street project. We apologize for the last-minute nature of the submission, and appreciate your consideration of our submissions. Respectfully, Joshua S. Devor… show more

Richard Cardello · email · 2018-11-08 · support · source packet

WHOLE FOODS 365, 1600 JACKSON ST, Case No. 2016-000378CUA PLANNING COMMISSION
HEARING DATE 11-08-2018 -- OUTSIDE OPPOSITION Commissioners: I am writing to you with a particular personal concern about the above captioned case before you. The proposed Whole Foods 365 at 1600 Jackson Street is much wanted by the residents in my neighborhood. As you know, this project has been in the permit process for several years, and I strongly ask that it be approved. My reason for this email is to … show more

Judith P. Roddy · email · 2018-11-08 · support · source packet

Re: 1600 Jackson Street 2016-000378CUA
Good morning, On the eve of yet another hearing for the proposed Whole Foods Market 365 at 1600 Jackson Street, I am left wondering what else I can do to show my support for the project. Does this email matter? I do not know. Will my having spoken at prior hearings matter? I do not know. Did the fact that I had to work and could not attend the October hearing matter? I do not know. Will my being at the hearing to… Good morning, On the eve of yet another hearing for the proposed Whole Foods Market 365 at 1600 Jackson Street, I am left wondering what else I can do to show my support for the project. Does this email matter? I do not know. Will my having spoken at prior hearings matter? I do not know. Did the fact that I had to work and could not attend the October hearing matter? I do not know. Will my being at the hearing tomorrow matter? I do not know. And yet, in light of how I feel about how our country is faring right now, to sit back and do nothing does not seem like the right thing to do. Below is my email dated October 2 that I would ask you to skim. I will not bore you with my two or three preceding emails. So, at the risk of taking your time unnecessarily, all I can do is repeat: I love my neighborhood. My neighborhood has problems: Empty storefronts, lack of vitality, lack of anchor destinations to attract foot traffic. My neighborhood is dense, and its density requires services. We do not have a full-service grocery store in our neighborhood. We have smaller shops that are great for special occasions but that I find unaffordable for routine shopping. I wish the local merchants so in opposition of Whole Foods Market 365 had embraced Whole Foods Market 365 as an opportunity rather than as a threat. I wish the Planning Commission would continue to listen to those of us who actually live in the neighborhood. The MPNA does not speak for me. I admire Whole Foods Market 365 and Village Properties for continuing to believe in the viability of their vision that was first presented to the neighborhood in 2015. I thank you for your time. I do not know what else I can say, except I hope you think of what is best for OUR neighborhood and that you think of us who live in and love our neighborhood and approve the Whole Foods Market 365 at 1600 Jackson Street as it is presented tomorrow. Thank you. Judi Judith Roddy 1591 Jackson Street No. 11 San Francisco, CA 94109 On Tue, Oct 2, 2018 at 9:16 AM Judith P. Roddy [email removed]> wrote: October 2, 2018 Supervisor Peskin, Commissioners and Mr. Rahaim, My name is Judith Roddy, I am 64 years old and I have owned a condominium at 1591 Jackson Street at the corner of Jackson Street and Polk Street since 2000. Repeating what I wrote you in April, 2018, if (and that<U+2019>s a big if) I can afford to, I hope to retire and live the rest of my life at 1591 Jackson Street. Here are three things that struck me at the April 26, 2018 hearing: My neighbors and I are passionate about our neighborhood; Many people and organizations from outside our neighborhood who had probably never visited our neighborhood showed up and spoke in opposition of Whole Foods Market 365; There was an emotional, frustrated outburst when Whole Foods Market 365 was not given the green light: Frustrated because those of us who live in the neighborhood are merely trying to work with you to get what we feel our neighborhood needs and we felt our needs were not being understood. Or, maybe the Commission DID understand. Quoting (more or less, as I recall) Commission President Rich Hillis: <U+201C>If I walked around the neighborhood and asked 100 neighbors if they wanted the Whole Foods Market 365 at the corner of Polk and Jackson Streets, 99 of them would say YES.<U+201D> As the April 26 hearing started to wind up, members of the Whole Foods Market 365 and Village Properties teams were asked by the Commission to incorporate housing in their project. Did my neighbors and I think Whole Foods and Village Properties would put one more penny or one more minute into their project? Absolutely not! Kudos to Whole Foods and Village Properties for NOT abandoning our neighborhood, for coming up with a plan that meets the Commission<U+2019>s request for housing and for maintaining a plan to bring a badly-needed, full-service grocery store to our neighborhood. Please vote to approve Whole Foods<U+2019> and Village Properties<U+2019> proposal for their viable mixed-use alternative for the site. The life and health of our neighborhood depends on it. More months have passed and the former Lombardi Sports building is still vacant. Polk Street is still lined with vacant storefronts. Does the neighborhood need more small shops and boutique convenience stores? In my opinion, no. As I write this, I have heard of at least two mixed-use projects in the pipeline in the immediate vicinity that will unlikely result in housing above small commercial parcels on the ground floors. Does the City need more housing? Probably, although I am concerned that no matter how much housing is built, the evidence I see every day in the neighborhood in which I work (SOMA <U+2013> Mission Street between 7th Street and 8th Street) supports San Francisco is suffering from a medical crisis <U+2013> not merely a housing crisis. I am becoming involved with the newly-formed Discover Polk Community Benefit District and recently attended a meeting where a neighborhood business owner said, <U+201C>What our neighborhood needs is more foot traffic.<U+201D> Indeed, our neighborhood needs open, vibrant and well-kept storefronts that provide goods and services to its neighbors and that attract people. The addition of Whole Foods Market 365 is a welcome addition to our neighborhood and would most assuredly boost foot traffic on Polk Street to help Polk Street get back on track. Neighborhoods are not neighborhoods without businesses to support its residents. When I got to the head of the line at Trader Joe<U+2019>s (at California Street and Hyde Street) last night at 6:20 PM, the young lady behind the counter, perhaps having dealt with a lot of cranky customers, smiled sheepishly and asked me how long I was in line. Having timed my experience just for the fun of it and because I found in incredible that the line was so very long, I confidently replied, <U+201C>14 minutes and 27 seconds.<U+201D> On countless occasions I have experienced similar long lines at Whole Foods at California Street and Franklin Street. I believe these long lines demonstrate a need for the Whole Foods Market 365 in my neighborhood that will not only attract foot traffic to our neighborhood but will also serve my neighbors and my Russian Hill neighbors. I understand why neighborhood businesses such as Cheese Plus, The Jug Shop and Belcampo Meat Co. are concerned about Whole Foods Market 365 taking away their business. I understand their fear as more and more of us are buying items online. Foot traffic will help them! (Personal story: I am ADDICTED to the Brown Butter Cookie Company<U+2019>s Brown Butter Sea Salt cookies. 12 cookies on its website: $13. 12 cookies at Cheese Plus: $14. What did I do Sunday afternoon? I marched to Cheese Plus and bought a box for $14. What is the likelihood of Whole Foods Market 365 having these cookies on its shelves: None. (Please do not ask me how many cookies I ate!) I have written the following to you before: It is my understanding the Middle Polk Neighborhood Association (an organization that says it represents our neighborhood which confuses me because I am a member and I have never been asked my opinion about Whole Foods Market 365) would prefer housing with small, ground floor retail units. I do not understand this because of the many vacant commercial spaces on Polk Street and surrounding streets. Why demolish a perfectly good building to add housing and small retail when Whole Foods is ready to step in, pretty much guarantee an ongoing business for many, many years and solve a neighborhood need? Although I understand the need for housing in San Francisco, 1600 Polk Street is an existing building that has been in place for decades, is not displacing residential units or well-established local businesses and, architecturally, is appropriately scaled for the neighborhood and Polk Street. I find it illogical to add to the neighborhood<U+2019>s population density by adding housing when the population<U+2019>s basic service needs are not already met. Having attended both prior hearings, I am disappointed I cannot be at Thursday<U+2019>s hearing because I must be at work; however, I will be with you in spirit and in support of Whole Foods Market 365 and Village Properties. Thank you for your time and for all you do for San Francisco. Judith Roddy 1591 Jackson Street, No. 11 San Francisco, CA 94109 [phone removed] By email to: Supervisor Aaron Peskin (by email to [email removed]) John Rahaim, Director of Planning (by email to [email removed]) Rich Hillis, President, Planning Commission (by email to [email removed]) Myrna Melgar, Vice President, Planning Commission (by email to [email removed]) Rodney Fong, Commissioner (by email to [email removed]) Milicent A. Johnson, Commissioner (by email to [email removed]) Joel Koppel, Commissioner (by email to [email removed]) Kathrin Moore, Commissioner (by email to [email removed]) Dennis Richards, Commissioner (by email to [email removed]) [email removed]show more

Paula Bruin · email · 2018-11-08 · support · source packet

Whole Foods hearing--November 8th
To all the commissioners: I fully support the use of the former Lombardi<U+2019>s building for a full-service grocery (Whole Foods Market). I believe the Polk Street corridor has too many empty buildings and is presently in a very shabby condition. I am a resident/owner at 1650 Jackson St. Paula Bruin [email removed] [email removed] planningrodneyfong.com [email removed] [email removed] [email removed… show more

Amy Sherman · email · 2018-11-08 · support · source packet

Support for the conditional use application of Amazon/Whole Foods at 1600 Jackson
Commissions secretary: I live on Russian Hill at Larkin and Green. Since the closing of Big Apple grocery store I have relied more heavily on delivery services because there is NO full service grocery store that I can walk to and carry my groceries home from. Big Apple was just 2 block away from the proposed Whole Foods 365. Our neighborhood is densely populated and needs a real grocery store. The other stores in… show more

Richard Cardello · email · 2018-11-08 · support · source packet

RHN / WHOLE FOODS 365, 1600 JACKSON ST, Case No. 2016-000378CUA PLANNING
COMMISSION HEARING DATE 11-08-2018 October 26, 2018 San Francisco Planning Commission 1650 Mission Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, California 94103 [email removed] RE: Case No. 2016-000378CUA PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING DATE 11-08-2018 WHOLE FOODS 365, 1600 JACKSON AT POLK, CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION Commissioners: I support the above captioned CU application. Here is a quote from the SF-Planning websit… COMMISSION HEARING DATE 11-08-2018 October 26, 2018 San Francisco Planning Commission 1650 Mission Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, California 94103 [email removed] RE: Case No. 2016-000378CUA PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING DATE 11-08-2018 WHOLE FOODS 365, 1600 JACKSON AT POLK, CONDITIONAL USE APPLICATION Commissioners: I support the above captioned CU application. Here is a quote from the SF-Planning website -- http://sf-planning.org/our-mission <U+201C>OUR VISION: Making San Francisco the world<U+2019>s most livable urban place <U+2013> environmentally, economically, socially and culturally.<U+201D> The Planning Department and Planning Commission work tirelessly for the benefit of the residents of San Francisco. Please listen to the actual people who will be impacted by your decision regarding Whole Foods 365 at 1600 Jackson Street. Advance your vision of <U+201C>making San Francisco the world<U+2019>s most livable urban place<U+201D> by approving the revised project. My friends and neighbors overwhelmingly want this neighborhood-serving market. It seems that most of the opposition is from outside of the area that would be served by this store. I am sure you were not fooled by the disingenuous proposal by the opposition to <U+201C>build a new building with a market below and housing above<U+201D> since recent legislation would make that impossible. I believe we have this unique opportunity to provide a much-wanted market at this location. At the last Planning Commission hearing on October 4, 2018, the Commission asked the project sponsors to add additional housing on the second floor of the existing building. Overcoming many complicating issues, such as window exposure, etc., the CU applicants are now proposing eight dwelling units: one studio, three one- bedroom and four two-bedroom, ranging in size from 783 to 1,274 square feet. Surely, the Planning Commission MUST approve this revised project, which clearly complies with the Commission<U+2019>s directive. Very truly yours, RICHARD CARDELLO CCS: John Rahaim Director of Planning [email removed] District 3 Supervisor Aaron Peskin [email removed] SF Planner assigned to this project [email removed] RICH HILLIS, Commission President [email removed] MYRNA MELGAR, Commission Vice-President [email removed] RODNEY FONG, Commissioner [phone removed] [email removed] MILICENT A. JOHNSON, Commissioner [email removed] JOEL KOPPEL, Commissioner [email removed] KATHRIN MOORE, Commissioner [email removed] DENNIS RICHARDS, Commissioner [email removed] RUSSIAN HILL NEIGHBORS [email removed] Rob Twyman [email removed] Commissions Secretary [email removed] Richard Cardello 999 GREEN STREET NO. 903 SAN FRANCISCO CA 94133 T [phone removed] [email removed]show more

Kate Chase · email · 2018-11-08 · oppose · source packet

Letter of opposition - Amazon Whole Foods 365 at 1600 Jackson St
Dear Commissioners, I am writing to you once again to reiterate my opposition to having a big-box, corporate Amazon/WholeFoods 365 store at 1600 Jackson Street. As someone who believes in the power of community, I was shocked to see their latest round of floor plans <U+2014> no service, no staff, mostly just kiosks for prepared foods and then a paltry 8 units of housing instead of a robust and inclusive … show more

Michael Scheu · email · 2018-11-08 · support · source packet

in support of the WF project at 1600 Jackson Street
To whom it may concern, I am writing in support of the pending Whole Foods 365 project at 1600 Jackson Street. This store will fill a void in the neighborhood and actually draw more foot traffic to the area, potentially boosting the revenues of local merchants. I have attended presentations by Whole Foods, held at the proposed site last year, and was impressed with their vision and willingness to work with an… show more

Alexis Coddington · email · 2018-11-08 · support · source packet

I support the Whole Foods 365
The neighborhood needs a store where we can walk to and park when needed. Please do your job and vote yes to allow Whole Foods 365 to proceed. Alexis Coddington 1101 Green Street SF, CA 94109

Vasu Narayanan · email · 2018-11-08 · oppose · source packet

Letter of Opposition - 1600 Jackson St., - Amazon 365
Dear Commissioners and Supervisor Peskin My name is Vasu Narayanan and I recently acquired Real Foods on Polk. I have owned and operated grocery stores in many parts of the Bay Area, over the past 20 years and have personally experienced the damaging effect of Whole Foods opening in the vicinity of my businesses. I am against the Whole Foods 365 project proposed for 1600 Jackson St. I hope the planning commission w… Dear Commissioners and Supervisor Peskin My name is Vasu Narayanan and I recently acquired Real Foods on Polk. I have owned and operated grocery stores in many parts of the Bay Area, over the past 20 years and have personally experienced the damaging effect of Whole Foods opening in the vicinity of my businesses. I am against the Whole Foods 365 project proposed for 1600 Jackson St. I hope the planning commission will take a leadership role in being a champion for housing and protecting small businesses and communities and allow larger companies to operate only in appropriate surroundings. Some key points 1) Empty building <U+2013> no dislocation of tenants <U+2013> sufficient housing with bonus for 30% affordable housing and still can accommodate retail 2) Existing retailers in the neighborhood can continue to invest and grow and thrive and NOT become Zombie businesses causing many to lose employment (if you allow Whole Foods 365 to open here) 3) This location alone will have enough selling square footage to match all the 16 retail spaces on both sides of Polk St. between Vallejo and Broadway (except Walgreens), meaning Whole Foods would be effectively given enough space to cover a full two sided block to overpower and destroy small businesses in the vicinity. 4) The major supporters come from Russian Hill farther away from the location than people close by <U+2013> except tenants from next door who fear losing views and wrongly think low income housing is what will come there thus affecting their real estate values. 5) There are plenty of grocery options here <U+2013> only a few blocks away and also lots of delivery options. This neighborhood has not suffered from lack of grocery options. 6) Most small businesses are owner operated and single employee - hence most people are unable to attend the hearing in person. So the true opponents are substantially more than the supporters lobbied by Whole Foods. 7) At least 50 nearby businesses will be detrimentally impacted <U+2013> we have already seen this at other locations where Whole Foods has opened with the city. 8) An opportunity to expand housing here will be forgone for ever if the current application goes through. 9) Developer has not responded to multiple overtures by merchants and locals who suggested a Special Utility District option and/or full size retail below new housing development. 10) Proposing 8 market rate units vs. possible 80+ units is an insult <U+2013> Also, the developer<U+2019>s statement that housing is not viable is categorically wrong, given analyses by other developers. 11) So many local manufacturers and wholesalers have been hurt by Amazon discontinuing businesses with local players and centralizing buying nationwide. This trend will only get worse as they consolidate their ever expanding line of Amazon Go, Amazon star, Whole Foods and Whole Foods 365 and choke smaller businesses. Please don<U+2019>t squander this opportunity to do the right thing. Expand housing, preserve the neighborhood character, let small business grow and thrive and everyone will be better off <U+2013> including the developer. Respectfully Vasudev Narayananshow more

Robert Bluhm · email · 2018-11-08 · support · source packet

1600 Jackson St Whole Foods proposal
Re: 2016-000378CUA Dear Planning Commissioners, I<U+2019>m writing once again to relay my strongest support for the WF365 application, especially in light of the recent changes to the proposal. The provision of 8 housing units, in particular with inclusion of two-bedroom units, seems to me very positive and shows a serious, good faith effort to respond to the Commission<U+2019>s direction over the past se… show more

Chris Gembinski · email · 2018-11-08 · oppose · source packet

Letter from MPNA, PDMA, UFCW - RE: 1600 Jackson St CU
Dear Planning Commission, Please see the attached letter from the Middle Polk Neighborhood Association (MPNA), Polk District Merchants Association (PDMA), and the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW Local 648) regarding the 1600 Jackson Street CU. I would like this letter as well as another letter (attached) from the Chinatown Community Development Center to be included in the record for the November 8th me… show more

Gloria Allen · email · 2018-11-08 · support · source packet

Please approve 1600 Jackson at Hearing Thursday, November 8th
Dear Commissioners, As a resident of 1650 Jackson Street, I SUPPORT the Whole Foods 365 for the former Lombardi space at 1600 Jackson and ask you to approve this much needed addition to our neighborhood. Thank you, Gloria Allen Owner/ Resident Apartment 605 since 2001 Sent from my iPad

Cynthia G<U+00F3>mez · email · 2018-11-08 · oppose · source packet

Letter of opposition to Whole Foods project at 1600 Jackson
Dear Mr. Foster, This letter is to reiterate our opposition to the proposed Whole Foods 365 Market at 1600 Jackson Street. Our union represents approximately 350 members who live in the vicinity of the proposed development. We concur with the Middle Polk Neighborhood Association, the Polk District Merchants Association, and the United Food and Commercial Workers that pedestrian-oriented development of housing over … Dear Mr. Foster, This letter is to reiterate our opposition to the proposed Whole Foods 365 Market at 1600 Jackson Street. Our union represents approximately 350 members who live in the vicinity of the proposed development. We concur with the Middle Polk Neighborhood Association, the Polk District Merchants Association, and the United Food and Commercial Workers that pedestrian-oriented development of housing over retail would be the best use for this site. San Francisco<U+2019>s housing affordability crisis has resulted in a process by which the overage median income of the city is trending ever upward, leaving middle- and working-class residents pushed ever farther away from the city. As of 2012, more than 60% of our residents lived in San Francisco. That number dropped by more than 11 percentage points in a five-year period; now only 49% of our members live in the city. More housing production, in an area easily walkable to the hotels of Union Square and the hotels and membership clubs of Nob Hill, would certainly do its part to easing the housing affordability crisis. This project, as proposed by Amazon<U+2019>s Whole Foods 365, would deliver only 8 units of housing, while neighbors have argued that the space can support as many as 50 units. One of the greatest tools available to the Planning staff, and to Planning Commissioners, is the Conditional Use Authorization process. A project must affirmatively prove that it is necessary and desirable for the neighborhood which it is proposing to serve. The proposed Whole Foods 365 Market project fails on several counts. It is opposed by the neighbors for its inherent overreliance on car traffic and for a missed opportunity to bring much-needed housing to the neighborhood. The project would also be bringing in low-quality jobs by its very design. Whole Foods is well-known for its outright opposition to workers<U+2019> rights to collective bargaining. Its ownership is Amazon, a company which has drawn widespread criticism for the wages and conditions offered to its employees. It would be a mistake to grant an actively anti-union company a Conditional Use Authorization to come to San Francisco, a town with one of the highest costs of living in the country and a town with strongly pro-union politics. We ask that Planning Commissioners reject this project at the Planning Commission, on the grounds that it is neither necessary nor desirable for the neighborhood. Sincerely, -- Cynthia Gmez Research Analyst UNITE/HERE, Local 2 209 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102 [email removed] [phone removed], ext. 763show more

Julien Cahn · email · 2018-11-08 · oppose · source packet

Re: Supreme's Planning Dept. Hearing
Thanks so much Looking forward to meeting this afternoon after the hearing. Talking with Desi over text on the details of the meeting Best Ju +1 [phone removed] On Oct 25, 2018, at 10:34, Paul Barrera [email removed]> wrote: Julien & Taylor Thanks for this, and glad to hear your group is looking to collaborate with the Filipino community. In good faith, we'll refrain from asking for a delay at th… Thanks so much Looking forward to meeting this afternoon after the hearing. Talking with Desi over text on the details of the meeting Best Ju +1 [phone removed] On Oct 25, 2018, at 10:34, Paul Barrera [email removed]> wrote: Julien & Taylor Thanks for this, and glad to hear your group is looking to collaborate with the Filipino community. In good faith, we'll refrain from asking for a delay at the Planning hearing on October 25. But again, this is with the tacit understanding and contingent upon SOMA Pilipinas and Supreme meeting as soon as possible (if not this afternoon) to lay out our agreements for a formal, written MOU. Again, we won't be able to meet before the hearing, but Desi, our Economic Development Chair will reach out with a time for a meet-up later in the afternoon -- if he has not already. Thanks again Julien. Hope you're enjoying the City. - P Le mer. 24 oct. 2018 18:06, Julien Cahn [email removed]> a crit : Hi Paul and Desi I<U+2019>m sorry for the miscommunication, it was never with the intent to not respond. Just arrived in SF and would love to meet with you tomorrow before the hearing if you can (staying at THE PROPER) We are fully committed to be great community partners and neighbors, just want to do it right. In regards to all the great suggestions you made, we are interested in exploring how we can best work together to support Youth Culture and the local community. Best approach I believe is for us to sit down and build together in the most authentic way possible. Let me know when would be best for a phone call or coffee? Sorry again for the miscommunication Regards Julien Cahn On Oct 24, 2018, at 16:23, Paul Barrera [email removed]> wrote: Taylor and Julien, After repeated inquires from Desi and I about your interest in partnering with the SOMA Pilipinas Filipino Cultural District and Supreme<U+2019>s history of working with Community-Based Organizations, we've come to an impasse due to the lack of response on your end. That said, we're prepared to recommend to the SF Planning Department a delay of Supreme's conditional use permit. In response to initial contact from Supreme New York, our Cultural District has offered Supreme a variety of ways to collaborate with the Filipino community in San Francisco, from youth internships, to joining our future merchant association, to activating Stevenson Alley with us. It<U+2019>s important to our community that all new businesses, especially Formula Retiail (which tends to dwarf and push out smaller, locally-owned businesses <U+2013> something that has repeatedly happened to the South of Market community), seeking exemptions to the planning code demonstrate a good faith commitment to be good neighbors if they are going to economically benefit from being in the Cultural District that our people have cultivated and called home for more than a century. Please let me know if questions. Paul Barrera SOMA Pilipinas Community Engagement f~ RECEIVED Sowing the Seeds of Collaboration NOV 0 7 2018 November 8, 2018 Dear Planning Commission, CITY &COUNTY OF S.F PLANNING DEPARTMENT CPC/HPC am writing to voice my support for 1550 Evans remaining an open community space for Bayview Hunters Point residents and the surrounding neighborhoods. Although San Francisco is one of the wealthiest cities in the country, neighborhoods like the Bayview face tremendous environmental, economic, social and health disparities. The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission proposed new community center and open green space will allow Bayview residents better access to quality programs, resources and opportunities to reduce these disparities. BMAGIC's vision is to create and maintain a deeper unified road-map to social change that advances the educational, economic, health and juvenile justice needs of disadvantaged children, youth and their families in Bayview Hunters Point. We care about all aspects of our community, and a number of our programs are focused on our youth and on the parks and open spaces in the area. We have partnered with SFPUC to host events such as the Back to School Celebration &Back pack Giveaway and "Movie Nights in Our Parks" within open spaces. Studies have found that, open green spaces in urban environments, such as the Bayview, can fulfil a range of different roles, such as social spaces and areas for recreation and cultural purposes. They also have direct health benefits by providing residents spaces for physical activity and social interaction, and allowing much needed trauma restoration to take place. The accessibility of open green spaces also influences the likelihood of physical activity being undertaken and its frequency. Lowering likelihood of being overweight or obese and reduce symptoms of diabetes, depression and anxiety. Therefore, we hope that the Planning Commission will continue to support the SFPUC efforts to improve Bayview community. Respectfully, Lyslynn Lacoste, Esq. BMAGIC Director, San Francisco Office of the Public Defender BVHP Mobilization for Adolescent Growth in our Communities 555 Seventh Street, Suite 200 ~ San Francisco I CA 94103 communityC~bayviewmagic.org~ www.bayviewmagic.org ~ [phone removed] Patricia Sonnino and Richard Wayman 1650 Jackson Street #604 San Francisco, California 94109 October 29, 2018 San Francisco Planning Commission Jonas P. lonin, Commission Secretary 1650 Mission Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, California 94103 RECEIVE NOV 01 2018 Subject: Case 2016-000378CUA, November 8, 2018 CITY &COUNTY OF S.F. PLANNING DEPARTMENT 1600 Jackson Street CPC/HPC Dear Planning Commissioners: The proposal for a Whole Foods 365 at Polk and Jackson streets offers an extraordinary opportunity for the sustainable repurposing of a large vacant building into a grocery store that would well serve the needs of the immediate and nearby neighborhoods. The property does not offer a unique opportunity to create housing in the neighborhood, where several nearby sites are being considered for residential development or have been developed in recent years, as shown below: tl , ~. ~~~'w~il" k Location: SW corner of Van Ness &Pacific avenues, two blocks from subject site Status: Reportedly being considered for residential development Location: 2050 Van Ness Avenue/ 1675 Pacific Avenue, on same block as subject site Status: Application filed for multi-unit residential development d/ r ~ _ y ~ -~ ~ . t x~ i t ~ ~ ,- ~, r ~ _ ~~ ~1 -- ~ ~ t l lam, in;~~ ~ u~ ~~ Location: NE corner of Polk Street &Pacific Avenue, one block from subject site Status: Reportedly being considered for residential development Location: 1641 Jackson Street, across the street from 1600 Jackson (subject site) Status: Currently offered for sale as a residential development property San Francisco Planning Commission Location: 2101 Van Ness Avenue @Pacific Avenue, two blocks from subject site Status: Application filed for 48-unit development J Location: 1645 Pacific Avenue, on same block as subject site Status: 39 units, constructed in 2014 Location: The Marlow -1788 Clay Street @Van Ness Avenue, three blocks from subject site Status: 98 units, constructed in 2014 October 29, 2018 Page 2 Location: 1595 Pacific Avenue @Polk Street, across the street from subject site Status: 41 units, constructed in 2013 Location: 1868 Van Ness Avenue @Washington Street, two blocks from subject site Status: 35 units, constructed in 2017 Several additional residential developments outside of the immediate neighborhood but within walking distance of 16Q0 Jackson Street are either being considered for development, under construction, or recently constructed. Future and existing residents in the area would greatly benefit from afull-service grocery store at that location. Sincerely, ~~ / G Judith Robinson 562 B Lombard Street San Francisco, California 94133-7057 [phone removed] 22 October, 2018 TO: San Franciasco Planning Commission FROM; Judith Robinson, Telegraph Hill Resident RE: Oppose extended hours on Broadway for F Club <U+2014>Oct. 25 I strongly oppose extendin gclosing time from 2 a.m. to 4 a.m., proposed by the Penthouse Club on Broadway. It is my understanding that the Planning Department has recommended against the proposed extension of open hours. We in the neighborhood see no justification for such an extension, which further aggravates ongoing. problems attendant to such commerical activities on that neighborhood corridor. Approving an extension of open hours would be a precedent that other businesses would advocate, increasing problems in that area late at night. Please vote against such an extension of open hours. Thank you for considering my views. I am a long-time property owner on Telegraph Hill. cc: Mayor London Breed Supervisor Aaron Peskin Telegraph Hill Dwellers RECEIVED OCT 3 1 2018 CITY &COUNTY OF S.F. PLANNING DEPARTMENT CPC/HPCshow more

Carla Schlemminger · email · 2018-11-08 · support · source packet

Please vote for the Whole Foods 365 store on Polk
Dear Commissioners, Please vote YES to approve the proposed Whole Foods 365 store on 1600 Jackson at Polk Street in the old Lombardi<U+2019>s space. The quality of the produce, store concept, and price point are all appealing. I often walk to Polk from Pacific Heights and this would be another positive reason to go there. I don<U+2019>t see it competing with other local stores on the block, or even the cu… show more

Elaine Tanzman · email · 2018-11-08 · oppose · source packet

Re: Revised letter opposed to the 365 Store
Elaine Tanzman On Wednesday, November 7, 2018, 4:33:28 PM PST, Elaine Tanzman [email removed]> wrote: Dear Commissioners and city planners: Please see this revised letter opposing this store. Thanks, Elaine Tanzman

Mitchell Bearg · email · 2018-11-08 · oppose · source packet

1600 Jackson set
Planning Commissioners, I am writing in opposition to the issuance of a CUP for the WF365 at Polk and Jackson. It is my understanding that the property owner has figured out a way to bring the housing to 50% on the upper level after claiming it could not be done. This is the same person that claims they cannot build anymore housing above the existing structure. It would appear that the property owner is dictating wha… show more

Sukhjit Ghag · email · 2018-11-08 · oppose · source packet

Letter from a Nob Hill resident
It takes a lot for me to type out a correspondence but I recognize that the topic I want to talk to you about is too important to the health and well being of my neighborhood of 25 years. One of the reasons I hold on to a life in San Francisco is because of the uniqueness of the people who make it work. The everyday shopkeepers and small business on Polk Street are part of this character and I think we should do ev… show more

Joseph Omran Lebeau · email · 2018-11-08 · oppose · source packet

AMAZON 365 1600 Jackson st.
At a time with all municipalities, counties and states finding themselves dealing with an obvious shortage of housing, I find it amazing that this project continues to be presented with the least amount of housing possible? As members of the planning department, I would think that any project of this scope would require a maximum use of the property to provide as much housing as is feasible . Just look across the str… show more

Frank Burkatzky · email · 2018-11-08 · support · source packet

1600 Jackson Street Whole Foods 365 CUP
1650 Jackson Homeowners Association 1650 Jackson Street San Francisco, CA 94109 Case No. 2016-000378CUA 1600 Jackson Street Dear Commissioners: We at 1650 Jackson Street, a condominium building adjacent to 1600 Jackson Street consisting of 68 residential units and two retail units, support the proposed Whole Foods 365 project with residential units on Jackson and Polk streets. A poll of our residents voted … 1650 Jackson Homeowners Association 1650 Jackson Street San Francisco, CA 94109 Case No. 2016-000378CUA 1600 Jackson Street Dear Commissioners: We at 1650 Jackson Street, a condominium building adjacent to 1600 Jackson Street consisting of 68 residential units and two retail units, support the proposed Whole Foods 365 project with residential units on Jackson and Polk streets. A poll of our residents voted overwhelmingly in favor of this project. We are very pleased that Whole Foods 365 and Village Properties have not given up on our neighborhood and have worked diligently with the Planning Commission to come up with a solution that everyone could be satisfied. We would like to remind the commissioners that our neighborhood turned down a proposal for a ban on formula retail and we have no objection to a store such as Whole Foods 365 being a part of our neighborhood. We already have numerous vacant retail sites on Polk Street between Broadway and California Streets and believe that this project would greatly boost all retail on Polk Street and would bring much needed foot traffic to the neighborhood in addition to supplying us with an affordable grocery store within walking distance of our neighbors. Having a full- service grocery would complement the offerings of the small retail businesses in the neighborhood such as Cheese Plus, Bel Campo Meats, and The Jug Shop, which are not on everyone's budget nor are they appropriate for everyday shopping. We would also like to reiterate the fact that the building at 1600 Jackson is a viable one and a perfect spot for this project. We believe it is wasteful to destroy a building such as this and goes against all that San Francisco stands for. Our neighborhood has increased in density and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future. We need to keep up with the requirements of a growing neighborhood with a full service grocery and anchor store such as Whole Foods 365. This store will also improve walkability for our neighborhood and will work along with the Transit First requirements of San Francisco. Finally, we object to the many forces outside of our neighborhood who are vehemently opposed to this project. We believe the neighbors should carry weight in their own neighborhood. We also object to the stance of the MPNA who has taken no poll in the neighborhood to verify their stance. Please listen to the voices of the people who actually live in this neighborhood and approve this project so that we can finally see some progress on this issue. Thank you. Best regards, Frank Burkatzky, President Dick Wayman, Vice President Lindsey Kotterman, Secretary Bob Kamm, Treasurer Karen Dold, Member-At-Largeshow more

Carol Ann Rogers · email · 2018-11-08 · support · source packet

Case #2016-00378CUA - Whole Foods 365 at 1600 Jackson Street - SUPPORT
Dear Mr. Ionin, Attached please find a letter of support from Russian Hill Neighbors for the newly modified conditional use proposal that includes eight housing units. Thank you for including this in the Planning Commission packet prepared for the November 8, 2018 Commission Meeting. Carol Ann Rogers, President RHN [phone removed]

Sloat Van Winkle · email · 2018-11-08 · support · source packet

YES on Whole Foods 365 at Polk and Jackson
Hi I<U+2019>m a resident of the neighborhood and live 2 blocks away from the too-long empty Lombardi Sports Store. We very much need a grocery akin the the proposed 365, much more than yet another bland expensive condominium building. I feel that the opposing view is unrealistic to suggest that value-priced housing can be constructed at that location and at this time of our real estate cycle. It is a detrim… show more

Julia French · email · 2018-11-08 · support · source packet

Support Whole Foods 365 at 1600 Jackson St
Dear Commissioners, My husband and I have not been able to attend the hearings regarding the proposed opening of Whole Foods 365 at 1600 Jackson St because they have been during the work day, but I am writing to express my enthusiastic support for the revised proposal, which provides our area with desperately needed fairly priced groceries, additional housing, and hundreds of jobs. PLEASE do not destroy this amazing … show more

Diane Daniels · email · 2018-11-08 · support · source packet

Re: Case #2016-00378CUA - Whole Foods 365 at 1600 Jackson
Dear Commissioners: Once again I want to state my complete support of opening a Whole Foods 365 at 1600 Jackson St. As a senior who is finding the walk to Whole Foods on California a little long, I look forward to the close location and perhaps lower prices of a local 365. regards, Diane Daniels 1450 Greenwich St #503 San Francisco, CA 94109 On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 11:05 AM Diane Daniels [email removed]> wrote: … show more

Joyce Kuchervy · spoken · 2018-11-08 · support

Need supermarket, quality of life

Vasu Narayanan · spoken · 2018-11-08 · oppose

Housing

Greg Carr · spoken · 2018-11-08 · support

Need grocery store

Karen Dold · spoken · 2018-11-08 · support

Empty storefronts

Jerry Dratler · spoken · 2018-11-08 · oppose

Square footage

Cynthia Gomez · spoken · 2018-11-08 · oppose

Inappropriate for neighborhood

Laura Clark · spoken · 2018-11-08 · oppose

Housing

Paul Webber · spoken · 2018-11-08 · oppose

Housing crisis

Diane Carroll · spoken · 2018-11-08 · support

Need services

John Addeo · spoken · 2018-11-08 · support

Need grocery store

Judith Robby · spoken · 2018-11-08 · support

Need anchor destination with services

Barbara Bahagan · spoken · 2018-11-08 · support

Need grocery store in Russian Hill

Tim McLaughlin · spoken · 2018-11-08 · oppose

Small business impacts

Michael Priolo · spoken · 2018-11-08 · oppose

Business preservation

Joshua Devore · spoken · 2018-11-08 · oppose

Use size limits

Stephanie Peek · spoken · 2018-11-08 · oppose

Housing

Anastasia Yovanopoulos · spoken · 2018-11-08 · oppose

Need more housing

George Wooding · spoken · 2018-11-08 · oppose

Opposed

Frank Cannata · spoken · 2018-11-08 · oppose

Housing crisis

Jim Warshell · spoken · 2018-11-08 · oppose

8 housing units not a benefit

Duncan Ley · spoken · 2018-11-08 · oppose

8 housing units not a benefit

Chris Kavinski · spoken · 2018-11-08 · oppose

8 housing units not a benefit

Jim Reuben · spoken · 2018-11-08 · neutral

Project presentation

Lorenzo Rios · spoken · 2018-11-08 · oppose

7th store in SF

Thomas Madland · spoken · 2018-11-08 · support

Need grocery store

Richard Cardello · spoken · 2018-11-08 · support

Added housing

Carol Ann Rodgers · spoken · 2018-11-08 · support

Need full service grocery store

Mitchell Burg · spoken · 2018-11-08 · oppose

Amazon

Leslie Bull · spoken · 2018-11-08 · support

Need grocery store

Tina Moylan · spoken · 2018-11-08 · support

Need more grocery stores, services

Kate Chase · spoken · 2018-11-08 · oppose

Housing

Marlayne Morgan · spoken · 2018-11-08 · oppose

Impacts

Elaine Tangsmen · spoken · 2018-11-08 · oppose

Traffic

Dawn Trennert · spoken · 2018-11-08 · oppose

Inclusionary housing

Chris Schulman · spoken · 2018-11-08 · oppose

Housing

Richard Wayland · spoken · 2018-11-08 · support

Supports

Anne Brubaker · spoken · 2018-11-08 · support

Want grocery store

Ann Marie Einselen · spoken · 2018-11-08 · oppose

Need housing

Patrick Hawktal · spoken · 2018-11-08 · oppose

Densification

Nick Matthiesson · spoken · 2018-11-08 · oppose

Housing crisis

Kevin Gleason · spoken · 2018-11-08 · oppose

Need housing

Leslie Van Dyke · spoken · 2018-11-08 · oppose

Against proposed development

Roy Chan · spoken · 2018-11-08 · oppose

Significant impacts

Sandra Fish · spoken · 2018-11-08 · oppose

Death of quality neighborhoods (F) Speaker – Small business needs protection

Melissa Gutierrez · spoken · 2018-11-08 · oppose

Need more housing

Rick Barry · spoken · 2018-11-08 · oppose

Need housing not grocery store

Sarah Taber · spoken · 2018-11-08 · support

Need grocery store nearby

Ozzie Rohm · spoken · 2018-11-08 · oppose

Housing

2018-11-15 · 3 comments · 3 / 0

Richard Cardello · email · 2018-11-15 · support · source packet

RE: RHN / WHOLE FOODS 365, 1600 JACKSON ST, Case No. 2016-000378CUA PLANNING
COMMISSION HEARING DATE 11-08-2018 Case No. 2016-000378CUA AND 2016-00038VAR PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING DATE 11-08-2018 AGENDA ITEMS 14a AND 14b WHOLE FOODS 365, 1600 JACKSON AT POLK CONDITIONAL USE AND VARIANCE APPLICATIONS President Hillis, Commissioners and Zoning Administrator Sanchez: I am Richard Cardello and have lived on Russian Hill for almost 36 years. You well know the long process-history … show more

Jeff Shouger · email · 2018-11-15 · support · source packet

Re: Whole Foods 365 on Polk & Jackson
Just following up on Whole Foods today. I continue to be for allowing them to open the store in our neighborhood. They have done an amazing job trying to jump over ever hurdle the city has put in their way. If this doesn<U+2019>t show commitment to the neighborhood I<U+2019>m not sure what would. I can<U+2019>t make it to the hearing because I have to work. But please record this as… Just following up on Whole Foods today. I continue to be for allowing them to open the store in our neighborhood. They have done an amazing job trying to jump over ever hurdle the city has put in their way. If this doesn<U+2019>t show commitment to the neighborhood I<U+2019>m not sure what would. I can<U+2019>t make it to the hearing because I have to work. But please record this as my vote and support for the store. Thank you. On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 8:31 AM Cassie Shouger [email removed]> wrote: Good morning everyone. Thanks for doing nothing to address the situation! Cassie Shouger [email removed] [phone removed] Sent from my iPhone On Apr 29, 2018, at 8:04 AM, Jeff shouger [email removed]> wrote: It looks like they have taken hostage the corner as well as one of the city bikes. Jeff Jeff Shouger [phone removed] [email removed] Skype: jeff.shouger www.linkedin.com/in/shouger On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 11:41 AM, Cassie Shouger [email removed]> wrote: Still here - 311 has been contacted a dozen times and have done nothing.<image1.jpeg> Cassie Shouger [email removed] [phone removed] Sent from my iPhone On Apr 27, 2018, at 6:48 PM, Jeff shouger [email removed]> wrote: And the person is still there camping out at 6pm....... On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 9:51 AM Cassie Shouger [email removed]> wrote: Good morning from 1650, I can't tell you how disappointed I am that after dozens of residents expressed their desire to have a 365 in the neighborhood last night, we were essentially turned down because of your own personal, individual, isolated negative experiences and/or vendettas against whole foods or amazon or Jeff Bezos. It became blatantly obvious how out of touch our planning commission is with the realities we, as residents, face every single day. Quite frankly, it reminded my of Zuckerberg congressional hearing. Let me remind you that Amazon alone employs more than 30,000 people in the state of california. That's not including the thousands of seasonal workers they hire over the holidays. They are going to extreme measures to be good corporate citizens and are making huge strides in their effort to work towards a sustainable future. I love living in SF. I'm from a small town in Kentucky and living here has been a dream of mine. My father grew up in Pacific Heights, went to Town and Lowell and UCSF and USF grad school. Never did I imagine I'd spend 1.3mm for a 1000 sq ft condo but nevertheless I love the city. A whole foods is just what we need in the polk neighborhood. A convenient grocery store and an anchor shop would bring added foot traffic and security. The argument that small retailers would suffer is lame. Go ahead, keep the space vacant for another 4 years, keep the surrounding streets filthy with trash and scattered with the unpredictable behavior of drug addicts - PEOPLE DON'T COME TO POLK BECAUSE IT'S DISGUSTING. HOW DOES THAT HELP SMALL BUSINESSES? It's ridiculous that I have to move out of this neighborhood to feel safe again and THAT"s a sure fire way to lose my family's business. I'll continue to send you pictures like the ones attached from this morning. From here on out you'll get to see some of what I encounter on my morning walk with my dogs. I hope that you'll become better informed. Thank you. Cassie Shouger ---------- Forwarded message ----------show more

Frank Burkatzky · email · 2018-11-15 · support · source packet

Final Remarks 1600 Jackson St. from Hearing 11/8/18
Subject: 1600 Jackson Street, Case No. 2016-000378CUAVAR From: Karen Dold 1650 Jackson St. 504 San Francisco, CA 94109 Dear Planning Commissioners, My name is Karen Dold and I live directly next door to the proposed Whole Foods 365 site at 1650 Jackson St. I am a resident/owner and have lived here since 1991. I support the Whole Foods 365 mixed-use project. 1) Between the six blocks of C… Subject: 1600 Jackson Street, Case No. 2016-000378CUAVAR From: Karen Dold 1650 Jackson St. 504 San Francisco, CA 94109 Dear Planning Commissioners, My name is Karen Dold and I live directly next door to the proposed Whole Foods 365 site at 1650 Jackson St. I am a resident/owner and have lived here since 1991. I support the Whole Foods 365 mixed-use project. 1) Between the six blocks of California and Broadway Streets on Polk Street, there are 14 empty storefronts plus two pop-up stores. There are two large buildings - one which held the Big Apple Market - our neighborhood full service grocery store until about 5 years ago. The other is the 1600 Jackson Street space, formerly Lombardi's. Since the closing of The Big Apple Market, we have had no full-service, reasonably priced grocer in our neighborhood. The Big Apple co-existed along with Cheese Plus, the Cheese Store before that and Real Foods on Polk and all were fine. 2) There is a small produce, corner style market on Polk at California Streets called the Golden Veggie Market. It is within two blocks away from both Whole Foods on California Street and Trader Joe's at California and Hyde Street. It is thriving. 3) I see the addition of Whole Foods 365 as a store which would complement our local small shops such as Cheese Plus, Bel Campo Meats, and The Jug Shop. In no way do I see this wonderful addition to our neighborhood as competition with existing shops as we have already had a full service grocery store on Polk St. 4) Our neighborhood has already changed with the addition of many large condominiuim and apartment buildings. We are more dense than we have ever been. The small antique and charming stores along Polk Street are mostly gone, replaced by coffee shops, nail salons, gyms and massage businesses. We need a full service grocery store to replace what we have lost and to bring an anchor to our dying street. Whole Foods will bring more people which will benefit residents and store owners alike,helping Polk to thrive. 5) I strongly oppose our neighborhood merchants who we are expected to support but who do not support this neighborhood and do not live in it. I oppose the stance the MPNA has taken against the people it is supposed to represent without polling the neighborhood or divulging exactly how many members they actually have and not how many they have on their email roster. 6) I applaud both Whole Foods 365 and Village Properties for continuing to go through this process with us. We could not ask for better neighborhood outreach or partners. I also support their desire to use this viable building in the interest of sustainability. Thank you, Karen Doldshow more

2018-11-29 · 1 comments · 0 / 1

Teresa Nittolo · email · 2018-11-29 · oppose · source packet

whole foods at lomabardi's space outcome...
good morning, i just wanted to thank you all for denying the whole foods project aka amazon. as a small business owner on polk street i feel like this was a small victory for many small businesses every where. i myself went back and forth thinking if this could actually be good for our business corridor...after much reading and talking to other businesses, my thoughts remain, NO it's not good! i personally fe… show more

1600 Jackson Street (365 by Whole Foods Market)

Hearings

Comments by hearing (237)