214 STATES ST

2017-12-07 · 3 comments · 0 / 3

Rick Goldman · email · 2017-12-07 · oppose · source packet

Opposition to CUA for 214 States Street PA # 2015-0416-3876
Dear Commissioners: I oppose the CU application as currently proposed. As a resident of this neighborhood, I have fought very hard with other neighbors to protect the rear yards of through lots like 214 States. Initially, protection for rear yards on through lots were put in place as interim controls by Supervisor Weiner. Recently, these interim controls became permanent, thanks to the help of Supervisor Sh… Dear Commissioners: I oppose the CU application as currently proposed. As a resident of this neighborhood, I have fought very hard with other neighbors to protect the rear yards of through lots like 214 States. Initially, protection for rear yards on through lots were put in place as interim controls by Supervisor Weiner. Recently, these interim controls became permanent, thanks to the help of Supervisor Sheehy. These controls should be respected. Although the current CUA does keep the rear yard fronting Museum Way, the current CU does leave open the possibility of a project sponsor coming back at a later date to add an additional unit fronting Museum Way. I am concerned that a project sponsor will argue that it would not be feasible to add a second unit to the new house fronting States Street, and thus would seek permission to build the second unit on Museum Way. By doing the development in two stages, a project sponsor will be able to subvert the intent of the permanent controls to protect rear yards on through lots. Given the misrepresentations about the project that the current project sponsor has already made (documented in other correspondences), I do not think we can rely on the word of the project sponsor not to be considering such an option. Therefore, I request that the commissioners do what is in their power to ensure that the rear yard facing Museum Way is protected in the future. There are a few options available to the commission that would be acceptable, including: 1. Reject the CU and have the project sponsor come back with a design for a 2 unit building on States Street to max out the density on the through lot. This would support the goal of increasing the housing supply. If another unit was added within the same envelope, I would support the project. 2. Reject the CU and have the project sponsor come back with a design where it would be feasible to add a unit at a later date to the already developed States Street frontage of the lot. 3. Add a stipulation to the CU (or some other appropriate document) that approval of the CU would prevent any development on Museum Way for at least 20 years (preferably longer). Thank you for your consideration on this matter. Respectfully yours, Rick Goldman 230 States Streetshow more

Gary Weiss · email · 2017-12-07 · oppose · source packet

214 States St. OPPOSITION
214 States St. OPPOSITION

Dirk Aguilar · email · 2017-12-07 · oppose · source packet

214 States Street: Opposing Conditional Use (2015-0416-3876)
Dear Planning Commission, My neighbors and I have actively worked with Supervisors Wiener and Sheehy to protect the character and open space of Corona Heights, all the while increasing its housing stock. I oppose the current proposal at 214 States Street, because it gives the project sponsors the option of adding a second building to the Museum Way frontage of the same lot in the future, using the argument that t… show more

2017-12-14 · 10 comments · 5 / 4

Chrisman Hollings · spoken · 2017-12-14 · support

Support

Joel Hallowell · spoken · 2017-12-14 · oppose

Opposition

Rick Goldman · spoken · 2017-12-14 · oppose

Opposition

MaryAnne Drosuer · spoken · 2017-12-14 · oppose

Support for 2 units

Erin Eisenburg · spoken · 2017-12-14 · support

Support

Hoa Su · spoken · 2017-12-14 · support

Good people

Bill Newtson · spoken · 2017-12-14 · support

Support

Georgia Schuttish · spoken · 2017-12-14 · neutral

It's a mess

Jessica Rui · spoken · 2017-12-14 · support

Support

Maryann Dresner · email · 2017-12-14 · oppose · source packet

[email removed]
to the Planning Commission of the City and County of San Francisco: I am a resident of the Corona Heights neighborhood of San Francisco, and I have been living in that neighborhood for more than twenty years. I and many of my neighbors have worked with Supervisors Wiener and, once Mr. Weiner moved to Sacramento, Supervisor Sheehy to protect the open space of Corona Heights, while at the same time, increasing its … show more

2017-12-21 · 1 comments · 0 / 1

Chris Parkes · email · 2017-12-21 · oppose · source packet

Dec 14 Hearing on 214 States St.
Dear Mr. Ionin, May I please request electronic copies of the materials submitted, including speaker cards, at the Dec 14 Planning Commission Hearing for the 214 States Street project? I would also like to request electronic copies of the materials submitted during General Public comment (Dec 14). These materials were provided by Mr. Cheng re: demolition. Thank you, Chris Parkes 231 States St. [phone removed]

2018-03-15 · 5 comments · 1 / 3

Sonja Renner · email · 2018-03-15 · oppose · source packet

For 3/15 hearing: opposing 214 States Street (2014.1459CUA)
Dear Planning Commission, I am writing in opposition to the proposed project at 214 States Street. My worry is that after developing 214 States Street the project sponsor will come back and build a second structure on the Museum Way side of the same lot. At that point he could use housing creation as his principal argument. While I am not opposed to the creation of housing units, I am siding with the Planning D… show more

Georgia Schuttish · spoken · 2018-03-15 · neutral

BIC schedule

Kevin Chang · spoken · 2018-03-15 · support

Requesting continuance

Chris Parks · spoken · 2018-03-15 · oppose

Do not continue

Dirk Aguilar · email · 2018-03-15 · oppose · source packet

For 3/15 hearing: opposing 214 States Street (2014.1459CUA)
Dear Planning Commission, I am writing in opposition to the proposed project at 214 States Street. My worry is that after developing 214 States Street the project sponsor will come back and build a second structure on the Museum Way side of the same lot. At that point he could use housing creation as his principal argument. While I am not opposed to the creation of housing units, I am siding with the Planning D… show more

2018-07-12 · 11 comments · 6 / 4

Joseph Hollands · spoken · 2018-07-12 · support

Support

Steve Brown · spoken · 2018-07-12 · support

Support

Chris LeBlanc · spoken · 2018-07-12 · support

Support

Jeff Poe · spoken · 2018-07-12 · support

Support

Rick Goldman · spoken · 2018-07-12 · oppose

Opposition

Joseph Butler · spoken · 2018-07-12 · oppose

Opposition

Chris Parks · spoken · 2018-07-12 · oppose

Opposition

Mike Schulte · spoken · 2018-07-12 · oppose

Opposition

Todd Mavis · spoken · 2018-07-12 · support

Project presentation

Patrick O'Riordan · spoken · 2018-07-12 · neutral

DBI staff report

Daniel Camp · spoken · 2018-07-12 · support

Support

214 STATES ST

Hearings

Comments by hearing (30)