SF Planning Commission · Public Comment

900 INNES AV

2004.0916 · 900 INNES AVENUE

51comments
51in person
0emails
6hearings
20052006in person2005-04-21 — 2 comments, 100% in favour (click to read)2005-05-19 — 49 comments, 51% in favour (click to read)email
dashed lines mark hearings · supportopposenot recorded · dot size = comments that day · click a dot to jump to the comment

Hearings

03 Mar 2005 — continuanceMar 200521 Apr 2005 — continuance19 May 2005 — continuance21 Jul 2005 — continuance01 Sep 2005 — continuance22 Sep 2005 — continuanceSep 2005
approved  continued  denied / withdrawn  · 6 hearings · hover a marker for the date and outcome

Comments by hearing (51)

expand all · collapse all · comments with recorded text are listed first

2005-04-21 · 2 comments · 1 / 0
Alice Barkley · spoken · 2005-04-21 · —
[Re: Continuance]
Jill Fox · spoken · 2005-04-21 · support
[Re: Continuance] India Basin Neighborhood Association
2005-05-19 · 49 comments · 25 / 24
Courtney Clarkson · spoken · 2005-05-19 · support
- She expressed her dismay at an earlier Commission hearing regarding the many demolitions going on in San Francisco. - She urged the Commission to landmark this property because it is what the community wants and from which the community will benefit.
Gary Gee · spoken · 2005-05-19 · oppose
- The building was completely gutted sometime after 1926. - There are various renovations to the structure. - There is no proof that the building was around as it was stated previously.
Bruce Baumann · spoken · 2005-05-19 · oppose
- He is opposed to the landmark designation. - The question is whether this structure is worthy of a landmark designation? - The project has been renovated many times. - Did anyone from the Landmarks Board or the Planning Department come and inspect the property?
Pamela Ward · spoken · 2005-05-19 · support
- This area is being a target of environmental prejudice. - What the community wants to do is viable to the community. - She feels that this is money vs. the locals.
Alex Lansberg · spoken · 2005-05-19 · support
Norcal Carpenters - She supports the designation of landmark for this building. - There have been no presentations on the proposed new structure.
Lynn Geyer · spoken · 2005-05-19 · oppose
- She read a letter from a neighbor who is opposed to making this project a landmark. - She is appalled by the "witch hunt" going on here.
Grace Shanahan · spoken · 2005-05-19 · oppose
- She continued reading the letter read from the previous speaker.
Michael Spear · spoken · 2005-05-19 · oppose
- If this property is landmarked it would cost a lot of money and the structure would continue to deteriorate.
Patrick Doherty · spoken · 2005-05-19 · oppose
- He owns a business on Innes Avenue. - He believes that the property is not historically significant. - The supporters submitted 600 signatures but he was never approached to sign. - He feels that this is just a personal vendetta against the project sponsor.
Melissa Sherman · spoken · 2005-05-19 · support
- Designating this a landmark will create revenue to the community and would allow residents to enjoy various amenities.
Bill Glover · spoken · 2005-05-19 · support
- The staff planner who is supposed to be impartial is really not.
Demetrius James · spoken · 2005-05-19 · oppose
- He protests the planning process by the India Basin residents. - Initially the group made up a story that the proposed site was a site of a historical school. - The truth of the matter is that the IBNA's involvement is just because they are opposed to any type of housing.
Casey Caruso · spoken · 2005-05-19 · oppose
- This process has gotten out of hand and has cost residents a lot of time. - Many people are supportive of housing and new businesses.
Maryanne Diaz · spoken · 2005-05-19 · oppose
- The structure is just a run down shack and is rotten from the core. - The Commission should see this with their own eyes. - Preserving it would do a disservice to the community. It is a haven for crime.
Angus McCarthy · spoken · 2005-05-19 · oppose
Residential Building Association - He attended the Landmark Board hearing. - It is important to do this City well be demolishing it. - He hopes the Commission will not allow this designation.
Richie Hart · spoken · 2005-05-19 · oppose
- There is only one house that has been in the area for a long time and it is not 900 Innes Avenue. - The City needs jobs and the proposed project would provide that.
Bart Murphy · spoken · 2005-05-19 · oppose
- He is opposed to making this structure a landmark. - The evidence before the Commission does not take this to the level of a landmark.
Simon Casey · spoken · 2005-05-19 · oppose
- He is opposed to making this structure a landmark. - Many of the statements made today are not accurate.
Dennis Bruney · spoken · 2005-05-19 · oppose
- There is no documentation to support what the conditions are in the building. - He opposes the landmark status.
Mark Brennan · spoken · 2005-05-19 · oppose
- No one seems to know what this structure was. - This is only a shack. - Why did the community wait to ask for landmark status when something better is being proposed?
Joe O'Donaghue · spoken · 2005-05-19 · oppose
- This process is just a waist of money. - The site is just a disgrace. - Jobs are more important than landmark status at this location.
Greg Freeman · spoken · 2005-05-19 · support
Contractor/Union Member - He is a resident of Innes Avenue. - The community's vision is to have a maritime museum.
Justice Harris · spoken · 2005-05-19 · support
- She is working hard to save the maritime history of India Basin. - The building is irreplaceable and should be preserved at its current location and not anywhere else.
Cheri Tsai · spoken · 2005-05-19 · support
- This structure needs to be saved if that is what the community wants. - The neighbors are working hard to improve this area. - She requested that this property be preserved in order to have a connection with historical San Francisco.
Brian Scott · spoken · 2005-05-19 · support
- He has lived in the area since 1996. - There are so many people involved in this that it makes it exciting. - He will be working with community organization to help youth build a scout schooner.
Erin Farrell · spoken · 2005-05-19 · support
IBNA (India Basin Neighborhood Association) - She has lived in India Basin for about five years. - The Neighborhood Association has a mission to preserve the history of the area. - This cottage has a very important part in this history. - Community volunteers have been working to save this property for many years. - They have received about 600 signatures supporting saving this property. - She has research the h… show more
Melita Rines · spoken · 2005-05-19 · support
IBNA - She displayed a map of the China Basin area pointing to the various zoning areas--Navy shipyard, PG&E plant and 900 Innes Avenue. - She hopes the Commission will support the Landmark designation.
Wendy Brummer · spoken · 2005-05-19 · support
IBNA - She lives on Innes Avenue. - The subject property has been a humble structure for many years. - The property was built in 1875 and has original ornamentation. - The property also has historical architectural significant features. - There is dry rot and the foundation is practically non-existent, but the current owner had a family living there up to a month ago. So it was habitable. - The issue is not how… show more
Jill Fox · spoken · 2005-05-19 · support
IBNA - She has lived in India Basin for 12 years. - May is National Preservation Month and the Commission can honor this designation by voting yes to this Landmark. - The Landmarks Board voted to designate this property a Landmark.
Hilary Lazar · spoken · 2005-05-19 · oppose
- She was hired to verify the facts in this designation report. - The report is a flawed document full of misinformation, misrepresentation and irrelevant facts. - The document fails to follow typical research protocol. - The report seems driven by an assumption and inference rather than hard evidence and verifiable facts.
John Britain · spoken · 2005-05-19 · oppose
Gary Gee Architects - He displayed a geological map of the area explaining how the area has significantly changed.
Pat Buskovitch · spoken · 2005-05-19 · oppose
- He did a structural investigation of the building. - The building was deconstructed in the 1920s and reconstructed. - What is there now is not what was there in 1899, but it is seismically dangerous.
Tom Reeves · spoken · 2005-05-19 · oppose
- He is an engineer and studied the building - The foundation was constructed in the 1920s using concrete. It is not concrete over brick. - The beams and exterior walls are continuous. - The rear end of the building is an infill from the 1970s where they leveled in the concrete. - Basically, the building went through a number of remodels.
Alice Barkley · spoken · 2005-05-19 · oppose
- If there is any doubt regarding the stability of the property, the presenters are available for questions.
Julie Lane · spoken · 2005-05-19 · support
IBNA - Bulldozing this site is not the answer for this community. It is not what the community needs nor is it their vision.
Hellen Collin · spoken · 2005-05-19 · support
- The subject property has evidence that it has been around for hundreds of years.
Greg Asay · spoken · 2005-05-19 · support
Office of Supervisor Maxwell's Office - This is the last stand regarding San Francisco's maritime working community. - It is important to think about the basis of the Commission's decision. - To rise to the level of preservation, not all the criteria need to be met.
Francisco Da Costa · spoken · 2005-05-19 · oppose
Environmental Justice Advocacy - He recently went to the site and it does not meet any of the criteria to designate this a landmark.
Jeff Condit · spoken · 2005-05-19 · oppose
- The site in question is a perfect place to renew and renovate.
Marcie Prohofsky · spoken · 2005-05-19 · support
Resident/Local Business Owner - Designating this site as a Landmark will encourage tourism and this would be good for the City.
Kelley Lawson · spoken · 2005-05-19 · support
IBNA - Although the property is humble, it is solid. - If the property were in such a bad condition, there would not have been a family living there with no kitchen. - The damage could be fixed. - Preservation is about historical significance.
Pauline Peele · spoken · 2005-05-19 · support
- Making this site a Landmark fits under the San Francisco Planning Code. - It will enhance property values and improve the neighborhood in areas as well as increase financial benefits to the City.
Tori Freeman · spoken · 2005-05-19 · support
- She grew up in the area. - There is a list of supporters that she presented to the Commission, which includes various organizations and businesses.
Karen Everett · spoken · 2005-05-19 · support
- She supports the history of the area because it is a history of working class people. - There are people that will benefit if this property is designated a landmark.
Adrian Card · spoken · 2005-05-19 · support
Bayview Historical Society - He lives and works in the neighborhood. - The community includes hard working, tax paying people. - Saving this structure will benefit the community.
Ingrid Reissland · spoken · 2005-05-19 · support
IBNA/Our lady of Lourdes - As much interest as the developer has, the community wants to make it better by preserving this structure. - She would like to have her daughter go to a maritime park or a museum.
Staci Selinger · spoken · 2005-05-19 · support
- She lives in the area. - Making this site a landmark will make the area a recreation destination for San Franciscans and beyond. - It is important for people who travel to have a museum or historical place to visit.
Pastor Bell · spoken · 2005-05-19 · oppose
The Church of San Francisco - The site is just blight on the community. - The project proposed for the site, would create jobs and homes.
Eva Hum · spoken · 2005-05-19 · support
- She wants palm trees around her neighborhood or swimming pools, etc., but it is important to her that her children have a place that is of historical significance.