SF Planning Commission · Public Comment

110 THE EMBARCADERO

2006.1294

32comments
32in person
0emails
5hearings
20082009in person2008-10-16 — 1 comments, position not recorded (click to read)2008-11-06 — 9 comments, position not recorded (click to read)2009-01-15 — 22 comments, 14% in favour (click to read)email
dashed lines mark hearings · supportopposenot recorded · dot size = comments that day · click a dot to jump to the comment

Hearings

16 Oct 2008 — continuance06 Nov 2008 — approve13 Nov 2008 — approve04 Dec 2008 — continuance15 Jan 2009 — approve with conditions
approved  continued  denied / withdrawn  · 5 hearings · hover a marker for the date and outcome

Comments by hearing (32)

expand all · collapse all · comments with recorded text are listed first

2008-10-16 · 1 comments · no positions recorded
Sue Hestor · spoken · 2008-10-16 · —
no text recorded
2008-11-06 · 9 comments · no positions recorded
Jack Gold · spoken · 2008-11-06 · —
no text recorded
Ernestine Weiss · spoken · 2008-11-06 · —
no text recorded
Catherine Haydn · spoken · 2008-11-06 · —
no text recorded
Georgia Britton · spoken · 2008-11-06 · —
no text recorded
Tom Radulovich · spoken · 2008-11-06 · —
no text recorded
Vedica Puri · spoken · 2008-11-06 · —
no text recorded
Dave Osgood · spoken · 2008-11-06 · —
no text recorded
Telegraph Hill Dwellers · spoken · 2008-11-06 · —
no text recorded
Charles Syers · spoken · 2008-11-06 · —
no text recorded
2009-01-15 · 22 comments · 3 / 19
Dave Osgood · spoken · 2009-01-15 · oppose
We oppose this high rise. It is out of place in this special and important area in this city. It is out of scale with the Audiffred building.
Brad Paul · spoken · 2009-01-15 · oppose
An 84 foot tall building with mechanicals is tall enough. I urge you to disapprove this reclassification. This would be a terrible precedent and why? What decisions have they made to make this building so expensive?
Gerry Crowley · spoken · 2009-01-15 · oppose
We ask that you reconsider your decision and require that a full EIR be done for this project.
P. K. Cannon · spoken · 2009-01-15 · oppose
This is a project of spot zoning and spot zoning is generally not a good idea.
Jennifer Clary · spoken · 2009-01-15 · oppose
SF Tomorrow Offered to take the commission on a tour of the waterfront. Do not pit the environment against the neighborhood. That is what you would be doing with this project. If you give people a density bonus for LEED buildings, you're going to have a fight between greening the city and over building the city.
Jan Wood · spoken · 2009-01-15 · oppose
I oppose this exception to the General Plan and the Waterfront Plan. It's a bad idea to grant this spot zoning.
Zach Stewart · spoken · 2009-01-15 · oppose
We are unique and we should not let developers go against our General Plan
Joe Butler · spoken · 2009-01-15 · oppose
I urge you not to reclassify 110 The Embarcadero for new bulk and height.
Catherine Haydn · spoken · 2009-01-15 · oppose
resident of Rincon Towers The current vacant building is an eyesore and something needs to be done and it's nice that a developer is doing something with the space and its wonderful that the parking has been removed. Why does the building have to be so large and why are we going against the city guidelines and policy?
Paul Wermer · spoken · 2009-01-15 · oppose
I'm here to speak against the spot rezoning. The Waterfront Plan might be an old document, but it can be reviewed with broad public input and updated if need be. That has not been done.
Kathleen Dooley · spoken · 2009-01-15 · oppose
It is a dangerous precedent to allow any development along the Embarcadero to have an exemption to the height limit. Developers will be happy to develop their projects as green to get that bonus. We'll end up with Miami Beach down there.
Nancy Shanahan · spoken · 2009-01-15 · oppose
Follow the Department's original recommendation and disapprove the rezoning of this single site to accommodate this project.
Vedica Puri · spoken · 2009-01-15 · oppose
We are so worried about you approving this because of the spot zoning.
Ernestine Weiss · spoken · 2009-01-15 · support
I live in the area and I'm here to support the project. The building is a jewel box and will enhance the Embarcadero.
Sue Hestor · spoken · 2009-01-15 · oppose
The rational for the height is the building. That is a rational for spot zoning. It should be what is the context for the heights in the Downtown Plan?
Katie Hopkins · spoken · 2009-01-15 · oppose
I'm here to support the staff's original recommendation from November 30, 2008 to disapprove the rezoning of this site because the height increase is in conflict with the current zoning; the proposed design is inappropriate with surrounding buildings; and the new building will cast new shadows on open space.
Diana Taylor · spoken · 2009-01-15 · oppose
Our neighborhood association has strong opposition to any increase in height along the waterfront and we do support a full EIR.
Bill Sauro · spoken · 2009-01-15 · oppose
Go green and get spot rezoning. That is a terrible precedent you will establish with this project.
Nan Roth · spoken · 2009-01-15 · oppose
Please reconsider your decision to grant a 46 percent height bonus as a reward for a LEED certified building.
Paul Paradis · spoken · 2009-01-15 · support
We don't have a formal presentation, but want to thank you for working with us over the past weeks. We have eliminated all of the parking as requested and retained a LEED-Platinum rating.
Andy Katz · spoken · 2009-01-15 · oppose
I am in strong opposition of the rezoning of 110 The Embarcadero from 84 feet to 130 feet. Spot zoning sets a dangerous precedent and undermines the very purpose of the city's Waterfront and General Plans. Please require a full EIR
Michael Burke · spoken · 2009-01-15 · support
representing the Project Sponsor As far as shadow and wind impacts being significant, based on shadow and wind studies in the Mitigated Neg. Dec, they are found not to be significant. As far as inadequate public review, there was public notice of the availability of the Preliminary Mitigated Negative Declaration and of the underlying studies and anyone who had an interest could review them. This is not spot zonin… show more