2005-02-03 · 43 comments · 22 / 21
Meredith Walters · spoken · 2005-02-03 · support
Central City SRO Collaborative - All she hears about is how much people living in SROs want to move into their own apartments.
- It means a lot to have a bathroom and a kitchen.
Otto Duffy · spoken · 2005-02-03 · support
- He lives in a residential hotel.
- The people who will be able to have their own apartments are people that have navigated trough difficult situations.
Prince Bush · spoken · 2005-02-03 · support
Tenderloin Housing Clinic - He does not go through garbage cans.
- He does not own a car either.
- He does not know where all these stereotypes are coming from.
- He knows that there are not enough affordable housing units so it is important to approve this project.
Patrick Page · spoken · 2005-02-03 · oppose
- He lives on Brannan Street.
- He is not anti the project.
- There are people that did not know about this project.
- The size and scope of the building is too large.
- He is not clear why a penthouse would be built on an SRO building.
Bruce Allison · spoken · 2005-02-03 · support
- He is a sixth generation San Franciscan.
- There are a lot of amenities in this area; there is public transportation, medical facilities, etc.
- He hopes that he will be a resident of these apartments.
Jim Meko · spoken · 2005-02-03 · support
SOMA Leadership Council - He has spent considerable time at this location.
- He has spoken to the adjacent neighbors and after much dialogue had full support from them.
- The problem with parking is caused by the Hall of Justice.
- A lot of the garbage issues are just excuses to not have low-income people living in the area.
Joe O'Donoghue · spoken · 2005-02-03 · support
- He lives on McAllister and knows of garbage noise from the garbage trucks and people getting cans and bottles out in order to sell them.
- The people that move into this transitional housing will probably not own cars until they move out to better and bigger things and be able to afford their cars.
- There are lot-line windows that are illegal on the adjacent building.
Bob Anderson · spoken · 2005-02-03 · oppose
- He is a former homeless person and SRO tenant.
- He is very disappointed with the entire proceedings.
- Parking is a huge issue in the area.
- Density and height of the building are issues also.
Mark Anthony · spoken · 2005-02-03 · support
- He is thankful for Mayor Newsom and his policy of care and not cash.
- He sees this project as a next step to his recovery.
- He feels very lucky that the hotel he lives in has a new manager who was able to clean up the place.
- These studio apartments would be the next phase for a lot of people.
Scott Crader · spoken · 2005-02-03 · oppose
- He has seen the lack of supervision in this type of project.
- The project is too large for the footprint.
- He was not notified about this project.
- This project is in a bad location. It is not productive.
(+/-) Rob Moyera
- He is not opposed to the project at all.
- He is just opposed to blocking natural light.
- He is just asking for a modification of the project.
Aurora Grajeda · spoken · 2005-02-03 · support
- She is a resident of the Mission Hotel.
- There are few people at SROs that own cars.
- She has never known what it means to have your own kitchen and bathroom.
- If there is a chance to build a little bit of housing it should be done.
Anusha Chari · spoken · 2005-02-03 · oppose
- She has been stuck by the fact that people who are in support of the project have done a good job to portray the appellant as a "bad guy."
- Why not have a good design if this project is going to be a blueprint for future similar projects.
- All the testimonies are diverting from getting a properly designed building.
Sue Hestor · spoken · 2005-02-03 · oppose
- There are people in the room who do not want low-income people in the neighborhood.
- There has to be a decent site for this project, otherwise the project needs to be "tweaked."
- The site was a parking lot and people in the neighborhood were able to park there.
- Artists deserve light into their homes.
- It is important to make this project fit into the site.
Charles Breidinger · spoken · 2005-02-03 · support
- Development has become very successful.
- The area is growing.
- This is a good location for this project.
Joe O'Donoghue · spoken · 2005-02-03 · support
- There should be a variance issued.
- There will be 55 units of housing without any money from subsidies.
- This project should be a model for housing because it is very unique housing.
- The project will be built with quality construction materials.
Alice Barkley · spoken · 2005-02-03 · support
- She submitted a letter to the Commission regarding the Conditional Use and the Variance.
- The project will be rental housing.
- The garbage will only come out when it is ready to be picked up, there will be a manager because it is required by law.
- The building code has required that if a building has property line windows, there shall be a light and air easement.
- The project will have a union contractor.
Timothy Rose · spoken · 2005-02-03 · oppose
- The business owners in the area are not against the project; they are just against the size of the building.
- Many people have moved away from San Francisco in order to find affordable studios.
Randy Shaw · spoken · 2005-02-03 · support
- If there were modifications to the building, the project would not be able to go forward.
- There is no flexibility right now.
- He hopes that the Commission understands this crucial issue.
Barton Deversion · spoken · 2005-02-03 · oppose
- He does not know how there will be so many units in the building.
- This is the first time that he has heard that the building is being given to the Tenderloin Housing Authority.
- He is concerned with the quality of construction.
Gerrie Scott · spoken · 2005-02-03 · oppose
- The good of the building is good for the neighbors.
- People have rights so they should not have to be exposed to garbage and flies.
- This buildings should be well designed that will send Mayor Newsom's program of Care not Cash forward.
- People who use a wheelchair should be able to have access to their building, but it would be difficult to have the garbage cans there.
- New construction downtown advoca… - The good of the building is good for the neighbors.
- People have rights so they should not have to be exposed to garbage and flies.
- This buildings should be well designed that will send Mayor Newsom's program of Care not Cash forward.
- People who use a wheelchair should be able to have access to their building, but it would be difficult to have the garbage cans there.
- New construction downtown advocates should be allowed a bicycle unit, a manager's room, etc.show more Joseph Brown · spoken · 2005-02-03 · support
- He lives in a studio in a hotel.
- He is working right now and trying to stay in the working field.
- Although he has low income he would be able to afford the proposed apartments.
David Lupo · spoken · 2005-02-03 · oppose
- He wants housing that is going to last.
- The contractor should be unionized that will pay their workers correctly with quality materials.
Joe Shipman · spoken · 2005-02-03 · support
- He has gotten used to living in SROs.
- He would rather pay a parking ticket than see a homeless person.
- He does not see a parking issue in the area.
- He feels sad for the people that might not get lighting.
- People need housing and he would not mind getting into his own apartment.
Stafford Parker · spoken · 2005-02-03 · support
- He was born and raised in San Francisco.
- He is a single father and would love to live in his own apartment and use his own private bathroom.
- He has been to the project site and there are a lot of amenities in the area.
- He hopes that the Commission will approve this project.
Sue Hestor · spoken · 2005-02-03 · oppose
- There is no parking control in the area so this is an environmental issue.
- The environmental documents need to deal with reality and not standards.
- The City has been lax on putting signs up in the area.
- The analysis of parking problems in this document is not accurate. Garbage is an environmental issue.
- The 20-day notice for the Conditional Use has been ignored.
David Lupo · spoken · 2005-02-03 · oppose
Capenter's Union - Local 22 - Is the project sponsor prepared to report on who will be doing the construction on this project?
Bill Graziano · spoken · 2005-02-03 · oppose
- He and his father have a business in the area.
- He knows the real problems of traffic in the area but this document seems to ignore them.
- He knows several businesses that have left the area because of the parking situation.
- Instead of a roof deck there should be real open space. The unit in the back could be eliminated.
- Maybe the amount of required housing could be reduced.
Nathan Letts · spoken · 2005-02-03 · oppose
CCSS - He has been a resident of the area for four years.
- There are a lot of parking problems on that street.
- Recently a restaurant was approved and it has caused more traffic in the area.
- There is also a trash problem in the neighborhood.
- Having an inside pickup of the garbage cans would be a good idea.
Scott Krager · spoken · 2005-02-03 · oppose
- He has been in the neighborhood for many years.
- When the Hall of Justice was built, they did not provide any parking in the area.
- He has gone to a lot of meetings with the Parking and Traffic Department to express his concerns about the area.
Bruce Wineberg · spoken · 2005-02-03 · oppose
- He has been in the neighborhood.
- He knows that the problems of traffic and garbage are large.
- All the bail bonds, the Hall of Justice, etc. takes up all the parking and even the sidewalks.
- This situation will make the problem much worse.
Anusha Chari · spoken · 2005-02-03 · oppose
CCSS - She walks home in the early evening and safety is her concern.
- There is very little lighting in the area.
- She is concerned that the project will not have a supervisor living on the premises.
Bob Anderson · spoken · 2005-02-03 · oppose
- There is a lot of information that is missing from the EIR.
- Garbage is an absolute problem in the area.
- Indoor garbage receptacles would be a good idea.
- The size of the building is too large.
Richard Morro · spoken · 2005-02-03 · oppose
- The project will affect negatively the neighbors because of shadows.
Gerrie Scott · spoken · 2005-02-03 · oppose
CCSS - Citizens for Cleaner Safer SOMA - They are working with various agencies to clean up the area.
- The Negative Declaration is incorrect on various accounts.
- She has been given several plans so she is a bit confused.
- She has been given documents that have been "whited out" and then written over.
- She is concerned with the garbage cans that will be left on the street.
- She does not know why t… CCSS - Citizens for Cleaner Safer SOMA - They are working with various agencies to clean up the area.
- The Negative Declaration is incorrect on various accounts.
- She has been given several plans so she is a bit confused.
- She has been given documents that have been "whited out" and then written over.
- She is concerned with the garbage cans that will be left on the street.
- She does not know why the project sponsor would not have the garbage company pick up the various garbage cans.show more Timothy Rose · spoken · 2005-02-03 · oppose
- He is representing the tenants of a building in the area.
- There are no windows on the east and west side of the building.
- Covering the windows will get rid of half of the light into the units.
Barton Devirsion · spoken · 2005-02-03 · oppose
- He has owned a business in the area for the last six years.
- There are actually about 30 parking spaces being lost.
- It is difficult to run a business in the area.
- The businesses were there first and there should be some consideration.
Bill Murphy · spoken · 2005-02-03 · support
- He is a former SRO tenant. He is currently at a shelter.
- He needs a place that is not dingy, dark, with an elevator that does not work, etc.
- Most SRO tenants do not want to stay there all their lives.
- This project will provide these people with a place to live in units that have their own bathrooms.
Anthony Faber · spoken · 2005-02-03 · support
- He is in favor of the project.
- This is a great project.
- It is difficult to live in an SRO because a bathroom has to be shared.
Alice Barkley · spoken · 2005-02-03 · support
Representing the Tenderloin Housing Clinic - There will be an onsite manager that will be paid by the Tenderloin Housing Clinic.
- People have had adequate notice of this project.
- The units will be 100% affordable.
- The garbage will be in the garbage room.
- She is available for further questions.
James Collins · spoken · 2005-02-03 · support
- He was a former tenant of a residence hotel.
- For he and his neighbors to have their own bathroom and kitchenette was a great thing.
- People need to have their own apartments.
Valery Simpson · spoken · 2005-02-03 · support
General Manager of the Tenderloin Housing Clinic - There are people that live at the hotel and she hears them speak about moving into a studio apartment.
- There is a class called working class homeless because people work but cannot afford a decent place to live.
- There are many people who are ready to live normal lives.
Randy Shaw · spoken · 2005-02-03 · support
Director of Tenderloin Housing - They work very well with the people on Gilbert Street regarding the garbage.
- Their only concern was that they did not want more garbage trucks come through this small street creating more noise and traffic.
- The building next door is not a residential building.
- There is not that many people that own cars.
- These are studio apartments and not SROs.
- The entire project will … Director of Tenderloin Housing - They work very well with the people on Gilbert Street regarding the garbage.
- Their only concern was that they did not want more garbage trucks come through this small street creating more noise and traffic.
- The building next door is not a residential building.
- There is not that many people that own cars.
- These are studio apartments and not SROs.
- The entire project will have people that quality to live there if they have lived in an SRO for more than one year.
- It is unfortunate that [some of you believe that] people that live in SRO units are people that will be going through garbage cans.
- This is an opportunity to expand their housing program to the homeless.show more Wendy Tompson · spoken · 2005-02-03 · support
Support Services Manager for the Tenderloin Housing Clinic - There are many people who cannot afford regular apartments.
- This project will make this possible.
- She was homeless before. She was eventually employed by Tenderloin Housing and has been able to move up.
- She was still not able to afford a market rate apartment.
- There will be people that will be reuniting with their children.
2005-05-19 · 17 comments · 4 / 13
Joe O'Donaghue · spoken · 2005-05-19 · oppose
- This block has remained unaltered for many years.
- If this addition is allowed, it will invade the privacy of all neighbors.
- Price is not just the only thing; it is the quality of life that is important as well.
Beverly Spector · spoken · 2005-05-19 · support
- She purchased the home many years ago and now they have two children.
- They spoke to their neighbors about the proposed project.
- They do not want to harm anyone but the neighbors did not want to speak to her.
- She agrees with the modifications to the project.
Ron Miguel · spoken · 2005-05-19 · support
- He reviewed the changes made by the architect and he supports this project.
- Nothing is static and should not remain static. There are always changes being done to homes.
Mark English · spoken · 2005-05-19 · support
Project Architect - He has been working with the project sponsor for about a year now on this project.
- He described the project and how this design is allowed from the Residential Design Guidelines.
Alex Landsford · spoken · 2005-05-19 · oppose
- It is important to maintain historical continuity in neighborhoods.
Steve Williams · spoken · 2005-05-19 · oppose
- He found out about this project and could not resist coming and expressing his opposition to it.
- This project will impact the light and air for the neighbors.
- He agrees with the planner's recommendation to modify this project.
Kenneth Lipson · spoken · 2005-05-19 · support
- He feels that he should enjoy his property rights and their project should be allowed.
- This addition is not intrusive and it is an impressive design scheme.
- The revised design respects the neighborhood character.
- Many petitioners who signed opposing the project did not know what they were signing.
Diane O'Malley · spoken · 2005-05-19 · oppose
- She lives in the area.
- She is here to support and guard the light and air and quality of life of the DR requestor.
- It is important to protect open spaces. She came from Manhattan so she values open spaces.
Ann Marie Smith · spoken · 2005-05-19 · oppose
- The proposed extension would affect the livability of her parents.
- The proposal would also be incompatible with the character of the neighborhood.
Angus McCarthy · spoken · 2005-05-19 · oppose
- He does not know the Discretionary Review requestor but he is working on a project similar to theirs. Even though the guidelines allow you to build in a certain way, there should be respect for the existing conditions.
- He hopes that the Commission will revise this plan or deny it all together.
Grace Shanahan · spoken · 2005-05-19 · oppose
- This proposal would not allow for the current mid block open space.
- The mid block open space also allows for light to come in to kitchens in the homes on the block.
- Prices are not the only singular reason that stops people from living in San Francisco; it is also the quality of life.
- The pattern of the mid block open space will be destroyed if this proposal is approved.
Teresa Going · spoken · 2005-05-19 · oppose
- She objects to the rear expansion. It will strongly affect the quality of her parent's home.
- Her mom really enjoys putting the clothes out on the line and she enjoys the sunshine.
- This extension would hurt the character and style of the neighborhood.
Julia Birmingham · spoken · 2005-05-19 · oppose
- There are a few houses on the block that already have diminished light and air and one of them is her parents house.
- The proposal would cause a tunnel affect on her parent's home.
- She requested that the Commission not allow this proposal to go forward.
Josephine Smith · spoken · 2005-05-19 · oppose
- She objects to this rear addition.
- She and her husband have lived in their home for 33 years.
- All of the houses in the area have three bedrooms only.
- She and her husband raised children in their house with the size that it is now.
- If this project should be approved, she asks for a four-foot setback. This will allow sunshine and air to their home.
Bernard Smith · spoken · 2005-05-19 · oppose
Discretionary Review Requestor - If this large, obtrusive structure is allowed, he will loose light and air coming to his house.
- He understands the need for improving the quality of life of your children, but the previous owner raised four children there.
- The proposal should be neighbor friendly and it is not.
Lou Blazej · spoken · 2005-05-19 · oppose
Representing Discretionary Review Requestor - There is a pattern to the houses on the street where this project is proposed.
- This pattern should be maintained and protected.
- It is an inappropriate proposal. He hopes the Commission will deny this application.
Oliver McCabe · spoken · 2005-05-19 · oppose
- He is a retired building inspector.
- This proposal will affect the quality of life for the Discretionary Review requestor.
- The DR requestor has a very small yard and the proposed addition will completely block their light and air.