2018-05-24 · 20 comments · 2 / 18
Kenneth Cowen · spoken · 2018-05-24 · oppose
DR presentation, not in character with the neighborhood
Case #2013.0847DRPMembers of the planning commission: I am the owner of 1453-1455 Francisco Street. I have been the owner for over 10 years. While I feel all property owners have the right to improve and update their investments, the drawings and renderings for the proposed new structure at 1503 Francisco significantly depart from existing design of buildings within the currently existing Marina neighborhood. The proposed changes… Members of the planning commission: I am the owner of 1453-1455 Francisco Street. I have been the owner for over 10 years. While I feel all property owners have the right to improve and update their investments, the drawings and renderings for the proposed new structure at 1503 Francisco significantly depart from existing design of buildings within the currently existing Marina neighborhood. The proposed changes for floor to ceiling windows facing the street are indicative of commercial high rise style. This style of building is not currently found on Francisco Street and I have been informed that the planned design is also unseen in the Marina as a whole. The planning commission has the obligation to insure that all improvements fit within the neighborhood. In this instance the current proposed design should be rejected so that the owner can formulate a proposed design which is consistent with current building structures in this residential neighborhood. Respectfully, Conor M. Kellyshow more 1503-1507 Francisco - Public HearingDear San Francisco Planning Commissioners I am writing in regards to the Public Hearing on the proposed remodel of 1503-1507 Francisco. Due to work requirements I am unable to attend the hearing in person. I am a resident owner of 3254 Octavia Street. I live across the road from the property under review. I also understand the same owners have purchased the adjacent property at 3255-57 Octavia Street which is dir… Dear San Francisco Planning Commissioners I am writing in regards to the Public Hearing on the proposed remodel of 1503-1507 Francisco. Due to work requirements I am unable to attend the hearing in person. I am a resident owner of 3254 Octavia Street. I live across the road from the property under review. I also understand the same owners have purchased the adjacent property at 3255-57 Octavia Street which is directly across from me. The view from my window is in the attached photo. One of the things that charmed me about owning in the neighborhood is that the character of the buildings are very homogeneous. I love the colorful 1920s style facades which give San Francisco such a unique and special feel. I often see tourists in the area enjoying sedge-way tours and taking in the neighborhood's character on their way from the hotels on Lombard Street to Fort Mason. The proposed very modern glass facades seem very out of keeping with the rest of this section of Octavia Street and Francisco Street. The corner lot is very prominent with a larger street frontage than neighboring building so will stick out like a sore thumb. I'm also very concerned that as the building next door recently sold to the same owner, that this will set a precedent for 3255 Octavia to receive a similar treatment and that I will soon be faced with a view of glass boxes and all of the glare and lack of privacy that comes with such buildings. The project doesn't add anything to the housing stock in the area and overall detracts from the neighborhood's unique San Francisco look and feel. I grew up in a rather bland, modern suburb in a city that was quick to "modernize" but ended up loosing any distinct character. San Francisco's commitment to planning with it's history makes it a unique and special place to call home. I have no objection to the additional story as it is consistent with the other corner lots nor to the parking lift but while it may be a very lovely, modern glass box my hope is that the planning commission and architects can modify the design to keep it more in keeping with the character of the neighborhood. Thank you for your consideration. Regards Caroline Bremner 3254 Octavia Streetshow more 1503-07 Francisco Street Construction Project / Discretionary Review HearingIt has come to my attention I should have copied you on correspondence recently sent to the Commission in regards to the project referenced above in order for it to be entered into the the public record. The following is representative of an email I sent to all Planning Commission members on Monday, May 21st. Thanks and regards, -af Andrew Ferrier [email removed] [phone removed] Begin forwarded message: … It has come to my attention I should have copied you on correspondence recently sent to the Commission in regards to the project referenced above in order for it to be entered into the the public record. The following is representative of an email I sent to all Planning Commission members on Monday, May 21st. Thanks and regards, -af Andrew Ferrier [email removed] [phone removed] Begin forwarded message: I<U+2019>m writing you to vehemently oppose the proposed construction project at 1503-07 Francisco Street. I live at 3256 Octavia Street which is directly across the street from half of this building. I have grave concerns about the appropriateness of the architectural design and the negative impact it would have on our neighborhood. I have had the opportunity to confer with many neighbors and while there has admittedly been a little confusion about the process for filing a formal objection, the reactions I<U+2019>ve heard have been consistently opposed to this project. I am planning to attend Thursday<U+2019>s meeting to voice my opinion in person, but wanted to preview some of my concerns: Architectural design is more akin to an office building; not a residential neighborhood Unique characteristics of our city<U+2019>s districts help define San Francisco<U+2019>s overall visual appeal Stark industrial concept is drastically inconsistent with aesthetic of Marina district; the project is too much of a departure from its surroundings Excessive use of glass raises concerns about privacy, glare, and light trespass and appears to be significantly beyond what is approved for remodels in this neighborhood Project appears to circumvent spirt and ruling of planning commission process (a prior attempt to re- design was denied in 2015 when it became apparent the intention was to reduce number of units) True intent of this project appears to be to create a massive single family residence versus adhering to how the property is zoned I am not the type of individual that is adverse to change and I wouldn<U+2019>t take issue with a reasonable plan for development. This project, however, is an egregious departure from the neighborhood aesthetic and introduces no redeeming qualities that I can discern. I strongly encourage the Planning Commission to assess the impact this design would have on this neighborhood and whether its style is emblematic of this particular area of our wonderful city. I can<U+2019>t help but conclude this project detracts greatly from the its surroundings and is potentially only a benefit for the individual who is trying to put it in motion. I greatly appreciate your consideration and look forward to voicing my concerns on Thursday. -af Andrew Ferrier 3256 Octavia Street [email removed] [phone removed]show more 1503 - 1507 Francisco Street, SF Case #2013.0847DRPMay 23, 2018 President Rich Hillis San Francisco Planning Commission 1650 Mission Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94103 Re: 1503 Francisco Street Brief in Opposition to the Project and in support of Discretionary Review Planning Department Case No. 2013.0847DRP Dear President Hillis and Commissioners: My sister, Donna Santana and I are the owners of 1490 Francisco Street in SF. We requested a Discretionary Revi… May 23, 2018 President Rich Hillis San Francisco Planning Commission 1650 Mission Street, Suite 400 San Francisco, CA 94103 Re: 1503 Francisco Street Brief in Opposition to the Project and in support of Discretionary Review Planning Department Case No. 2013.0847DRP Dear President Hillis and Commissioners: My sister, Donna Santana and I are the owners of 1490 Francisco Street in SF. We requested a Discretionary Review for the 1503 <U+2013> 1507 Francisco proposed project. To provide a bit of background about us, we are fourth generation Marina / San Franciscans. Our property has been in our family since the early 1940<U+2019>s. We were born, raised and have lived in the Marina for a greater part of our lives. I personally lived in the building for several years as well. Our adult children currently live in the building. We are not just random landlords who own an apartment building in the Marina.1490 Francisco and the Marina neighborhood is an intimate part of our family and our legacy. Professionally, I am a 28+ year residential top producing well respected Realtor and sell homes in Marin, San Francisco and Sonoma counties. As stated in our DR application, our major concerns are over the overall design of the 1503- 1507 Francisco proposed project. The design presented does not conform to the classic Marina district architecture nor the community character. For someone to state otherwise is preposterous. The excessive glazing as noted in the proposed design is such that it creates major concern for immense glare, unwanted reflections, as well as major privacy issues that will directly impact surrounding building<U+2019>s residents. This mass structure will impede our light and air as it currently stands. The use of a sterile concrete exterior vs the traditional stucco found in the Marina, especially for a corner building is simply inappropriate. The underground parking, with added car lifts, would require major underground excavation which will only compromise the soil stability of surrounding properties. The enormity of the structure includes not only a 5th level roof deck but also an expansive 2nd deck off a lower floor, which would be street facing. It is our understanding that roof decks and most certainly street facing ones are not something that the SF board approves in the Marina neighborhood. As that was certainly the case for us personally for our own building in 2011 and yet again just a few years later. We were denied our two roof deck applications, which were very similar to the two roof decks being proposed for 1503 Francisco. In the past 10 years or so, we did an extensive remodel to our property, which included window upgrades. It was mandatory from the planning dept that we conform to the character of the neighborhood to include like-kind wood sash classic Marina style windows. There was no exception granted for this. Period. We know this to be fact even with other neighbors who followed the permit procedures necessary for similar improvements to their properties. We feel that the City's interpretations of codes and guidelines should be applied equally to all projects, it<U+2019>s only fair. After the 1989 earthquake, so many single family and multi-unit homes were demolished and rebuilt from the ground up (See example photos attached). Every property involved was rebuilt with like-kind classic Marina architecture. This is another proven example as to why the 1503-07 Francisco design is not in line with the Marina neighborhood standards. It is just not appropriate for this area. Contrary to Tom Tunny<U+2019>s position in his letter to the commissioners dated May 10th, I very much disagree with statements made. On March 8th, my sister and I had a 45+ minute detailed phone conversation with Eric Jacobs, the permit expeditor for the 1503 <U+2013> 1507 Francisco property owner. Donna and I ended the conversation with Eric friendly but clear that we opposed the project as presented and with the understanding that he was going to get back to us quickly with answers to a few questions we had about the project. It was not until about a week after our conference call and only after we submitted the DR application to planning dept on March 12, 2018 is when we received a follow up email from Eric ( March 15, 2018/March 27, 2018). In short, the email correspondence stated that the property owner was only willing to accommodate the removal of the penthouse (aka rooftop staircase bulkhead) of the proposed mass to satisfy our concerns with the project design. (see attached emails). We clearly are not the ones unwilling to negotiate. There is great concern among dozens of neighbors unanimously voicing very strong opposition and additionally are in support of this discretionary review. I know you have heard from several. Numerous residents have stated that they never received any notification from the project applicant and/ or knew nothing about this proposed project. Several mentioned that it was only just a few days ago, when they first they had heard about the project, either by the recent efforts from the 1503 Francisco team who was going door to door seeking signatures from neighbors in hopes of their support; or from the poster placed on the building exterior within the past 10 days. With so much public outcry voicing such strong opposition, it is impossible to not think that somehow the project applicant did not follow proper protocol with the 311 notifications to the neighborhood as required. In summary, the planning guidelines imposed need to be fair, equal and respectful to all applicants and property owners or neighbors. I hope that the board will work with us towards the preservation of the classic Marina neighborhood, which includes keeping within the conformity, the architectural design and imposing the guidelines equally for all to follow. The Marina district is a very special part of San Francisco<U+2019>s history and culture, I ask that the board do what is right and mandate discretionary review of this project. Thank you. Christina McNair Christina McNair Team McNair Golden Gate Sotheby's International Realty Selling Marin - SF - Sonoma Counties [email removed] [phone removed] BRE# 01183576show more 1503-1507 Francisco St.Dear Commissioners, I have owned a unit at 1500 Francisco St. since 1985. During those years, there have been many changes to buildings in the Marina, most notably after the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. In the majority of instances, the remodeled buildings respected the unique vernacular of Marina architecture. The proposed project does not. I strongly oppose the project at 1503-1507 Francisco St. for two major… Dear Commissioners, I have owned a unit at 1500 Francisco St. since 1985. During those years, there have been many changes to buildings in the Marina, most notably after the 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake. In the majority of instances, the remodeled buildings respected the unique vernacular of Marina architecture. The proposed project does not. I strongly oppose the project at 1503-1507 Francisco St. for two major reasons; 1) the scale of the proposed project is way out of line with other buildings in the neighborhood. Being on a corner draws even more attention to its out-of-proportion size, and 2) the amount of glazing. One issue with the glazing is the excessive glare it would cause, especially on the long west-facing side, which would have an adverse affect on neighbors across the street. Another issue is reduced privacy for surrounding neighbors. I urge you to deny approval of the project as it is submitted. Thank- you, Betty Aten, Owner 1500 Francisco St. #4show more At 5/24 hearing 1503 Francisco Street 2013.0847DRPDear Brittany, Good morning. Hope all is well. This is a very astounding project, perhaps similar to the one at 3790 21st Street, but the transformation from stucco walls to glass walls seems extreme. I find the Demo Calcs as portrayed on Sheet A-0.2 confusing and I wondered if they should have a further explanation at the hearing today? Also is there any issue of tenant removal from this property at 1503 Francisc… Dear Brittany, Good morning. Hope all is well. This is a very astounding project, perhaps similar to the one at 3790 21st Street, but the transformation from stucco walls to glass walls seems extreme. I find the Demo Calcs as portrayed on Sheet A-0.2 confusing and I wondered if they should have a further explanation at the hearing today? Also is there any issue of tenant removal from this property at 1503 Francisco? (The Housing Balance Report which is also on the Agenda today, shows loss of 180 protected units in the Marina). Thank you and have a nice day. Sincerely, Georgia Sent from my iPadshow more Re: Opposition 1503-1507 Francisco Construction Project[email removed] I truly hope we can preserve this neighborhood. Thank you again for your consideration! On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 9:10 PM, Benna Wise [email removed]> wrote: Hello! I'm writing to you because when I received a notice from the building about construction across the street from me (1500 Francisco Street), the infomation they provided made it seem like they were only planning on doing constru… [email removed] I truly hope we can preserve this neighborhood. Thank you again for your consideration! On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 9:10 PM, Benna Wise [email removed]> wrote: Hello! I'm writing to you because when I received a notice from the building about construction across the street from me (1500 Francisco Street), the infomation they provided made it seem like they were only planning on doing construction on the roof. I just saw their entire plan from a neighbor and - WOW. It's awful! Part of the reason I love SF and moved to this neighborhood was the charm. I would expect this in SOMA, but it would be so sad to see old SF start turning as well. I thought there were regulations protecting the old architecture here. Really hope we can stop this construction. I feel bad that they went through the effort to do this, but I wish they had been more forthcoming originally. This will really be an eyesore in the neighborhood and devalue the neighborhood. Thank you for considering! Benna Wiseshow more Thomas Ryan · spoken · 2018-05-24 · support
Project presentation
Jeff Menasci · spoken · 2018-05-24 · support
Owner comments
Marie Oratta · spoken · 2018-05-24 · oppose
Opposed
Frank Lima · spoken · 2018-05-24 · oppose
Opposition
Nancy Garcekini · spoken · 2018-05-24 · oppose
Opposition
Lorraine Quait · spoken · 2018-05-24 · oppose
Opposition
Phillip Mesa · spoken · 2018-05-24 · oppose
Opposition
Pam Davis · spoken · 2018-05-24 · oppose
Notification
Maria Ferrell · spoken · 2018-05-24 · oppose
Opposed
Michael Garivalia · spoken · 2018-05-24 · oppose
DR presentation
Rich Morriti · spoken · 2018-05-24 · oppose
Opposed
Building Permit Application for 1503-1507Dear Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors: I urge the San Francisco Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors to deny the building permit application for 1503-1507 Francisco Street (Proposed Project). I purchased property at 1500 Francisco Street last year and my unit is on the fourth floor and faces South, directly across from the Proposed Project. Two of the primary reasons I purchased my property w… Dear Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors: I urge the San Francisco Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors to deny the building permit application for 1503-1507 Francisco Street (Proposed Project). I purchased property at 1500 Francisco Street last year and my unit is on the fourth floor and faces South, directly across from the Proposed Project. Two of the primary reasons I purchased my property was the charm and aesthetic of the neighborhood as well as the amount of light that flooded my condominium. I have lived in San Francisco for 20 years and have always been drawn to the charming aesthetic of the Marina in particular. The Proposed Project will destroy the architectural character of the surrounding area as it is a modern, floor-to-ceiling glass and concrete structure on a prominent corner of the Marina. Drawings of the Proposed Project reveal a structure similar to a mid-rise office building more suitable for a suburban office complex than the charming and quaint Marina District of San Francisco. There is simply no other structure like the Proposed Project--in terms of size, prominent location and materials-- anywhere in the Marina. Furthermore, the additional fourth floor will diminish the natural light currently enjoyed by my unit and replace it with glare and reflection from the enormous amount of glass proposed on the project's North-facing side. I urge you to preserve the historic aesthetic of this neighborhood and reject this project. Sincerely, Krista Cosner -- Krista L. Cosner 1500 Francisco St. #11 San Francisco, CA 94115show more 2018-07-26 · 12 comments · 2 / 10
Opposition to proposed redesign of Application 2013.05.31.8402
Dear Commissioners: I am writing to express my opposition to the redesign of the 1503-1507 Francisco St construction project (Application 2013.05.31.8402). I have attached a letter detailing my objections to and concerns about the redesign. I look forward to attending the DR Hearing on Thursday 26 July. Regards, Philip Meza
RE: 1503 - 1507 Francisco Street, SF Case #2013.0847DRPGood evening Planning Commission, Supervisor Stefani et al, I just returned back from a long wonderful vacation to Italy with my two teenagers this past Friday. It was a trip for the memory books for certain. I do appreciate your allowing our DR hearing date to be rescheduled for this Thursday 7/26. I am reaching out to you all for help because I am quite distraught over information shared with me tonight f… Good evening Planning Commission, Supervisor Stefani et al, I just returned back from a long wonderful vacation to Italy with my two teenagers this past Friday. It was a trip for the memory books for certain. I do appreciate your allowing our DR hearing date to be rescheduled for this Thursday 7/26. I am reaching out to you all for help because I am quite distraught over information shared with me tonight from one of my neighbors. See attached. The project sponsor, Jeff Menashe and his wife have distributed a two page long letter in a large mass mailing, dated July 19, 2018 containing horrible untrue personal information about me, attacking my reputation, my character and my ethics - not only as a person but also my long 30 yearlong profession as a very well respected top producing local Realtor in which I make my livelihood from as a single parent. I do not take this behavior or action lightly. Additionally he noted lies and incredulous incorrect information about our 1490 Francisco Street property, it is outrageous. He also stated untruth about another neighbor named, Constance in this same letter. And additionally, made other statements that just never happened. I have never encountered anything so horrible nor have ever been personally attacked like this. I am truly shocked and sickened by all of this. This has taken me by such left field, I don<U+2019>t know what to do other than to reach out to you for your guidance. It is so far off of anything I would ever do, I don<U+2019>t know how to react! And why? How has our DR request turned into a need to personally attack me to gain support? I have never made this process personal towards him. Why would anyone file a DR if this is the outcome?! I am concerned that any support he has generated for his project is based upon deceit and lies. I am even more concerned that this letter has gotten into the hands of so many and will negatively affect my future business. My name as well as my extended families name are well known in the Marina district. This is just absolutely horrid to think someone has spread these lies and attacked our character! What else has he done that I am unaware of ? With social media, internet etc I honestly am so disgusted by this I am numb. I know you don<U+2019>t know me personally, but I could provide you hundreds of character letters about myself, my immediate family, my extended family and our history in the Marina since the early 1920<U+2019>s. Each would indicate that we are a respectable, honest, good people and so completely opposite of what he has described! I must stop my rant and do look forward to hearing from you as what I should do. Thank you in advance for your time. Christina Christina McNair Team McNair Golden Gate Sotheby's International Realty Selling Marin - SF - Sonoma Counties [email removed] [phone removed] BRE# 01183576 www.homeinmarin.comshow more Opposition to 1503 Francisco
I oppose this as it is totally out of sync with the neighborhood's aesthetic. I'm at 1500 Francisco and it's right across the street. Thanks!
Ozzie Rohm · spoken · 2018-07-26 · oppose
Arrogance of power
Jeff Manaschi · spoken · 2018-07-26 · support
Project presentation
Mark Herman · spoken · 2018-07-26 · oppose
Single family home
entertaining yet disturbing comps for 1503 Francisco DR hearing Thursday.....Dear Commissioners and Supervisor Stefani, My apologies for sending a second letter of objection to the proposed project at 1503-07 Francisco Street ahead of this Thursday<U+2019>s hearing. Since we are last on the calendar and may all be half asleep, I wanted to share some links worth reading in advance. Hopefully you<U+2019>ll find them entertaining and disturbing at the same time. There are desi… Dear Commissioners and Supervisor Stefani, My apologies for sending a second letter of objection to the proposed project at 1503-07 Francisco Street ahead of this Thursday<U+2019>s hearing. Since we are last on the calendar and may all be half asleep, I wanted to share some links worth reading in advance. Hopefully you<U+2019>ll find them entertaining and disturbing at the same time. There are design elements in 1503 Francisco screaming for <U+201C>illegal<U+201D>, post-building-inspection unit conversion. This is becoming a trend in neighboring areas like Russian Hill, Cow Hollow, Pac Heights, etc and we<U+2019>d like it stopped and evaluated before it becomes common in the Marina. These all are/were multi-unit buildings marketed, sold, or used as SFH<U+2019>s. 935-937 North Point Street - listed for $8M http://935-937northpoint.com/ 2 unit building with an agent's listing as a SFH. Second unit buried In an ADU off the garage (see door to #937). 2829 Greenwich Street <U+2013> Redfin estimate $7.6M https://www.compass.com/listing/2829-greenwich-street-san-francisco-ca- 94123/1da76b5175fc834acfdda689a6e178fb26ebf068/? origin_type=Listing%20Card&origin=Agent%20Profile%20Page agent's listing for a SFH but having a disapproved dwelling unit merger from 2017 for what's really a 2 unit building. 2860 Greenwich.Street. <U+2013> sold for $8.3M https://sf.curbed.com/2017/9/15/16315280/cow-hollow-home-house-greenwich agent admits <U+201C>Two legal units, designed to flow as one, with a flexible floor plan<U+201D> 2476 Broadway <U+2013> sold for $18.1M https://sf.curbed.com/2016/10/17/13303478/san-francisco-most-expensive-home-2476- broadway Dwelling unit merger from 3 to 2 and sold as a SFH. <U+201C>It<U+2019>s perhaps a little surprising that the city approved the work on the circa 1913 home, given that it resulted in a net loss of housing units. But maybe it had something to do with the fact that it doesn<U+2019>t look like previous owners had bothered to rent out the extra spaces for years anyway.<U+201D> 1750 Taylor St #804 <U+2013> sold for $7.1M http://www.socketsite.com/archives/2017/05/how-planning-gets-played-to-mint-a-few- million-dollars.html <U+201C>How to play planning<U+201D> <U+2013> successful 2to1 DUM that was flipped. 2448-2450 Larkin St <U+2013> sold for $4.7M https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9rzP3PQXNY agent listing says <U+201C>May be modified to live like 6 bed SFH + studio apt<U+201D> <U+2013> familiar design elements? Mark Herrmann 3250 Octavia St.show more Philip Meza · spoken · 2018-07-26 · oppose
Opposition
Marjorie Qualey · spoken · 2018-07-26 · oppose
Opposition
Pam Davis · spoken · 2018-07-26 · oppose
Opposition
Patrick Murphy · spoken · 2018-07-26 · support
Support
1503 Francisco / Application 2013.05.31.8402Commissioners, I<U+2019>m writing to express my continued opposition to the project referenced above. It seems the project sponsor has attempted to do the bare minimum to respond to the feedback provided at the last month<U+2019>s DR hearing. While the exterior has been softened and the materials are now more in line with the surrounding area, the owner and architect have opted to ignore comments … Commissioners, I<U+2019>m writing to express my continued opposition to the project referenced above. It seems the project sponsor has attempted to do the bare minimum to respond to the feedback provided at the last month<U+2019>s DR hearing. While the exterior has been softened and the materials are now more in line with the surrounding area, the owner and architect have opted to ignore comments regarding the roof decks as well as concerns about its utilization. In my opinion, the project is effectively eliminating two rental units in a city that is desperate for more housing stock. Further exacerbating the situation, is the fact this project should not be viewed in isolation. The trend to convert multi-unit buildings into single family homes is prevalent and has the potential to dramatically alter the landscape of this portion of San Francisco. In addition, the owner has acquired the neighboring property which when viewed in conjunction with 1503 suggests a disturbing pattern. As you review the project, the following information should be taken into consideration: The project sponsor originally filed for a consolidation of the three units in 1503 Francisco When rebuffed, the design evolved to what is on the table now The original intent to have a single family residence remains feasible given how the plans remove exterior entrances to the various units, reduce parking and greatly expand the Master unit To allow a fairly obvious workaround of something that was expressly denied makes a mockery out of the code and the planning process The owner has purchased the abutting property at 3255 Octavia Street The owner of 3255 was originally opposed to the project at 1503 (part of the public record) The plans for 3255 are currently in front of the planning department and they feature similar features that effectively make it resemble a single family residence 4 out of the current 5 units between the two properties have been vacant of permanent residency for quite some time The owner mentioned at the last hearing he only has rented the units in 1503 to short-term corporate interests 3255 appears to mirror similar projects that are marketed and sold as effectively single family homes; a new owner won<U+2019>t be beholden to any instructions or feedback from the planning process Approval of both sets of plans as is would put 3 large roof decks on a single corner in a neighborhood where they are not prevalent Decks have been denied over the years over concerns about safety and privacy The Commission should endeavor to be consistent with how it views such structures The deck for 3255 expands an existing deck that doesn<U+2019>t appear to be compliant in the first place I<U+2019>m relieved the last design was denied, but it seems to me this project remains out of step with the wishes of many of the neighbors as well as the goals and objectives of the SF Planning Commission. To allow the two projects referenced above to move forward as currently envisioned has the potential to fundamentally change the dynamic of this portion of the Marina District. I appreciate your consideration and trust you<U+2019>ll assess if the plan adheres to the instructions given to the project sponsor<U+2019>s team during the last hearing. Thanks and regards,show more