SF Planning Commission · Public Comment

8 Washington Street

2002.0376 · 8 WASHINGTON STREET

43comments
43in person
0emails
2hearings
20032004in person2004-02-05 — 43 comments, 40% in favour (click to read)email
dashed lines mark hearings · supportopposenot recorded · dot size = comments that day · click a dot to jump to the comment

Hearings

11 Dec 2003 — continuance05 Feb 2004 — approve
approved  continued  denied / withdrawn  · 2 hearings · hover a marker for the date and outcome

Comments by hearing (43)

expand all · collapse all · comments with recorded text are listed first

2004-02-05 · 43 comments · 17 / 26
Sue Hestor · spoken · 2004-02-05 · oppose
Appellant - She has agreed that her request to challenge the jurisdiction will be heard after this case. She did file it to be heard before this matter. - Even a Negative Declaration has to be accurate. - She represents Friends of the Golden Gateway. The major issue is that the project is being built on a site that has been recreation and open space that was built in conjunction with the Golden Gateway for 40 yea… show more
Lawrence Doxsee · spoken · 2004-02-05 · oppose
[Re: Jurisdiction of the Planning Department] - He lives on Union Street. - He swims quite often at the Golden Gateway pools. - This project will eliminate three of the tennis courts and open space. - The project will also eliminate a lap pool and place it on a second floor which will have a shadow cast upon it by adjacent buildings.
John Wilson · spoken · 2004-02-05 · support
[Re: Jurisdiction of the Planning Department] Webcor Builders - When approved the project will be built by a contractor that has done a lot of work in San Francisco and has worked with a lot of City agencies. - The developer proactively came to them and told them that it was not a Redevelopment Project but it was the right thing to do to develop some guidelines similar to the agency's.
Bob Iwersen · spoken · 2004-02-05 · oppose
[Re: Jurisdiction of the Planning Department] Friends of Golden Gateway - His great-grandparents came to San Francisco in 1952. - He lives in the Golden Gateway Commons. - He is an architect and belies that the Golden Gateway Tennis and Swim Club is one of the best athletic centers in the City. - This facility should be enhanced rather than marginalized. - He is concerned with the loss of view. (+/-) Bruce Bonac… show more
Holly Suzara · spoken · 2004-02-05 · oppose
[Re: Jurisdiction of the Planning Department] Friends of Golden Gateway - As a property owner and a resident of the community, she does not feel that a property owner can do what they please to their land. - The project does not improve the quality of life for the residents.
Franz Nagai · spoken · 2004-02-05 · support
[Re: Jurisdiction of the Planning Department] - He has lived at the Golden Gateway Center for the last 25 years. - He has no plans to move away. - He is semi-retired and is looking for some place to buy. - He is in support of the project because he would like to buy a unit and live in it when the project is over. - The health club will be improved and he is looking forward to it. (+/-) Thomas S. Lister - Residen… show more
Keith Wilson · spoken · 2004-02-05 · support
[Re: Jurisdiction of the Planning Department] - His wife is a frequent tennis player. - The speakers against this project are saying that the health club will be gone forever. The only thing being lost are three tennis courts. - The health club will be greatly improved plus 120 residential units will be created. - There are a lot of resources that are being put into low income housing and very little put into mid… show more
Paula Aspin · spoken · 2004-02-05 · oppose
[Re: Jurisdiction of the Planning Department] - She is opposed to everything that the previous speaker said. - She is not going to be able to afford the fees when the athletic club is finished. - There is nothing wrong with the way the club looks presently.
Frank O'Neal · spoken · 2004-02-05 · support
[Re: Jurisdiction of the Planning Department] Pier 50-A - He is a former member of the Port Commission. - He has participated in various developments at the waterfront. - He is very close to the Embarcadero and has an office at the waterfront. - He likes this project. It is moderate and tasteful.
Dina Poursardar · spoken · 2004-02-05 · support
[Re: Jurisdiction of the Planning Department] - Her husband was an architect. - She is in support of this project. It will be a piece of art. - She admires the architect of this project.
Betty Magovern · spoken · 2004-02-05 · oppose
[Re: Jurisdiction of the Planning Department] - She has been a tenant at the Golden Gateway for almost 32 years. - She is no longer a member of the Swim and Tennis Club. - This is not a private club. This is a club that the public can go to. - She does not support this proposal.
Eula Walters · spoken · 2004-02-05 · oppose
[Re: Jurisdiction of the Planning Department] - She has lived in the Golden Gateway for 32 years. - She can swim in the pool in the morning and see the Ferry Buildings. - She is worried about loosing the view of the Ferry Building and the clouds. - This is the best City and best area to live at. - If this is taken away, the Commission will take away one of the best things that the City has.
John Hill · spoken · 2004-02-05 · oppose
[Re: Jurisdiction of the Planning Department] FOGG - Friends of Golden Gate - He lives in the outer Richmond and is a member of the Tennis and Swim club with his family. - Fitness facilities are tremendous family assets. - He combines family outings by going to the club and shopping at the Embarcadero. - The numbers just don't make sense: 120 luxury condos vs. 1,700 members that include seniors and children.
Tim O'Shea · spoken · 2004-02-05 · oppose
[Re: Jurisdiction of the Planning Department] - He is speaking on behalf of families and children. - There are 400 kids in the summer camps. - There is a quality of community at the club. - The club is a very rare asset.
Khay Loke · spoken · 2004-02-05 · support
[Re: Jurisdiction of the Planning Department] Project Manager - Hamilton Partners - He read a letter from the Deputy Director of Car Share who is in support of the project because the project will contain up to two parking spaces for car share.
Nicholas O'Neill · spoken · 2004-02-05 · oppose
[Re: Jurisdiction of the Planning Department] - If the Golden Gateway goes, it will not be coming back. - It is important to hang on to what we have. - He has lived in various countries and in no place has he seen a facility like the Golden Gateway. He and his wife are members and hopes that his future kids will benefit from it. - The club is mobbed by families.
Jeremy Nelson · spoken · 2004-02-05 · oppose
[Re: Jurisdiction of the Planning Department] Transportation for a Livable City - This project has too much parking. - If there is any site that does not have to exceed the code for parking, it is this site. - There is no need for the amount of parking proposed. - The current club operates with 15 parking spaces only. Thirty-three percent of an increase in parking and reducing membership, tennis courts, etc. just does not make sense.
Martin Ward · spoken · 2004-02-05 · oppose
[Re: Jurisdiction of the Planning Department] Director of Operations of Carramerica - Carramerica is opposed to this project because the tower will have a detrimental operational economic impact on the Golden Gate Commons. - It will be difficult for Carramerica to lease space. - The construction of the tower will cause a negative impact to various tenants.
Pamela Duffy · spoken · 2004-02-05 · support
[Re: Jurisdiction of the Planning Department] - The families that will benefit by living in the affordable housing that this project will create are not here to defend themselves. - The recreational facility will be different only by three tennis courts. In comparison, many more people will benefit from this project. - The club has notified its members on how they will provide for them while construction is going on.
Ron Miguel · spoken · 2004-02-05 · support
[Re: Jurisdiction of the Planning Department] Chair of the Housing Action Coalition - He has been to various site visits and has had conversations with various people that live in the Gateway. - This is great urban design. Dean Macris said it best by saying that it frames the section of the waterfront between itself and the MUNI property. - The project is near transit and will have increased service. - The project meets the planning criteria, etc.
Sue Hestor · spoken · 2004-02-05 · oppose
[Re: Jurisdiction of the Planning Department] FOGG - The decision that the Commission is making will have a lot more implications than on this project. - Golden Gateway is at the highest density that is allowed. - There is going to be a lot more resistance from people when one is trying to convince them that a good job can be done on residential density in this City. - There is very little information in the packe… show more
Lorraine Sorensen · spoken · 2004-02-05 · oppose
[Re: Jurisdiction of the Planning Department] - She lives in the North Beach area. - She read a letter from a member of the public who had to leave and is opposed to the project.
Ernestine Weiss · spoken · 2004-02-05 · oppose
[Re: Jurisdiction of the Planning Department] - There are various projects at the waterfront that will affect the traffic in the area and all this is not being discussed right now. - This area will have the worst traffic jams. - This is the most unnecessary building being proposed. - There was a recent death because of the dangerous traffic situation. - Open space is more necessary than luxury housing.
Thomas S. Lister · spoken · 2004-02-05 · oppose
Resident of the Golden Gateway Center - He and his wife have resided at the Golden Gateway since 1980. - They will be directly affected by this project. - A negative declaration gets this far and has to go through an appeal level. Many people were never contacted. - He received only one phone call. Ever since then he has been trying to get in touch with someone, but to no avail. - Putting 120 units in the area … show more
Cris Biaty · spoken · 2004-02-05 · oppose
- He lives in the Golden Gateway apartments. - He is opposed to the project even though he is not a member of the tennis club. - He is concerned about public safety. - His apartment is on the 16 th floor and can they see a lot of what goes on on the street. - The area is not a safe situation for elderly and children regarding traffic. - He does not feel that there has been enough study done on this.
Ernestine Weiss · spoken · 2004-02-05 · oppose
- She feels that there has not been enough traffic study done on the intersections surrounding the project. - She has been able to get traffic lights in the area. - There are a lot of seniors in the area and it could be dangerous for them.
Pamela Duffy · spoken · 2004-02-05 · support
Coblentz, Patch, Duffy and Bass - There is no substantial evidence that this project could cause a significant negative impact on the environment. - The Rec and Park department has done an analysis on the shadow impact. - There has been an extensive traffic study done on the project. - It has been one of the more thorough jobs done on this project. - She urges the Commission to uphold the negative declaration.
Jeffrey Heller · spoken · 2004-02-05 · support
[Re: Jurisdiction of the Planning Department] Representing Project Sponsor - He gave a PowerPoint presentation on the general aspects of the project showing renderings, photographs of the proposed structure, engineering drawings emphasizing the swimming pools and shadow analysis.
James Eggert · spoken · 2004-02-05 · oppose
[Re: Jurisdiction of the Planning Department] FOGG - Friends of Golden Gate - He lives to blocks away from the project. - He read a letter from Edward Healthow who is opposed to the project.
Jim Gerber · spoken · 2004-02-05 · support
[Re: Jurisdiction of the Planning Department] President of the Western Athletic Clubs - He has more than a casual interest in making sure that the future of the tennis club is in his best interest and his members' best interest. - He is satisfied that the finished product will meet the needs of the community that is served by the tennis and swim club. - He was concerned about how the transition will take place… show more
Nan Roth · spoken · 2004-02-05 · oppose
[Re: Jurisdiction of the Planning Department] Telegraph Hill Dwellers - The dwellers have had a long time association with the Golden Gateway. - She read a letter from the Telegraph Hill Dwellers Association who are not in support of the project.
Michael Alexander · spoken · 2004-02-05 · support
[Re: Jurisdiction of the Planning Department] - He travels the area various times a week. - He has been a very active member of various boards and organizations in San Francisco. - He has listened closely to the testimonies on this project. There is no open space situation here. - His major problem with this project is the 170 parking spaces, which require conditional use, and is grossly in excess of what is need… show more
Stan Warren · spoken · 2004-02-05 · support
[Re: Jurisdiction of the Planning Department] San Francisco Building and Construction Trades Council - This project parallels a vision for the community. It will also increase housing. - Housing is very necessary. - This project complies with all the codes and he urges the Commission to approve the project. - It will also create many construction jobs.
Jim Salinas · spoken · 2004-02-05 · support
[Re: Jurisdiction of the Planning Department] Carpenter's Union Local 22 - He was born and raised in San Francisco. - There is a huge housing crisis in the City. - The development team has done due diligence and has been very sensitive to the neighbors in the area.
Victor Honig · spoken · 2004-02-05 · oppose
[Re: Jurisdiction of the Planning Department] Block II Golden Gateway Commons - There is a constant saying that there is a shortage of housing. It is true. - The shortage is in affordable housing and not in luxury housing. - He lives in Golden Gateway Commons No. 2. - The height of the building would be out of scale to the buildings in the Embarcadero.
Marta Fry · spoken · 2004-02-05 · support
[Re: Jurisdiction of the Planning Department] Landscape Architect - They did an analysis of the health of the trees currently in the Golden Gateway. - Many trees have been mistreated and need to be replaced. Other trees will be kept. - The pool podium (exterior pool terrace) will contain hardsape and lawn. - Proper irrigation will be installed to create a safe and beautiful environment.
Nan McGuire · spoken · 2004-02-05 · oppose
[Re: Jurisdiction of the Planning Department] FOGG - She is a member of the Golden Gateway. - District 3 has the highest density of all the districts. - District 3 is tied with District 6 on the least amount of open space per capita. - The developer wants to totally demolish the pools and increase the fitness space. - The current fitness space is under utilized. - She urges the Commission to not approve the project.
Walter Johnson · spoken · 2004-02-05 · support
[Re: Jurisdiction of the Planning Department] Labor Council - He supports this project completely because it will provide necessary residential units. - It is important to provide jobs, not just housing. - It is important to move forward.
Lee Radiner · spoken · 2004-02-05 · oppose
[Re: Jurisdiction of the Planning Department] Golden Gate Tennis and Swim Club - He lives in the Golden Gateway and is a member of the Tennis and Swim Club. - He submitted a petition with about 3,000 signatures of people who are opposed to the project. - The club participates in various organizations and all this will be affected. - This project will create 120 luxury units, which will destroy the neighborhood.
John Hamilton · spoken · 2004-02-05 · support
[Re: Jurisdiction of the Planning Department] - He is representing the Project Sponsor - They have been working on the planning and study of this project for about two years. - All this analysis has created a lot of comments. - He thanked the members of the Planning Commission for all their work on this project.
Cris Biotti · spoken · 2004-02-05 · oppose
[Re: Jurisdiction of the Planning Department] - The intersections at Washington and Drum and Jackson and Drum are very dangerous intersections. - There are future projects at the waterfront that are not being discussed right now and should be. - Computer generated numbers do not tell the complete story. - Residents of the Golden Gateway have not been heard and are being ignored. - The residents of the Golden Gate… show more
Helen Hui · spoken · 2004-02-05 · oppose
[Re: Jurisdiction of the Planning Department] Golden Gateway Commons - They have written various letters in opposition to this project. - The original designers of this project designed it to create a certain amount of open spaces. - This new developer is destroying a facility that is used by many. - She urged the Commission to deny the project.
Joan Chucheck · spoken · 2004-02-05 · oppose
[Re: Jurisdiction of the Planning Department] - She is a lifelong swimmer. The City is just terrible for a swimmers. - For a swimmer who wants to swim outdoors, Golden Gateway is the only one. - What she sees that is being proposed is just another high rise development that will take away from the general public's ability to swim outdoors. - She urges the Commission to realize that people need more than just housing and this includes recreation.